EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Heiko Lohrke
dblp:177/1393
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 3 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Hardware security and side channels · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware security and side channels › integrated circuit security
FPGA security |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | On the Power of Optical Contactless Probing: Attacking Bitstream Encryption of FPGAs · CCS 2017 No Place to Hide: Contactless Probing of Secret Data on FPGAs · CHES 2016 |
Hardware security and side channels
physical attacks |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | On the Power of Optical Contactless Probing: Attacking Bitstream Encryption of FPGAs · CCS 2017 |
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | No Place to Hide: Contactless Probing of Secret Data on FPGAs · CHES 2016 |
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs › FPGA security
bitstream protection |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | On the Power of Optical Contactless Probing: Attacking Bitstream Encryption of FPGAs · CCS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optical contactless probing · 0.6backside IC debug · 0.6contactless probing · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | On the Power of Optical Contactless Probing: Attacking Bitstream Encryption of FPGAsabstractModern Integrated Circuits (ICs) employ several classes of countermeasures to mitigate physical attacks. Recently, a powerful semi-invasive attack relying on optical contactless probing has been introduced, which can assist the attacker in circumventing the integrated countermeasures and probe the secret data on a chip. This attack can be mounted using IC debug tools from the backside of the chip. The first published attack based on this technique was conducted against a proof-of-concept hardware implementation on a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA). Therefore, the success of optical probing techniques against a real commercial device without any knowledge of the hardware implementation is still questionable. The aim of this work is to assess the threat of optical contactless probing in a real attack scenario. To this end, we conduct an optical probing attack against the bitstream encryption feature of a common FPGA. We demonstrate that the adversary is able to extract the plaintext data containing sensitive design information and intellectual property (IP). In contrast to previous optical attacks from the IC backside, our attack does not require any device preparation or silicon polishing, which makes it a non-invasive attack. Additionally, we debunk the myth that small technology sizes are unsusceptible to optical attacks, as we use an optical resolution of about 1 um to successfully attack a 28 nm device. Based on our time measurements, an attacker needs less than 10 working days to conduct the optical analysis and reverse-engineer the security-related parts of the hardware. Finally, we propose and discuss potential countermeasures, which could make the attack more challenging. Shahin Tajik, Heiko Lohrke, Jean-Pierre Seifert, Christian Boit |
CCS | 2 |
| 2017 | PUFMon: Security monitoring of FPGAs using physically unclonable functionsabstractMainstream FPGAs and programmable SoCs employ different countermeasures during configuration and runtime to mitigate physical attacks. However, it has been demonstrated that sophisticated active attack techniques, such as laser voltage probing, can still bypass the bitstream protections during the configuration phase. On the other hand, although the security monitoring IP cores provided by FPGA vendors can ensure the physical security during the runtime of applications, they are unable to detect such attacks during configuration. In this work, we propose a novel approach to using PUFs as physical sensors to monitor the integrity of FPGAs against active attacks. Small modifications in existing PUF architectures enable us to design a PUF-based security scheme, which can be deployed for integrity monitoring and authentication/key generation at the same time. We evaluate the effectiveness of our framework against a range of powerful attacks, such as optical probing and fault attacks. We further discuss how this scheme can be deployed during bitstream configuration in FPGAs with partial reconfiguration capability. Shahin Tajik, Julian Fietkau 0002, Heiko Lohrke, Jean-Pierre Seifert, Christian Boit |
IOLTS | 3 |
| 2016 | No Place to Hide: Contactless Probing of Secret Data on FPGAs
Heiko Lohrke, Shahin Tajik, Christian Boit, Jean-Pierre Seifert |
CHES | 1 |
| 2015 | Laser Fault Attack on Physically Unclonable FunctionsabstractPhysically Unclonable Functions (PUFs) are introduced to remedy the shortcomings of traditional methods of secure key storage and random key generation on Integrated Circuits (ICs). Due to their effective and low-cost implementations, intrinsic PUFs are popular PUF instances employed to improve the security of different applications on reconfigurable hardware. In this work we introduce a novel laser fault injection attack on intrinsic PUFs by manipulating the configuration of logic cells in a programable logic device. We present two fault attack scenarios, where not only the effectiveness of modeling attacks can be dramatically increased, but also the entropy of the targeted PUF responses are drastically decreased. In both cases, we conduct detailed theoretical analyses by considering XOR arbiter PUFs and RO PUFs as the examples of PUF-based authenticators and PUF-based random key generators, respectively. Finally we present our experimental results based on conducting laser fault injection on real PUFs, implemented on a common complex programmable logic device manufactured in 180 nm technology. Shahin Tajik, Heiko Lohrke, Fatemeh Ganji, Jean-Pierre Seifert, Christian Boit |
FDTC | 2 |