Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Antonios A. Chariton

dblp:178/2033 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 67% Authentication and access control · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management › public key infrastructure
certificate revocation
0.312017
CCSP: A compressed certificate status protocol · INFOCOM 2017
Authentication and access control › certificate management
certificate revocation checking
0.312017
CCSP: A compressed certificate status protocol · INFOCOM 2017
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key management
public key infrastructure
0.312017
CCSP: A compressed certificate status protocol · INFOCOM 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

signed collections · 0.3OCSP · 0.3CRLs · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Design and Implementation of a Compressed Certificate Status Protocol
abstract
Trust in Secure Sockets Layer–based communications is traditionally provided by Certificate (or Certification) Authorities (CAs) in the form of signed certificates. Checking the validity of a certificate involves three steps: (i) checking its expiration date, (ii) verifying its signature, and (iii) ensuring that it is not revoked. Currently, such certificate revocation checks (i.e., step (iii) above) are done either via Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs), or Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) servers. Unfortunately, despite the existence of these revocation checks, sophisticated cyber-attackers can still trick web browsers to trust a revoked certificate, believing that it is still valid. Although frequently updated , nonced , and timestamped certificates can reduce the frequency and impact of such cyber-attacks, they add a huge burden to the CAs and OCSP servers. Indeed, CAs and/or OCSP servers need to timestamp and sign on a regular basis all the responses, for every certificate they have issued, resulting in a very high overhead. To mitigate this and provide a solution to the described cyber-attacks, we present CCSP : a new approach to provide timely information regarding the status of certificates, which capitalizes on a newly introduced notion called Signed Collections . In this article, we present in detail the notion of Signed Collections and the complete design, implementation, and evaluation of our approach. Performance evaluation shows that CCSP (i) reduces space requirements by more than an order of magnitude, (ii) lowers the number of signatures required by six orders of magnitude compared to OCSP-based methods, and (iii) adds only a few milliseconds of overhead in the overall user latency.
Michalis Pachilakis, Antonios A. Chariton, Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Panagiotis Ilia, Eirini Degkleri, Evangelos P. Markatos
ACM Trans. Internet Techn.2
2018 Where's Wally?: How to Privately Discover your Friends on the Internet
abstract
Internet friends who would like to connect with each other (e.g., VoIP, chat) use point-to-point communication applications such as Skype or WhatsApp. Apart from providing the necessary communication channel, these applications also facilitate contact discovery, where users upload their address-book and learn the network address of their friends. Although handy, this discovery process comes with a significant privacy cost: users are forced to reveal to the service provider every person they are socially connected with, even if they do not ever communicate with them through the app. In this paper, we show that it is possible to implement a scalable User Discovery service, without requiring any centralized entity that users have to blindly trust. Specifically, we distribute the maintenance of the users» contact information, and allow their friends to query for it, just as they normally query the network for machine services. We implement our approach in PROUD: a distributed privacy-preserving User Discovery service, which capitalizes on DNS. The prevalence of DNS makes PROUD immediately applicable, able to scale to millions of users. Preliminary evaluation shows that PROUD provides competitive performance for all practical purposes, imposing an overhead of less than 0.3 sec per operation.
Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Antonios A. Chariton, Elias Athanasopoulos, Evangelos P. Markatos
AsiaCCS2
2017 CCSP: A compressed certificate status protocol
abstract
Trust in SSL-based communications is provided by Certificate Authorities (CAs) in the form of signed certificates. Checking the validity of a certificate involves three steps: (i) checking its expiration date, (ii) verifying its signature, and (iii) ensuring that it is not revoked. Currently, such certificate revocation checks are done either via Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs) or Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) servers. Unfortunately, despite the existence of these revocation checks, sophisticated cyber-attackers, may trick web browsers to trust a revoked certificate, believing that it is still valid. Consequently, the web browser will communicate (over TLS) with web servers controlled by cyber-attackers. Although frequently updated, nonced, and timestamped certificates may reduce the frequency and impact of such cyber-attacks, they impose a very large overhead to the CAs and OCSP servers, which now need to timestamp and sign on a regular basis all the responses, for every certificate they have issued, resulting in a very high overhead. To mitigate this overhead and provide a solution to the described cyber-attacks, we present CCSP: a new approach to provide timely information regarding the status of certificates, which capitalizes on a newly introduced notion called signed collections. In this paper, we present the design, preliminary implementation, and evaluation of CCSP in general, and signed collections in particular. Our preliminary results suggest that CCSP (i) reduces space requirements by more than an order of magnitude, (ii) lowers the number of signatures required by 6 orders of magnitude compared to OCSP-based methods, and (iii) adds only a few milliseconds of overhead in the overall user latency.
Antonios A. Chariton, Eirini Degkleri, Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Panagiotis Ilia, Evangelos P. Markatos
INFOCOM1