While gaining popularity in mobile devices, F2FS, a flash-friendly variation of log-structured file system, reveals three drawbacks: segment cleaning overhead, metadata update overhead, and file fragmentation, which becomes conspicuous under random update workloads. This paper suggests for the first time to leverage the address-remap technique in flash storage to remedy such pitfalls in F2FS. Our approach can, while preserving the benefit of log-structured writes, achieve the eventual effect of in-place update, completely preventing three drawbacks of F2FS. It can thus significantly outperform ext4 as well as vanilla F2FS under random update workloads. Armed with another write mode, F2FS will become competitive for a wider range of applications.

Storage I/O performance remains a key factor that determines the overall user experience of a computer system. This is especially true for mobile systems as users commonly browse and navigate through many high-quality pictures and video clips stored in their device. The appetite for more appealing user interface has continuously pushed the mobile storage interface speed up; emerging UFS 2.0 standard provisions a maximum bandwidth of as high as 1,200 MB/s. In this work, we propose, design, and implement a mobile storage architecture that leverages the high-speed DRAM interface for communication, thus substantially expanding the storage performance headroom. In order to effectively turn the existing DRAM interface into a storage interface, we design a new storage protocol that runs on top of the DRAM interface. Our protocol builds on a small host interface buffer structure mapped to the system's memory space. Based on this protocol, we develop and fabricate a storage controller chip that natively supports the LPDDR3 interface. We also develop a host software stack (Linux device driver and boot loader) and a host platform board. Finally we show the feasibility of our proposal by constructing a full Android system running on the developed storage device and platform. Our detailed evaluation shows that the proposed storage architecture has very low protocol handling overheads and compares favorably to a UFS 2.0 device. The proposed architecture obviates the need for implementing a separate host-side storage controller on a mobile CPU chip.