Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maria Jahja

dblp:176/5125 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 60% Robot navigation and mapping · 40%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
constrained regression
0.412019
Kalman Filter, Sensor Fusion, and Constrained Regression: Equivalences and Insights · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian filtering
kalman filtering
0.412019
Kalman Filter, Sensor Fusion, and Constrained Regression: Equivalences and Insights · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression
0.412019
Kalman Filter, Sensor Fusion, and Constrained Regression: Equivalences and Insights · NeurIPS 2019
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion
0.412019
Kalman Filter, Sensor Fusion, and Constrained Regression: Equivalences and Insights · NeurIPS 2019
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation
0.412019
Kalman Filter, Sensor Fusion, and Constrained Regression: Equivalences and Insights · NeurIPS 2019
Medical and health informatics › public health › public health informatics
epidemic forecasting
0.112019
Kalman Filter, Sensor Fusion, and Constrained Regression: Equivalences and Insights · NeurIPS 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensor fusion · 0.8l1 penalization · 0.8kalman filter · 0.8constrained regression · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Kalman Filter, Sensor Fusion, and Constrained Regression: Equivalences and Insights
abstract
The Kalman filter (KF) is one of the most widely used tools for data assimilation and sequential estimation. In this work, we show that the state estimates from the KF in a standard linear dynamical system setting are equivalent to those given by the KF in a transformed system, with infinite process noise (i.e., a ``flat prior'') and an augmented measurement space. This reformulation---which we refer to as augmented measurement sensor fusion (SF)---is conceptually interesting, because the transformed system here is seemingly static (as there is effectively no process model), but we can still capture the state dynamics inherent to the KF by folding the process model into the measurement space. Further, this reformulation of the KF turns out to be useful in settings in which past states are observed eventually (at some lag). Here, when the measurement noise covariance is estimated by the empirical covariance, we show that the state predictions from SF are equivalent to those from a regression of past states on past measurements, subject to particular linear constraints (reflecting the relationships encoded in the measurement map). This allows us to port standard ideas (say, regularization methods) in regression over to dynamical systems. For example, we can posit multiple candidate process models, fold all of them into the measurement model, transform to the regression perspective, and apply $\ell_1$ penalization to perform process model selection. We give various empirical demonstrations, and focus on an application to nowcasting the weekly incidence of influenza in the US.
Maria Jahja, David C. Farrow, Ronald Rosenfeld, Ryan J. Tibshirani
NeurIPS1