Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nanna Gorm

dblp:176/4204 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-6440-9193ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
Health and well-being technologies · 56% Wearable and physiological sensing · 44%
Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wearable and physiological sensing
activity tracking
0.522017
Participant Driven Photo Elicitation for Understanding Activity Tracking: Benefits and Limitations · CSCW 2017
Sharing Steps in the Workplace: Changing Privacy Concerns Over Time · CHI 2016
Health and well-being technologies
health promotion
0.522017
Participant Driven Photo Elicitation for Understanding Activity Tracking: Benefits and Limitations · CSCW 2017
Steps, Choices and Moral Accounting: Observations from a Step-Counting Campaign in the Workplace · CSCW 2016
Health and well-being technologies › physical activity
fitness tracking
0.212016
Steps, Choices and Moral Accounting: Observations from a Step-Counting Campaign in the Workplace · CSCW 2016
Wearable and physiological sensing › activity tracking
activity trackers
0.112016
Sharing Steps in the Workplace: Changing Privacy Concerns Over Time · CHI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

observational study · 0.5photo elicitation · 0.3longitudinal study · 0.3social ecology lens · 0.2in-situ study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Participant Driven Photo Elicitation for Understanding Activity Tracking: Benefits and Limitations
abstract
Studying in-situ technology use over time can be difficult and this is especially so when considering technologies such as activity tracking devices explicitly designed to be unobtrusive. Yet understanding activity tracking in practice is crucial, as tracking technologies become important tools for health promotion and health insurance programs. In this paper, we describe a method for a longitudinal participant-driven photo elicitation study of activity tracking. During the five-month long study, our drop-out rates were low and we observed idiosyncratic practices with lapses and particular use patterns among participants along with significant self-reflection on activity tracking as a practice. We describe our method in detail, discussing the necessary adaptations for the study of activity tracking practices. We offer our experiences of benefits and challenges of this process, and suggest points for consideration for future studies in the area.
Nanna Gorm, Irina Shklovski
CSCW1
2016 Sharing Steps in the Workplace: Changing Privacy Concerns Over Time
abstract
Personal health technologies are increasingly introduced in workplace settings. Yet little is known about workplace implementations of activity tracker use and the kind of experiences and concerns employees might have when engaging with these technologies in practice. We report on an observational study of a Danish workplace participating in a step counting campaign. We find that concerns of employees who choose to participate and those who choose not to differ. Moreover, privacy concerns of participants develop and change over time. Our findings challenge the assumption that consumers are becoming more comfortable with perceived risks associated with wearable technologies, instead showing how users can be initially influenced by the strong positive rhetoric surrounding these devices, only to be surprised by the necessity to renegotiate boundaries of disclosure in practice.
Nanna Gorm, Irina Shklovski
CHI1
2016 Steps, Choices and Moral Accounting: Observations from a Step-Counting Campaign in the Workplace
abstract
Sedentary work is a contributing factor to growing obesity levels worldwide. Research shows that step-counters can offer a way to motivate greater physical mobility. We present an in-situ study of a nation-wide workplace step-counting campaign. Our findings show that in the context of the workplace steps are a socially negotiated quantity and that participation in the campaign has an impact on those who volunteer to participate and those who opt-out. We highlight that specific health promotion initiatives do not operate in a vacuum, but are experienced as one out of many efforts offered to the employees. Using a social ecology lens we illustrate how conceptualizing a step-counting campaign as a health promotion rather than a behavior change effort can have implications for what is construed as success.
Nanna Gorm, Irina Shklovski
CSCW1