Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shijin Rajakrishnan

dblp:176/5610 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 87% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 13%
Computer networks
1 paper
Network optimization and economics · 67% Datacenter networks · 33%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing
cluster resource management and scheduling
0.612022
From Switch Scheduling to Datacenter Scheduling: Matching-Coordinated Greed is Good · PODC 2022
Cloud and datacenter computing › job scheduling
datacenter scheduling
0.612022
From Switch Scheduling to Datacenter Scheduling: Matching-Coordinated Greed is Good · PODC 2022
Datacenter networks › flow scheduling
coflow scheduling
0.312018
Sincronia: near-optimal network design for coflows · SIGCOMM 2018
Network optimization and economics
network design
0.312018
Sincronia: near-optimal network design for coflows · SIGCOMM 2018
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation
0.312018
Sincronia: near-optimal network design for coflows · SIGCOMM 2018
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › network scheduling
switch scheduling
0.212022
From Switch Scheduling to Datacenter Scheduling: Matching-Coordinated Greed is Good · PODC 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

greedy matching · 0.6distributed bipartite matching · 0.6priority scheduling · 0.3per-flow rate allocation · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 From Switch Scheduling to Datacenter Scheduling: Matching-Coordinated Greed is Good
abstract
Packet scheduling over a switch (interconnect) fabric is a wellstudied problem in distributed computing, with known near-optimal distributed bipartite matching based protocols.
Rachit Agarwal 0001, Shijin Rajakrishnan, David B. Shmoys
PODC2
2021 Approximability of open k-monopoly problems
Sounaka Mishra, B. Arjuna Krishna, Shijin Rajakrishnan
Theory Comput. Syst.3
2018 Sincronia: near-optimal network design for coflows
abstract
We present Sincronia, a near-optimal network design for coflows that can be implemented on top on any transport layer (for flows) that supports priority scheduling. Sincronia achieves this using a key technical result --- we show that given a "right" ordering of coflows, any per-flow rate allocation mechanism achieves average coflow completion time within 4X of the optimal as long as (co)flows are prioritized with respect to the ordering.
Saksham Agarwal, Shijin Rajakrishnan, Akshay Narayan 0001, Rachit Agarwal 0001, David B. Shmoys, Amin Vahdat
SIGCOMM2
2017 On approximability of optimization problems related to Red/Blue-split graphs
Sounaka Mishra, Shijin Rajakrishnan, Saket Saurabh 0001
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
2016 Lower bounds and optimal protocols for three-party secure computation
abstract
The problem of three-party secure computation, where a function of private data of two parties is to be computed by a third party without revealing information beyond respective inputs or outputs is considered. New and better lower bounds on the amount of communication required between the parties to guarantee zero probability of error in the computation and achieve information-theoretic security are derived. Protocols are presented and proved to be optimal in some cases by showing that they achieve the improved lower bounds.
Sundara Rajan S, Shijin Rajakrishnan, Andrew Thangaraj, Vinod M. Prabhakaran
ISIT2