Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maximilian März
dblp:177/3315
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-6623-2467ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Generative modeling · 29% 3D vision · 29% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks - Robustness Included? · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Image and video processing
image reconstruction |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks - Robustness Included? · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
inverse problem |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks - Robustness Included? · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › inverse problem
deep learning for inverse problems |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep Learning · ICML 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction › volumetric reconstruction
tomographic reconstruction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep Learning · ICML 2022 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks - Robustness Included? · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › x-ray imaging
computed tomography |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep Learning · ICML 2022 |
Medical and health informatics
medical imaging |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep Learning · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
total variation minimization · 1.3deep neural network · 1.3adversarial attack · 1.3iterative end-to-end network · 1.1compressed sensing · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks - Robustness Included?abstractIn the past five years, deep learning methods have become state-of-the-art in solving various inverse problems. Before such approaches can find application in safety-critical fields, a verification of their reliability appears mandatory. Recent works have pointed out instabilities of deep neural networks for several image reconstruction tasks. In analogy to adversarial attacks in classification, it was shown that slight distortions in the input domain may cause severe artifacts. The present article sheds new light on this concern, by conducting an extensive study of the robustness of deep-learning-based algorithms for solving underdetermined inverse problems. This covers compressed sensing with Gaussian measurements as well as image recovery from Fourier and Radon measurements, including a real-world scenario for magnetic resonance imaging (using the NYU-fastMRI dataset). Our main focus is on computing adversarial perturbations of the measurements that maximize the reconstruction error. A distinctive feature of our approach is the quantitative and qualitative comparison with total-variation minimization, which serves as a provably robust reference method. In contrast to previous findings, our results reveal that standard end-to-end network architectures are not only resilient against statistical noise, but also against adversarial perturbations. All considered networks are trained by common deep learning techniques, without sophisticated defense strategies. Martin Genzel, Jan MacDonald, Maximilian März |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |
| 2022 | Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep LearningabstractThis work is concerned with the following fundamental question in scientific machine learning: Can deep-learning-based methods solve noise-free inverse problems to near-perfect accuracy? Positive evidence is provided for the first time, focusing on a prototypical computed tomography (CT) setup. We demonstrate that an iterative end-to-end network scheme enables reconstructions close to numerical precision, comparable to classical compressed sensing strategies. Our results build on our winning submission to the recent AAPM DL-Sparse-View CT Challenge. Its goal was to identify the state-of-the-art in solving the sparse-view CT inverse problem with data-driven techniques. A specific difficulty of the challenge setup was that the precise forward model remained unknown to the participants. Therefore, a key feature of our approach was to initially estimate the unknown fanbeam geometry in a data-driven calibration step. Apart from an in-depth analysis of our methodology, we also demonstrate its state-of-the-art performance on the open-access real-world dataset LoDoPaB CT. Martin Genzel, Ingo Gühring, Jan MacDonald, Maximilian März |
ICML | 4 |