Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Martin Rohbeck
dblp:177/5239
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Modeling Complex System Dynamics with Flow Matching Across Time and Conditions · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis
single-cell genomics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Modeling Complex System Dynamics with Flow Matching Across Time and Conditions · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › guided diffusion
classifier-free guidance |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Modeling Complex System Dynamics with Flow Matching Across Time and Conditions · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Modeling Complex System Dynamics with Flow Matching Across Time and Conditions · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spline interpolation · 1.7neural network regression · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Modeling Complex System Dynamics with Flow Matching Across Time and ConditionsabstractModeling the dynamics of complex real-world systems from temporal snapshot data is crucial for understanding phenomena such as gene regulation, climate change, and financial market fluctuations. Researchers have recently proposed a few methods based either on the Schroedinger Bridge or Flow Matching to tackle this problem, but these approaches remain limited in their ability to effectively combine data from multiple time points and different experimental settings. This integration is essential in real-world scenarios where observations from certain combinations of time points and experimental conditions are missing, either because of experimental costs or sensory failure. To address this challenge, we propose a novel method named Multi-Marginal Flow Matching (MMFM). MMFM first constructs a flow using smooth spline-based interpolation across time points and conditions and regresses it with a neural network using the classifier-free guided Flow Matching framework. This framework allows for the sharing of contextual information about the dynamics across multiple trajectories. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on both synthetic and real-world datasets, including a recent single-cell genomics data set with around a hundred chemical perturbations across time points. Our results show that MMFM significantly outperforms existing methods at imputing data at missing time points. Martin Rohbeck, Edward De Brouwer, Charlotte Bunne, Jan-Christian Hütter, Anne Biton, Kelvin Y. Chen, Aviv Regev, Romain Lopez |
ICLR | 1 |