Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Negin Salajegheh

dblp:177/8584 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Security and privacy · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Authentication and access control · 40% Systems and software security · 30% Malware analysis · 15%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Internet of things and sensor networks · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control › device authentication
iot authentication
0.312018
The House That Knows You: User Authentication Based on IoT Data · CCS 2018
Authentication and access control
user authentication
0.312018
The House That Knows You: User Authentication Based on IoT Data · CCS 2018
Privacy and data protection › information leakage
data leakage detection
0.212016
PIFT: Predictive Information-Flow Tracking · ASPLOS 2016
Systems and software security › information flow tracking
dynamic information flow tracking
0.212016
PIFT: Predictive Information-Flow Tracking · ASPLOS 2016
Systems and software security
information flow tracking
0.212016
PIFT: Predictive Information-Flow Tracking · ASPLOS 2016
Malware analysis
mobile malware detection
0.212016
PIFT: Predictive Information-Flow Tracking · ASPLOS 2016
Internet of things and sensor networks
smart home
0.112018
The House That Knows You: User Authentication Based on IoT Data · CCS 2018
Program analysis › dynamic analysis › instrumentation
binary instrumentation
0.112016
PIFT: Predictive Information-Flow Tracking · ASPLOS 2016
Program analysis
dynamic analysis
0.112016
PIFT: Predictive Information-Flow Tracking · ASPLOS 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

network traffic analysis · 0.7LSTM · 0.7predictive information-flow tracking · 0.5memory load and store monitoring · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 The House That Knows You: User Authentication Based on IoT Data
abstract
Home-based Internet of Things (IoT) devices have gained in popularity and many households became "smart'' by using devices such as smart sensors, locks, and voice-based assistants. Given the limitations of existing authentication techniques, we explore new opportunities for user authentication in smart home environments. Specifically, we design a novel authentication method in IoT-enabled smart homes. We perform initial experiments and a user study leveraging network traffic collected from 8 IoT devices in our university lab. Preliminary results show that our LSTM model achieves a maximum accuracy of 75% in identifying users.
Talha Ongun, Alina Oprea, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, Mihai Christodorescu, Negin Salajegheh
CCS5
2016 PIFT: Predictive Information-Flow Tracking
abstract
Phones today carry sensitive information and have a great number of ways to communicate that data. As a result, malware that steal money, information, or simply disable functionality have hit the app stores. Current security solutions for preventing undesirable data leaks are mostly high-overhead and have not been practical enough for smartphones. In this paper, we show that simply monitoring just some instructions (only memory loads and stores) it is possible to achieve low overhead, highly accurate information flow tracking. Our method achieves 98% accuracy (0% false positive and 2% false negative) over DroidBench and was able to successfully catch seven real-world malware instances that steal phone number, location, and device ID using SMS messages and HTTP connections.
Man-Ki Yoon, Negin Salajegheh, Yin Chen 0002, Mihai Christodorescu
ASPLOS2