Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shijin Rajakrishnan
dblp:176/5610
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 87% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 13% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network optimization and economics · 67% Datacenter networks · 33% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloud and datacenter computing
cluster resource management and scheduling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | From Switch Scheduling to Datacenter Scheduling: Matching-Coordinated Greed is Good · PODC 2022 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › job scheduling
datacenter scheduling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | From Switch Scheduling to Datacenter Scheduling: Matching-Coordinated Greed is Good · PODC 2022 |
Datacenter networks › flow scheduling
coflow scheduling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sincronia: near-optimal network design for coflows · SIGCOMM 2018 |
Network optimization and economics
network design |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sincronia: near-optimal network design for coflows · SIGCOMM 2018 |
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Sincronia: near-optimal network design for coflows · SIGCOMM 2018 |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › network scheduling
switch scheduling |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | From Switch Scheduling to Datacenter Scheduling: Matching-Coordinated Greed is Good · PODC 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
greedy matching · 0.6distributed bipartite matching · 0.6priority scheduling · 0.3per-flow rate allocation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | From Switch Scheduling to Datacenter Scheduling: Matching-Coordinated Greed is GoodabstractPacket scheduling over a switch (interconnect) fabric is a wellstudied problem in distributed computing, with known near-optimal distributed bipartite matching based protocols. Rachit Agarwal 0001, Shijin Rajakrishnan, David B. Shmoys |
PODC | 2 |
| 2021 | Approximability of open k-monopoly problems
Sounaka Mishra, B. Arjuna Krishna, Shijin Rajakrishnan |
Theory Comput. Syst. | 3 |
| 2018 | Sincronia: near-optimal network design for coflowsabstractWe present Sincronia, a near-optimal network design for coflows that can be implemented on top on any transport layer (for flows) that supports priority scheduling. Sincronia achieves this using a key technical result --- we show that given a "right" ordering of coflows, any per-flow rate allocation mechanism achieves average coflow completion time within 4X of the optimal as long as (co)flows are prioritized with respect to the ordering. Saksham Agarwal, Shijin Rajakrishnan, Akshay Narayan 0001, Rachit Agarwal 0001, David B. Shmoys, Amin Vahdat |
SIGCOMM | 2 |
| 2017 | On approximability of optimization problems related to Red/Blue-split graphs
Sounaka Mishra, Shijin Rajakrishnan, Saket Saurabh 0001 |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |
| 2016 | Lower bounds and optimal protocols for three-party secure computationabstractThe problem of three-party secure computation, where a function of private data of two parties is to be computed by a third party without revealing information beyond respective inputs or outputs is considered. New and better lower bounds on the amount of communication required between the parties to guarantee zero probability of error in the computation and achieve information-theoretic security are derived. Protocols are presented and proved to be optimal in some cases by showing that they achieve the improved lower bounds. Sundara Rajan S, Shijin Rajakrishnan, Andrew Thangaraj, Vinod M. Prabhakaran |
ISIT | 2 |