Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Soukayna Mouatadid

dblp:177/1896 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Approximation and online algorithms · 33% Mathematical optimization · 33% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 33%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Environmental and earth informatics · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Environmental and earth informatics › climate science
climate informatics
0.712023
SubseasonalClimateUSA: A Dataset for Subseasonal Forecasting and Benchmarking · NeurIPS 2023
Environmental and earth informatics › weather forecasting
subseasonal forecasting
0.712023
SubseasonalClimateUSA: A Dataset for Subseasonal Forecasting and Benchmarking · NeurIPS 2023
Information retrieval › evaluation
benchmark dataset
0.712023
SubseasonalClimateUSA: A Dataset for Subseasonal Forecasting and Benchmarking · NeurIPS 2023
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online convex optimization
0.512021
Online Learning with Optimism and Delay · ICML 2021
Approximation and online algorithms
online learning
0.512021
Online Learning with Optimism and Delay · ICML 2021
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
regret minimization
0.512021
Online Learning with Optimism and Delay · ICML 2021
Environmental and earth informatics
climate prediction
0.112021
Online Learning with Optimism and Delay · ICML 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

meteorological baseline · 2.0dynamical model · 2.0deep learning · 2.0optimistic online learning · 1.0meta-learning · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 SubseasonalClimateUSA: A Dataset for Subseasonal Forecasting and Benchmarking
abstract
Subseasonal forecasting of the weather two to six weeks in advance is critical for resource allocation and climate adaptation but poses many challenges for the forecasting community. At this forecast horizon, physics-based dynamical models have limited skill, and the targets for prediction depend in a complex manner on both local weather variables and global climate variables. Recently, machine learning methods have shown promise in advancing the state of the art but only at the cost of complex data curation, integrating expert knowledge with aggregation across multiple relevant data sources, file formats, and temporal and spatial resolutions.To streamline this process and accelerate future development, we introduce SubseasonalClimateUSA, a curated dataset for training and benchmarking subseasonal forecasting models in the United States. We use this dataset to benchmark a diverse suite of models, including operational dynamical models, classical meteorological baselines, and ten state-of-the-art machine learning and deep learning-based methods from the literature. Overall, our benchmarks suggest simple and effective ways to extend the accuracy of current operational models. SubseasonalClimateUSA is regularly updated and accessible via the https://github.com/microsoft/subseasonal_data/ Python package.
Soukayna Mouatadid, Paulo Orenstein, Genevieve Flaspohler, Miruna Oprescu, Judah Cohen, Franklyn Wang, Sean Knight, Maria Geogdzhayeva, Sam Levang, Ernest Fraenkel, Lester Mackey
NeurIPS1
2021 Online Learning with Optimism and Delay
abstract
Inspired by the demands of real-time climate and weather forecasting, we develop optimistic online learning algorithms that require no parameter tuning and have optimal regret guarantees under delayed feedback. Our algorithms—DORM, DORM+, and AdaHedgeD—arise from a novel reduction of delayed online learning to optimistic online learning that reveals how optimistic hints can mitigate the regret penalty caused by delay. We pair this delay-as-optimism perspective with a new analysis of optimistic learning that exposes its robustness to hinting errors and a new meta-algorithm for learning effective hinting strategies in the presence of delay. We conclude by benchmarking our algorithms on four subseasonal climate forecasting tasks, demonstrating low regret relative to state-of-the-art forecasting models.
Genevieve Flaspohler, Francesco Orabona, Judah Cohen, Soukayna Mouatadid, Miruna Oprescu, Paulo Orenstein, Lester Mackey
ICML4
2015 Prediction of SPEI Using MLR and ANN: A Case Study for Wilsons Promontory Station in Victoria
abstract
The prediction of drought is of major importance in climate-related studies, hydrologic engineering, wildlife or agricultural studies. This study explores the ability of two machine learning methods to predict 1, 3, 6 and 12 months standardized precipitation and evapotranspiration index (SPEI) for the Wilsons Promontory station in Eastern Australia. The two methods are multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural networks (ANN). The data-driven models were based on combinations of the input variables: mean precipitations, mean, maximum and minimum temperatures and evapotranspiration, for data between 1915 and 2012. Two performance metrics were used to compare the performance of the optimum MLR and ANN models: the coefficient of determination (R2) and the root mean square error (RMSE). It was found that ANN provided greater accuracy than MLR in forecasting the 1, 3, 6 and 12 months SPEI.
Soukayna Mouatadid, Ravinesh C. Deo, Jan Franklin Adamowski
ICMLA1