Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Norman A. Rink

dblp:177/3789 · also Norman Alexander Rink · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-8591-5215ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training
0.912025
PartIR: Composing SPMD Partitioning Strategies for Machine Learning · ASPLOS (1) 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › parallelization
model partitioning
0.912025
PartIR: Composing SPMD Partitioning Strategies for Machine Learning · ASPLOS (1) 2025
Parallel and multicore computing
parallelization strategies
0.912025
PartIR: Composing SPMD Partitioning Strategies for Machine Learning · ASPLOS (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

schedule-like API · 1.7intermediate representation rewriting · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 PartIR: Composing SPMD Partitioning Strategies for Machine Learning
abstract
Training modern large neural networks (NNs) requires a combination of parallelization strategies, including data, model, or optimizer sharding. To address the growing complexity of these strategies, we introduce PartIR, a hardware-and-runtime agnostic NN partitioning system. PartIR is: 1) Expressive: It allows for the composition of multiple sharding strategies, whether user-defined or automatically derived; 2) Decoupled: the strategies are separate from the ML implementation; and 3) Predictable: It follows a set of well-defined general rules to partition the NN. PartIR utilizes a schedule-like API that incrementally rewrites the ML program intermediate representation (IR) after each strategy, allowing simulators and users to verify the strategy's performance. PartIR has been successfully used both for training large models and across diverse model architectures, demonstrating its predictability, expressiveness, and performance.
Sami Alabed, Daniel Belov, Bart Chrzaszcz, Juliana Franco, Dominik Grewe, Dougal Maclaurin, James Molloy, Tom Natan, Tamara Norman, Xiaoyue Pan, Adam Paszke, Norman A. Rink, Michael Schaarschmidt, Timur Sitdikov, Agnieszka Swietlik, Dimitrios Vytiniotis, Joel Wee
ASPLOS (1)12
2020 Optimizing Tensor Contractions for Embedded Devices with Racetrack and DRAM Memories
abstract
Tensor contraction is a fundamental operation in many algorithms with a plethora of applications ranging from quantum chemistry over fluid dynamics and image processing to machine learning. The performance of tensor computations critically depends on the efficient utilization of on-chip/off-chip memories. In the context of low-power embedded devices, efficient management of the memory space becomes even more crucial, in order to meet energy constraints. This work aims at investigating strategies for performance- and energy-efficient tensor contractions on embedded systems, using racetrack memory (RTM)-based scratch-pad memory (SPM) and DRAM-based off-chip memory. Compiler optimizations such as the loop access order and data layout transformations paired with architectural optimizations such as prefetching and preshifting are employed to reduce the shifting overhead in RTMs. Optimizations for off-chip memory such as memory access order, data mapping and the choice of a suitable memory access granularity are employed to reduce the contention in the off-chip memory. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed optimizations improve the SPM performance and energy consumption by 32% and 73%, respectively, compared to an iso-capacity SRAM. The overall DRAM dynamic energy consumption improvements due to memory optimizations amount to 80%.
Asif Ali Khan, Norman A. Rink, Fazal Hameed, Jerónimo Castrillón
ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst.2
2019 Optimizing tensor contractions for embedded devices with racetrack memory scratch-pads
abstract
Tensor contraction is a fundamental operation in many algorithms with a plethora of applications ranging from quantum chemistry over fluid dynamics and image processing to machine learning. The performance of tensor computations critically depends on the efficient utilization of on-chip memories. In the context of low-power embedded devices, efficient management of the memory space becomes even more crucial, in order to meet energy constraints. This work aims at investigating strategies for performance- and energy-efficient tensor contractions on embedded systems, using racetrack memory (RTM)-based scratch-pad memory (SPM). Compiler optimizations such as the loop access order and data layout transformations paired with architectural optimizations such as prefetching and preshifting are employed to reduce the shifting overhead in RTMs. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed optimizations improve the SPM performance and energy consumption by 24% and 74% respectively compared to an iso-capacity SRAM.
Asif Ali Khan, Norman A. Rink, Fazal Hameed, Jerónimo Castrillón
LCTES2
2018 Meta-programming for cross-domain tensor optimizations
abstract
Many modern application domains crucially rely on tensor operations. The optimization of programs that operate on tensors poses difficulties that are not adequately addressed by existing languages and tools. Frameworks such as TensorFlow offer good abstractions for tensor operations, but target a specific domain, i.e. machine learning, and their optimization strategies cannot easily be adjusted to other domains. General-purpose optimization tools such as Pluto and existing meta-languages offer more flexibility in applying optimizations but lack abstractions for tensors. This work closes the gap between domain-specific tensor languages and general-purpose optimization tools by proposing the Tensor optimizations Meta-Language (TeML). TeML offers high-level abstractions for both tensor operations and loop transformations, and enables flexible composition of transformations into effective optimization paths. This compositionality is built into TeML's design, as our formal language specification will reveal. We also show that TeML can express tensor computations as comfortably as TensorFlow and that it can reproduce Pluto's optimization paths. Thus, optimized programs generated by TeML execute at least as fast as the corresponding Pluto programs. In addition, TeML enables optimization paths that often allow outperforming Pluto.
Adilla Susungi, Norman A. Rink, Albert Cohen 0001, Jerónimo Castrillón, Claude Tadonki
GPCE2
2017 Towards compositional and generative tensor optimizations
abstract
Many numerical algorithms are naturally expressed as operations on tensors (i.e. multi-dimensional arrays). Hence, tensor expressions occur in a wide range of application domains, e.g. quantum chemistry and physics; big data analysis and machine learning; and computational fluid dynamics. Each domain, typically, has developed its own strategies for efficiently generating optimized code, supported by tools such as domain-specific languages, compilers, and libraries. However, strategies and tools are rarely portable between domains, and generic solutions typically act as ''black boxes'' that offer little control over code generation and optimization. As a consequence, there are application domains without adequate support for easily generating optimized code, e.g. computational fluid dynamics. In this paper we propose a generic and easily extensible intermediate language for expressing tensor computations and code transformations in a modular and generative fashion. Beyond being an intermediate language, our solution also offers meta-programming capabilities for experts in code optimization. While applications from the domain of computational fluid dynamics serve to illustrate our proposed solution, we believe that our general approach can help unify research in tensor optimizations and make solutions more portable between domains.
Adilla Susungi, Norman A. Rink, Jerónimo Castrillón, Immo Huismann, Albert Cohen 0001, Claude Tadonki, Jörg Stiller, Jochen Fröhlich
GPCE2