Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jun Allard
dblp:176/3338
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2758-4515ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene expression modeling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable inference and identifiability of kinetic parameters for transcriptional bursting from single cell data · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology › parameter estimation
identifiability analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable inference and identifiability of kinetic parameters for transcriptional bursting from single cell data · Bioinform. 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology › parameter estimation
kinetic parameter estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable inference and identifiability of kinetic parameters for transcriptional bursting from single cell data · Bioinform. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic telegraph model · 0.9chemical master equation · 0.9bayesian inference · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Scalable inference and identifiability of kinetic parameters for transcriptional bursting from single cell dataabstractMOTIVATION: Stochastic gene expression and cell-to-cell heterogeneity have attracted increased interest in recent years, enabled by advances in single-cell measurement technologies. These studies are also increasingly complemented by quantitative biophysical modeling, often using the framework of stochastic biochemical kinetic models. However, inferring parameters for such models (i.e., the kinetic rates of biochemical reactions) remains a technical and computational challenge, particularly doing so in a manner that can leverage high-throughput single-cell sequencing data. RESULTS: In this work, we develop a chemical master equation model reference library-based computational pipeline to infer kinetic parameters describing noisy mRNA distributions from single-cell RNA sequencing data, using the commonly applied stochastic telegraph model. The approach fits kinetic parameters via steady-state distributions, as measured across a population of cells in snapshot data. Our pipeline also serves as a tool for comprehensive analysis of parameter identifiability, in both a priori (studying model properties in the absence of data) and a posteriori (in the context of a particular dataset) use-cases. The pipeline can perform both of these tasks, i.e. inference and identifiability analysis, in an efficient and scalable manner, and also serves to disentangle contributions to uncertainty in inferred parameters from experimental noise versus structural properties of the model. We found that for the telegraph model, the majority of the parameter space is not practically identifiable from single-cell RNA sequencing data, and low experimental capture rates worsen the identifiability. Our methodological framework could be extended to other data types in the fitting of small biochemical network models. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All code relevant to this work is available at https://github.com/Read-Lab-UCI/TelegraphLikelihoodInfer, archival DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16915450. Junhao Gu, Nandor Laszik, Christopher E. Miles, Jun Allard, Timothy L. Downing, Elizabeth L. Read |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2019 | Hydrodynamics of transient cell-cell contact: The role of membrane permeability and active protrusion lengthabstractIn many biological settings, two or more cells come into physical contact to form a cell-cell interface. In some cases, the cell-cell contact must be transient, forming on timescales of seconds. One example is offered by the T cell, an immune cell which must attach to the surface of other cells in order to decipher information about disease. The aspect ratio of these interfaces (tens of nanometers thick and tens of micrometers in diameter) puts them into the thin-layer limit, or "lubrication limit", of fluid dynamics. A key question is how the receptors and ligands on opposing cells come into contact. What are the relative roles of thermal undulations of the plasma membrane and deterministic forces from active filopodia? We use a computational fluid dynamics algorithm capable of simulating 10-nanometer-scale fluid-structure interactions with thermal fluctuations up to seconds- and microns-scales. We use this to simulate two opposing membranes, variously including thermal fluctuations, active forces, and membrane permeability. In some regimes dominated by thermal fluctuations, proximity is a rare event, which we capture by computing mean first-passage times using a Weighted Ensemble rare-event computational method. Our results demonstrate a parameter regime in which the time it takes for an active force to drive local contact actually increases if the cells are being held closer together (e.g., by nonspecific adhesion), a phenomenon we attribute to the thin-layer effect. This leads to an optimal initial cell-cell separation for fastest receptor-ligand binding, which could have relevance for the role of cellular protrusions like microvilli. We reproduce a previous experimental observation that fluctuation spatial scales are largely unaffected, but timescales are dramatically slowed, by the thin-layer effect. We also find that membrane permeability would need to be above physiological levels to abrogate the thin-layer effect. Brian Chu, Jay M. Newby, Elizabeth L. Read, John S. Lowengrub, Jun Allard |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 6 |