Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Francis Dutil

dblp:177/5993 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 45% Learning theory · 15% Generative modeling · 11%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.512021
Saliency is a Possible Red Herring When Diagnosing Poor Generalization · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.512021
Saliency is a Possible Red Herring When Diagnosing Poor Generalization · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.512021
Saliency is a Possible Red Herring When Diagnosing Poor Generalization · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
saliency methods
0.512021
Saliency is a Possible Red Herring When Diagnosing Poor Generalization · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning
0.412019
Dual Adversarial Inference for Text-to-Image Synthesis · ICCV 2019
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation
0.412019
Dual Adversarial Inference for Text-to-Image Synthesis · ICCV 2019
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
character-level translation
0.312017
Plan, Attend, Generate: Planning for Sequence-to-Sequence Models · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling › sequence generation
sequence-to-sequence generation
0.312017
Plan, Attend, Generate: Planning for Sequence-to-Sequence Models · NIPS 2017
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph traversal
eulerian circuits
0.112017
Plan, Attend, Generate: Planning for Sequence-to-Sequence Models · NIPS 2017
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms
0.112017
Plan, Attend, Generate: Planning for Sequence-to-Sequence Models · NIPS 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence-to-sequence learning · 0.6differentiable planning · 0.6attention mechanism · 0.6saliency analysis · 0.5latent variable disentanglement · 0.4adversarial inference · 0.4GAN · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 CMIM: Cross-Modal Information Maximization For Medical Imaging
abstract
In hospitals, data are siloed to specific information systems that make the same information available under different modalities such as the different medical imaging exams the patient undergoes (CT scans, MRI, PET, Ultrasound, etc.) and their associated radiology reports. This offers unique opportunities to obtain and use at train-time those multiple views of the same information that might not always be available at test-time.In this paper, we propose an innovative framework that makes the most of available data by learning good representations of a multi-modal input that are resilient to modality dropping at test-time, using recent advances in mutual information maximization. By maximizing cross-modal information at train time, we are able to outperform several state-of-the-art baselines in two different settings, medical image classification, and segmentation. In particular, our method is shown to have a strong impact on the inference-time performance of weaker modalities.
Tristan Sylvain, Francis Dutil, Tess Berthier, Lisa Di-Jorio, Margaux Luck, R. Devon Hjelm, Yoshua Bengio
ICASSP2
2021 Saliency is a Possible Red Herring When Diagnosing Poor Generalization
Joseph D. Viviano, Becks Simpson, Francis Dutil, Yoshua Bengio, Joseph Paul Cohen
ICLR3
2021 FoCL: Feature-oriented continual learning for generative models
Qicheng Lao, Mehrzad Mortazavi, Marzieh Tahaei, Francis Dutil, Thomas Fevens, Mohammad Havaei
Pattern Recognit.4
2019 Dual Adversarial Inference for Text-to-Image Synthesis
abstract
Synthesizing images from a given text description involves engaging two types of information: the content, which includes information explicitly described in the text (e.g., color, composition, etc.), and the style, which is usually not well described in the text (e.g., location, quantity, size, etc.). However, in previous works, it is typically treated as a process of generating images only from the content, i.e., without considering learning meaningful style representations. In this paper, we aim to learn two variables that are disentangled in the latent space, representing content and style respectively. We achieve this by augmenting current text-to-image synthesis frameworks with a dual adversarial inference mechanism. Through extensive experiments, we show that our model learns, in an unsupervised manner, style representations corresponding to certain meaningful information present in the image that are not well described in the text. The new framework also improves the quality of synthesized images when evaluated on Oxford-102, CUB and COCO datasets.
Qicheng Lao, Mohammad Havaei, Ahmad Pesaranghader, Francis Dutil, Lisa Di-Jorio, Thomas Fevens
ICCV4
2019 InfoMask: Masked Variational Latent Representation to Localize Chest Disease
Saeid Asgari Taghanaki, Mohammad Havaei, Tess Berthier, Francis Dutil, Lisa Di-Jorio, Ghassan Hamarneh, Yoshua Bengio
MICCAI (6)4
2017 Plan, Attend, Generate: Planning for Sequence-to-Sequence Models
abstract
We investigate the integration of a planning mechanism into sequence-to-sequence models using attention. We develop a model which can plan ahead in the future when it computes its alignments between input and output sequences, constructing a matrix of proposed future alignments and a commitment vector that governs whether to follow or recompute the plan. This mechanism is inspired by the recently proposed strategic attentive reader and writer (STRAW) model for Reinforcement Learning. Our proposed model is end-to-end trainable using primarily differentiable operations. We show that it outperforms a strong baseline on character-level translation tasks from WMT'15, the algorithmic task of finding Eulerian circuits of graphs, and question generation from the text. Our analysis demonstrates that the model computes qualitatively intuitive alignments, converges faster than the baselines, and achieves superior performance with fewer parameters.
Caglar Gulcehre, Francis Dutil, Adam Trischler, Yoshua Bengio
NIPS2
2017 ISLES 2015 - A public evaluation benchmark for ischemic stroke lesion segmentation from multispectral MRI
Oskar Maier, Bjoern Menze, Janina von der Gablentz, Levin Häni, Mattias P. Heinrich, Matthias Liebrand, Stefan Winzeck, Abdul Basit 0007, Paul Bentley, Liang Chen 0018, Daan Christiaens, Francis Dutil, Karl Egger, Chaolu Feng, Ben Glocker, Michael Götz, Tom Haeck, Hanna-Leena Halme, Mohammad Havaei, Khan M. Iftekharuddin, Pierre-Marc Jodoin
Medical Image Anal.12