Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

John L. Lake

dblp:177/0349 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › beamforming
adaptive beamforming
0.212016
Digital Phased Arrays: Challenges and Opportunities · Proc. IEEE 2016
Physical-layer communications › beamforming › beamforming architecture
digital beamforming
0.212016
Digital Phased Arrays: Challenges and Opportunities · Proc. IEEE 2016
Physical-layer communications › antenna arrays
phased array
0.212016
Digital Phased Arrays: Challenges and Opportunities · Proc. IEEE 2016
Physical-layer communications › signal processing for communications › array signal processing
array calibration
0.112016
Digital Phased Arrays: Challenges and Opportunities · Proc. IEEE 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distributed beamforming · 0.2digital array calibration · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Digital Phased Arrays: Challenges and Opportunities
abstract
Digital beamforming (DBF) has long been heralded as the next frontier in phased array technology, and not without reason. The digitization of transmit and receive signals at the element level opens the door to new processing and beamforming schemes and promises to deliver maximum flexibility and unprecedented dynamic range in large systems. However, it is not without inherent technological risks and practical challenges associated with the amount of data to process and the use of less sophisticated transceivers. This paper provides broad overviews of several interrelated aspects of the resulting DBF trade spaces for these systems. In particular, emerging concepts are highlighted for the roles and interconnection of distributed beamforming/processing for fixed and adaptive beamforming. These are then related to digital array calibration mechanisms that can potentially reduce the need for data- and processing-intensive beamforming algorithms.
Caleb Fulton, Mark B. Yeary, Daniel Thompson, John L. Lake, Adam Mitchell
Proc. IEEE4
2016 Adaptive Nullforming to Mitigate Ground Clutter on the National Weather Radar Testbed Phased Array Radar
abstract
With the decreasing cost of phased array antennas, their use for weather surveillance is becoming more practical. A significant advantage of phased arrays that can be applied to weather surveillance is spatial filtering. Using adaptive nullforming to spatially filter clutter is a novel approach to clutter mitigation, which is not possible with conventional parabolic reflector antennas. Moreover, spatial filtering is also applicable to phased-array-specific techniques such as beam multiplexing and adaptive scanning when only a few pulses are available for processing; this situation is particularly challenging for conventional ground clutter filters. The National Weather Radar Testbed Phased Array Radar (NWRT PAR) provides an opportunity to test some of these new capabilities. In this paper, a linearly constrained minimum power algorithm with an additional quadratic constraint is applied to weather data collected using the NWRT PAR and its multichannel receiver. Both the original algorithm and a recursive least squares version are utilized to show reflectivity and velocity data where both weather and ground clutter are present. Doppler spectra from selected range gates are examined to illustrate the performance of adaptive nullforming. Issues such as the number of samples needed to estimate the covariance matrix are explored. As far as we know, this is the first time that these types of techniques have been used to mitigate ground clutter contamination on a weather surveillance radar.
Christopher D. Curtis, Mark B. Yeary, John L. Lake
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.3