EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jinxuan Wu
dblp:176/1502
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-0757-779XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 49% Segmentation and scene understanding · 32% Information extraction and text analysis · 8% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Spatial and temporal data management · 67% Distributed and cloud data management · 33% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SCoUT: A Framework for Structured Stereotype Analysis in Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SCoUT: A Framework for Structured Stereotype Analysis in Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
representation probing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SCoUT: A Framework for Structured Stereotype Analysis in Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias evaluation
stereotype analysis |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | SCoUT: A Framework for Structured Stereotype Analysis in Language Models · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
medical image segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GauSAM: Contour‑Guided 2D Gaussian Fields for Multi‑Scale Medical Image Segmentation with Segment Anything · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › image segmentation › hierarchical segmentation
multiscale segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GauSAM: Contour‑Guided 2D Gaussian Fields for Multi‑Scale Medical Image Segmentation with Segment Anything · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › prompt-based segmentation
segment anything model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GauSAM: Contour‑Guided 2D Gaussian Fields for Multi‑Scale Medical Image Segmentation with Segment Anything · NeurIPS 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Characterizing and Verifying Scientific Claims: Qualitative Causal Structure is All You Need · EMNLP 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › fact-checking
scientific claim verification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Characterizing and Verifying Scientific Claims: Qualitative Causal Structure is All You Need · EMNLP 2023 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › neural rendering
3d gaussian splatting |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | GauSAM: Contour‑Guided 2D Gaussian Fields for Multi‑Scale Medical Image Segmentation with Segment Anything · NeurIPS 2025 |
Spatial and temporal data management › spatial query processing
spatial join |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A demonstration of GeoSpark: A cluster computing framework for processing big spatial data · ICDE 2016 |
Spatial and temporal data management
spatial query processing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | A demonstration of GeoSpark: A cluster computing framework for processing big spatial data · ICDE 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
thurstonian modeling · 1.0attention probing · 1.0activation steering · 1.0parameter-efficient fine-tuning · 0.9contourlet transform · 0.92d gaussian probability field · 0.9pre-trained language model · 0.7graph neural network · 0.7attention mechanism · 0.7spatial partitioning · 0.2spatial indexing · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | SCoUT: A Framework for Structured Stereotype Analysis in Language ModelsabstractExisting stereotype auditing methods for Large Language Models (LLMs) typically rely on isolated rating schemes or task-specific probes, lacking theoretical grounding and failing to reveal internal organization beyond surface-level output patterns. In this paper, we introduce SCoUT (Stereotype Content-oriented Utility structure via Thurstonian modeling), a closed-loop framework that structurally models, explicitly probes, and functionally steers stereotype dimensions (warmth and competence) in LLMs. SCoUT first reconstructs a global stereotype utility structure aligned with Stereotype Content Model theory via Thurstonian comparative judgments. Across multiple open-source LLMs, this modeling achieves high pairwise-preference prediction accuracy (≥ 0.90 on larger-scale models) and exhibits strong cross-model consistency. Probing internal attention mechanisms localizes this structure to specific heads (Spearman’s ρ up to 0.83 for warmth and 0.90 for competence) and surfaces a salient asymmetry between warmth and competence. Further, targeted inference-time activation modifications on these dimension-sensitive heads consistently steer model outputs along the intended axes. By bridging behavioral measurement with internal representation and controllable steering, SCoUT offers an end-to-end framework that uncovers and interprets the latent structure of stereotypes, advancing stereotype auditing from surface detection to structural analysis. Jinxuan Wu, Bin Li 0015, Xiangyang Xue 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2025 | FAEF: Frequency-Adaptive Economics Forecasting that Works
Zeqian Huang, Jinxuan Wu, Jiaxin Kang |
ICIC (15) | 3 |
| 2025 | GauSAM: Contour‑Guided 2D Gaussian Fields for Multi‑Scale Medical Image Segmentation with Segment AnythingabstractEffective multiscale medical image segmentation requires simultaneously preserving smooth spatial continuity and accurately delineating high-frequency boundaries, yet pixel-wise decoders often fail to maintain this balance consistently across varying resolutions. We introduce GauSAM, which seamlessly integrates contour‑guided 2D Gaussian probability fields into the Segment Anything Model to address these challenges. In our framework, segmentation masks are parameterized as continuous probability fields of learnable 2D Gaussian primitives, enforcing spatially smooth and structurally consistent. Contourlet transforms extract rich multidirectional frequency information, notably edges and fine textures, which dynamically guide the spatial distribution of Gaussian primitives to substantially improve boundary fidelity in complex structures. The incorporation of these high-frequency contour priors also enriches the expressive capacity of the SAM image encoder. Extensive experiments on diverse 2D medical segmentation tasks confirm that GauSAM consistently delivers robust generalization and state-of-the-art performance with only 1.2M trainable parameters. The official implementation of GauSAM is publicly available at https://github.com/Quinten-Wu504/GauSAM. Jinxuan Wu, Jiange Wang, Dongdong Zhang 0002 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Characterizing and Verifying Scientific Claims: Qualitative Causal Structure is All You NeedabstractA scientific claim typically begins with the formulation of a research question or hypothesis, which is a tentative statement or proposition about a phenomenon or relationship between variables.Within the realm of scientific claim verification, considerable research efforts have been dedicated to attention architectures and leveraging the text comprehension capabilities of Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs), yielding promising performances.However, these models overlook the causal structure information inherent in scientific claims, thereby failing to establish a comprehensive chain of causal inference.This paper delves into the exploration to highlight the crucial role of qualitative causal structure in characterizing and verifying scientific claims based on evidence.We organize the qualitative causal structure into a heterogeneous graph and propose a novel attentionbased graph neural network model to facilitate causal reasoning across relevant causallypotent factors.Our experiments demonstrate that by solely utilizing the qualitative causal structure, the proposed model achieves comparable performance to PLM-based models.Furthermore, by incorporating semantic features, our model outperforms state-of-the-art approaches comprehensively. 1 Jinxuan Wu, Wen-Han Chao, Xian Zhou 0003, Zhunchen Luo |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2016 | A demonstration of GeoSpark: A cluster computing framework for processing big spatial dataabstractThis paper demonstrates GEOSPARK a cluster computing framework for developing and processing large-scale spatial data analytics programs. GEOSPARK consists of three main layers: Apache Spark Layer, Spatial RDD Layer and Spatial Query Processing Layer. Apache Spark Layer provides basic Apache Spark functionalities as regular RDD operations. Spatial RDD Layer consists of three novel Spatial Resilient Distributed Datasets (SRDDs) which extend regular Apache Spark RDD to support geometrical and spatial objects with data partitioning and indexing. Spatial Query Processing Layer executes spatial queries (e.g., Spatial Join) on SRDDs. The dynamic status of SRDDs and spatial operations are visualized by GEOSPARK monitoring map interface. We demonstrate GEOSPARK using three spatial analytics applications (spatial aggregation, autocorrelation and co-location) to show how users can easily define their spatial analytics tasks and efficiently process such tasks on large-scale spatial data at interactive performance. Jia Yu 0001, Jinxuan Wu, Mohamed Sarwat |
ICDE | 2 |
| 2015 | GeoSpark: a cluster computing framework for processing large-scale spatial dataabstractThis paper introduces GeoSpark an in-memory cluster computing framework for processing large-scale spatial data. GeoSpark consists of three layers: Apache Spark Layer, Spatial RDD Layer and Spatial Query Processing Layer. Apache Spark Layer provides basic Spark functionalities that include loading / storing data to disk as well as regular RDD operations. Spatial RDD Layer consists of three novel Spatial Resilient Distributed Datasets (SRDDs) which extend regular Apache Spark RDDs to support geometrical and spatial objects. GeoSpark provides a geometrical operations library that accesses Spatial RDDs to perform basic geometrical operations (e.g., Overlap, Intersect). System users can leverage the newly defined SRDDs to effectively develop spatial data processing programs in Spark. The Spatial Query Processing Layer efficiently executes spatial query processing algorithms (e.g., Spatial Range, Join, KNN query) on SRDDs. GeoSpark also allows users to create a spatial index (e.g., R-tree, Quad-tree) that boosts spatial data processing performance in each SRDD partition. Preliminary experiments show that GeoSpark achieves better run time performance than its Hadoop-based counterparts (e.g., SpatialHadoop). Jia Yu 0001, Jinxuan Wu, Mohamed Sarwat |
SIGSPATIAL/GIS | 2 |