Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
James McQueen
dblp:177/8867
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0008-6636-8488ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 53% Reinforcement learning · 47% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 72% Algorithms and data structures · 28% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 77% Information retrieval · 23% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › causal inference
online controlled experiments |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Effect Size Estimation for Duration Recommendation in Online Experiments: Leveraging Hierarchical Models and Objective Utility Approaches · AAAI 2024 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › decision theory
utility theory |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Effect Size Estimation for Duration Recommendation in Online Experiments: Leveraging Hierarchical Models and Objective Utility Approaches · AAAI 2024 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › dimensionality reduction › nonlinear dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Improved Graph Laplacian via Geometric Self-Consistency · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Nearly Isometric Embedding by Relaxation · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
isometric embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Nearly Isometric Embedding by Relaxation · NIPS 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Nearly Isometric Embedding by Relaxation · NIPS 2016 |
Information retrieval › evaluation › online evaluation
a/b testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Effect Size Estimation for Duration Recommendation in Online Experiments: Leveraging Hierarchical Models and Objective Utility Approaches · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
utility theory · 1.5gaussian mixture model · 1.5hierarchical models · 0.8hierarchical model · 0.8meta-analysis · 0.7bayesian decision theory · 0.7riemannian geometry · 0.3laplace-beltrami operator · 0.3riemannian metric · 0.2push-forward metric · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Effect Size Estimation for Duration Recommendation in Online Experiments: Leveraging Hierarchical Models and Objective Utility ApproachesabstractThe selection of the assumed effect size (AES) critically determines the duration of an experiment, and hence its accuracy and efficiency. Traditionally, experimenters determine AES based on domain knowledge. However, this method becomes impractical for online experimentation services managing numerous experiments, and a more automated approach is hence of great demand. We initiate the study of data-driven AES selection in for online experimentation services by introducing two solutions. The first employs a three-layer Gaussian Mixture Model considering the heteroskedasticity across experiments, and it seeks to estimate the true expected effect size among positive experiments. The second method, grounded in utility theory, aims to determine the optimal effect size by striking a balance between the experiment's cost and the precision of decision-making. Through comparisons with baseline methods using both simulated and real data, we showcase the superior performance of the proposed approaches. Yu Liu 0080, Runzhe Wan, James McQueen, Doug Hains, Jinxiang Gu, Rui Song 0006 |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2023 | Experimentation Platforms Meet Reinforcement Learning: Bayesian Sequential Decision-Making for Continuous MonitoringabstractWith the growing needs of online A/B testing to support the innovation in industry, the opportunity cost of running an experiment becomes non-negligible. Therefore, there is an increasing demand for an efficient continuous monitoring service that allows early stopping when appropriate. Classic statistical methods focus on hypothesis testing and are mostly developed for traditional high-stake problems such as clinical trials, while experiments at online service companies typically have very different features and focuses. Motivated by the real needs, in this paper, we introduce a novel framework that we developed in Amazon to maximize customer experience and control opportunity cost. We formulate the problem as a Bayesian optimal sequential decision making problem that has a unified utility function. We discuss extensively practical design choices and considerations. We further introduce how to solve the optimal decision rule via Reinforcement Learning and scale the solution. We show the effectiveness of this novel approach compared with existing methods via a large-scale meta-analysis on experiments in Amazon. Runzhe Wan, Yu Liu 0080, James McQueen, Doug Hains, Rui Song 0006 |
KDD | 3 |
| 2022 | A Bayesian Model for Online Activity Sample SizesabstractIn many contexts it is useful to predict the number of individuals in some population who will initiate a particular activity during a given period. For example, the number of users who will install a software update, the number of customers who will use a new feature on a website or who will participate in an A/B test. In practical settings, there is heterogeneity amongst individuals with regard to the distribution of time until they will initiate. For these reasons it is inappropriate to assume that the number of new individuals observed on successive days will be identically distributed. Given observations on the number of unique users participating in an initial period, we present a simple but novel Bayesian method for predicting the number of additional individuals who will participate during a subsequent period. We illustrate the performance of the method in predicting sample size in online experimentation. Thomas Richardson 0001, Yu Liu 0080, James McQueen, Doug Hains |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2017 | Improved Graph Laplacian via Geometric Self-ConsistencyabstractWe address the problem of setting the kernel bandwidth, epps, used by Manifold Learning algorithms to construct the graph Laplacian. Exploiting the connection between manifold geometry, represented by the Riemannian metric, and the Laplace-Beltrami operator, we set epps by optimizing the Laplacian's ability to preserve the geometry of the data. Experiments show that this principled approach is effective and robust Dominique C. Perrault-Joncas, Marina Meila, James McQueen |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2016 | Nearly Isometric Embedding by RelaxationabstractMany manifold learning algorithms aim to create embeddings with low or no distortion (i.e. isometric). If the data has intrinsic dimension d, it is often impossible to obtain an isometric embedding in d dimensions, but possible in s > d dimensions. Yet, most geometry preserving algorithms cannot do the latter. This paper proposes an embedding algorithm that overcomes this problem. The algorithm directly computes, for any data embedding Y, a distortion loss(Y), and iteratively updates Y in order to decrease it. The distortion measure we propose is based on the push-forward Riemannian metric associated with the coordinates Y. The experiments confirm the superiority of our algorithm in obtaining low distortion embeddings. James McQueen, Marina Meila, Dominique C. Perrault-Joncas |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2016 | Megaman: Scalable Manifold Learning in PythonabstractManifold Learning (ML) is a class of algorithms seeking a low-dimensional non-linear representation of high-dimensional data. Thus, ML algorithms are most applicable to high- dimensional data and require large sample sizes to accurately estimate the manifold. Despite this, most existing manifold learning implementations are not particularly scalable. Here we present a Python package that implements a variety of manifold learning algorithms in a modular and scalable fashion, using fast approximate neighbors searches and fast sparse eigendecompositions. The package incorporates theoretical advances in manifold learning, such as the unbiased Laplacian estimator introduced by Coifman and Lafon (2006) and the estimation of the embedding distortion by the Riemannian metric method introduced by Perrault-Joncas and Meila (2013). In benchmarks, even on a single-core desktop computer, our code embeds millions of data points in minutes, and takes just 200 minutes to embed the main sample of galaxy spectra from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey--- consisting of 0.6 million samples in 3750-dimensions---a task which has not previously been possible. James McQueen, Marina Meila, Jacob VanderPlas |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |