Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Angad Rekhi
dblp:177/6202 · also Angad S. Rekhi, Angad Singh Rekhi
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-8618-3455ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 67% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 33% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 50% Image recognition and object detection · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
analog/mixed-signal accelerator |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analog/Mixed-Signal Hardware Error Modeling for Deep Learning Inference · DAC 2019 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
error modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analog/Mixed-Signal Hardware Error Modeling for Deep Learning Inference · DAC 2019 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › machine learning accelerator › inference accelerator
neural network inference accelerator |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analog/Mixed-Signal Hardware Error Modeling for Deep Learning Inference · DAC 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network inference
DNN inference |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Analog/Mixed-Signal Hardware Error Modeling for Deep Learning Inference · DAC 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification › large-scale image classification
imagenet classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Analog/Mixed-Signal Hardware Error Modeling for Deep Learning Inference · DAC 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quantization-aware retraining · 0.8batch normalization · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | CRADLE: Combined RF/Acoustic Detection and Localization of Passive TagsabstractWe introduce CRADLE, or combined RF/acoustic detection and localization, for the remote parametric ranging of passive tags. In this approach, a tag consists of an RF antenna connected to an ultrasonic transducer via a passive electrical network. A reader looks for tags by transmitting both continuous-wave RF and pulsed ultrasound into a region of interest; when a tag is within that region, the ultrasound incident on the tag transducer varies the transducer capacitance, creating a time-varying load for the tag antenna and thus parametrically modulating the RF waves reradiated from the tag. The reader localizes the tag by demodulating the received signal to recover the acoustic time of flight. In this paper, we present a proof-of-concept CRADLE system, describing the design of a custom tag and reader. The results of our localization experiments show that we can achieve sub-decimeter accuracy at reader-tag distances of up to 6 m using the proposed system; future improvements in the design of the tag and reader can result in localization of centimeter-sized tags with sub-centimeter accuracy out to distances of several meters. Angad Rekhi, Ernest So, Albert Gural, Amin Arbabian |
IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. | 1 |
| 2019 | Analog/Mixed-Signal Hardware Error Modeling for Deep Learning InferenceabstractAnalog/mixed-signal (AMS) computation can be more energy efficient than digital approaches for deep learning inference, but incurs an accuracy penalty from precision loss. Prior AMS approaches focus on small networks/datasets, which can maintain accuracy even with 2b precision. We analyze applicability of AMS approaches to larger networks by proposing a generic AMS error model, implementing it in an existing training framework, and investigating its effect on ImageNet classification with ResNet-50. We demonstrate significant accuracy recovery by exposing the network to AMS error during retraining, and we show that batch normalization layers are responsible for this accuracy recovery. We also introduce an energy model to predict the requirements of high-accuracy AMS hardware running large networks and use it to show that for ADC-dominated designs, there is a direct tradeoff between energy efficiency and network accuracy. Our model predicts that achieving < 0.4% accuracy loss on ResNet-50 with AMS hardware requires a computation energy of at least ~300 fJ/MAC. Finally, we propose methods for improving the energy-accuracy tradeoff. Angad Rekhi, Brian Zimmer, Nikola Nedovic, Ningxi Liu, Rangharajan Venkatesan, Miaorong Wang, Brucek Khailany, William J. Dally, C. Thomas Gray |
DAC | 1 |