Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jessa Bekker
dblp:178/3249
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-1928-7374ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 27% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 26% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ProbLog4Fairness: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Modeling and Mitigating Bias · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ProbLog4Fairness: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Modeling and Mitigating Bias · AAAI 2026 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic programming
probabilistic logic programming |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | ProbLog4Fairness: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Modeling and Mitigating Bias · AAAI 2026 |
Knowledge graphs
link prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Unifying Knowledge Base Completion with PU Learning to Mitigate the Observation Bias · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
class prior estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Estimating the Class Prior in Positive and Unlabeled Data Through Decision Tree Induction · AAAI 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph reasoning
knowledge base completion |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Estimating the Class Prior in Positive and Unlabeled Data Through Decision Tree Induction · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
positive-unlabeled learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Estimating the Class Prior in Positive and Unlabeled Data Through Decision Tree Induction · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal model
probabilistic causal models |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | ProbLog4Fairness: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Modeling and Mitigating Bias · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Tractable Learning for Complex Probability Queries · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Tractable Learning for Complex Probability Queries · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
tractable probabilistic model |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Tractable Learning for Complex Probability Queries · NIPS 2015 |
Medical and health informatics
clinical diagnosis |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Estimating the Class Prior in Positive and Unlabeled Data Through Decision Tree Induction · AAAI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic logic programming · 1.0neuro-symbolic learning · 1.0top-down induction · 0.7decision tree induction · 0.7propensity scoring · 0.6PU learning · 0.6sentential decision diagrams · 0.2arithmetic circuits · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | ProbLog4Fairness: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Modeling and Mitigating BiasabstractOperationalizing definitions of fairness is difficult in practice, as multiple definitions can be incompatible while each being arguably desirable. Instead, it may be easier to directly describe algorithmic bias through ad-hoc assumptions specific to a particular real-world task, e.g., based on background information on systemic biases in its context. Such assumptions can, in turn, be used to mitigate this bias during training. Yet, a framework for incorporating such assumptions that is simultaneously principled, flexible, and interpretable is currently lacking. Our approach is to formalize bias assumptions as programs in ProbLog, a probabilistic logic programming language that allows for the description of probabilistic causal relationships through logic. Neurosymbolic extensions of ProbLog then allow for easy integration of these assumptions in a neural network's training process. We propose a set of templates to express different types of bias and show the versatility of our approach on synthetic tabular datasets with known biases. Using estimates of the bias distortions present, we also succeed in mitigating algorithmic bias in real-world tabular and image data. We conclude that ProbLog4Fairness outperforms baselines due to its ability to flexibly model the relevant bias assumptions, where other methods typically uphold a fixed bias type or notion of fairness. Rik Adriaensen, Lucas Van Praet, Jessa Bekker, Robin Manhaeve, Pieter Delobelle, Maarten Buyl |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2025 | Learning from biased positive-unlabeled data via threshold calibrationabstractLearning from positive and unlabeled data (PU learning) aims to train a binary classification model when only positive and unlabeled examples are available. Typically, learners assume that there is a labeling mechanism that determines which positive labels are observed. A particularly challenging setting arises when the observed positive labels are a biased sample from the positive distribution. Current approaches either require estimating the propensity scores, which are the instance-specific probabilities that a positive example’s label will be observed, or make overly restricting assumptions about the labeling mechanism. We make a novel assumption about the labeling mechanism which we show is more general than several commonly used existing ones. Moreover, the combination of our novel assumption and theoretical results from robust statistics can simplify the process of learning from biased PU data. Empirically, our approach offers superior predictive and run time performance compared to the state-of-the-art methods. Pawel Teisseyre, Timo Martens, Jessa Bekker, Jesse Davis |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2025 | Correction to: Modeling PU learning using probabilistic logic programming
Victor Verreet, Luc De Raedt, Jessa Bekker |
Mach. Learn. | 3 |
| 2024 | Modeling PU learning using probabilistic logic programming
Victor Verreet, Luc De Raedt, Jessa Bekker |
Mach. Learn. | 3 |
| 2022 | Unifying Knowledge Base Completion with PU Learning to Mitigate the Observation BiasabstractMethods for Knowledge Base Completion (KBC) reason about a knowledge base (KB) in order to derive new facts that should be included in the KB. This is challenging for two reasons. First, KBs only contain positive examples. This complicates model evaluation which needs both positive and negative examples. Second, those facts that were selected to be included in the knowledge base, are most likely not an i.i.d. sample of the true facts, due to the way knowledge bases are constructed. In this paper, we focus on rule-based approaches, which traditionally address the first challenge by making assumptions that enable identifying negative examples, which in turn makes it possible to compute a rule's confidence or precision. However, they largely ignore the second challenge, which means that their estimates of a rule's confidence can be biased. This paper approaches rule-based KBC through the lens of PU-learning, which can cope with both challenges. We make three contributions.: (1) We provide a unifying view that formalizes the relationship between multiple existing confidences measures based on (i) what assumption they make about and (ii) how their accuracy depends on the selection mechanism. (2) We introduce two new confidence measures that can mitigate known biases by using propensity scores that quantify how likely a fact is to be included the KB. (3) We show through theoretical and empirical analysis that taking the bias into account improves the confidence estimates, even when the propensity scores are not known exactly. Jonas Schouterden, Jessa Bekker, Jesse Davis, Hendrik Blockeel |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2022 | Interactive Multi-Level Prosody Control for Expressive Speech SynthesisabstractRecent neural-based text-to-speech (TTS) models are able to produce highly natural speech. To synthesize expressive speech, the prosody of the speech has to be modeled, and predicted/controlled during synthesis. However, intuitive control over prosody remains elusive. Some techniques only allow control over the global style of the speech and do not allow fine-grained adjustments. Other techniques create fine-grained prosody embeddings, but these are difficult to manipulate to obtain a desired speaking style. We thus present ConEx, a novel model for expressive speech synthesis, which can produce speech in a certain speaking style, while also allowing local adjustments to the prosody of the generated speech. The model builds upon the non-autoregressive architecture of FastSpeech and includes a reference encoder to learn global prosody embeddings, and a vector quantized variational autoencoder to create fine-grained prosody embeddings. To realize prosody manipulation, a new interactive method is proposed. Experiments on two datasets show that the model enables multi-level prosody control. Tobias Cornille, Fengna Wang, Jessa Bekker |
ICASSP | 3 |
| 2020 | Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a survey
Jessa Bekker, Jesse Davis |
Mach. Learn. | 1 |
| 2019 | Beyond the Selected Completely at Random Assumption for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data
Jessa Bekker, Pieter Robberechts, Jesse Davis |
ECML/PKDD (2) | 1 |
| 2018 | Estimating the Class Prior in Positive and Unlabeled Data Through Decision Tree InductionabstractFor tasks such as medical diagnosis and knowledge base completion, a classifier may only have access to positive and unlabeled examples, where the unlabeled data consists of both positive and negative examples. One way that enables learning from this type of data is knowing the true class prior. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective method for estimating the class prior, by estimating the probability that a positive example is selected to be labeled. Our key insight is that subdomains of the data give a lower bound on this probability. This lower bound gets closer to the real probability as the ratio of labeled examples increases. Finding such subsets can naturally be done via top-down decision tree induction. Experiments show that our method makes estimates which are equivalently accurate as those of the state of the art methods, and is an order of magnitude faster. Jessa Bekker, Jesse Davis |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2017 | Positive and Unlabeled Relational Classification Through Label Frequency Estimation
Jessa Bekker, Jesse Davis |
ILP | 1 |
| 2017 | Learning the Structure of Probabilistic Sentential Decision Diagrams
Yitao Liang, Jessa Bekker, Guy Van den Broeck |
UAI | 2 |
| 2015 | Tractable Learning for Complex Probability QueriesabstractTractable learning aims to learn probabilistic models where inference is guaranteed to be efficient. However, the particular class of queries that is tractable depends on the model and underlying representation. Usually this class is MPE or conditional probabilities $\Pr(\xs|\ys)$ for joint assignments~$\xs,\ys$. We propose a tractable learner that guarantees efficient inference for a broader class of queries. It simultaneously learns a Markov network and its tractable circuit representation, in order to guarantee and measure tractability. Our approach differs from earlier work by using Sentential Decision Diagrams (SDD) as the tractable language instead of Arithmetic Circuits (AC). SDDs have desirable properties, which more general representations such as ACs lack, that enable basic primitives for Boolean circuit compilation. This allows us to support a broader class of complex probability queries, including counting, threshold, and parity, in polytime. Jessa Bekker, Jesse Davis, Arthur Choi, Adnan Darwiche, Guy Van den Broeck |
NIPS | 1 |