Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jessa Bekker

dblp:178/3249 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-1928-7374ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 40% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 27% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 26%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
bias mitigation
1.012026
ProbLog4Fairness: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Modeling and Mitigating Bias · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
1.012026
ProbLog4Fairness: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Modeling and Mitigating Bias · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic programming
probabilistic logic programming
1.012026
ProbLog4Fairness: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Modeling and Mitigating Bias · AAAI 2026
Knowledge graphs
link prediction
0.612022
Unifying Knowledge Base Completion with PU Learning to Mitigate the Observation Bias · AAAI 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
class prior estimation
0.312018
Estimating the Class Prior in Positive and Unlabeled Data Through Decision Tree Induction · AAAI 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph reasoning
knowledge base completion
0.312018
Estimating the Class Prior in Positive and Unlabeled Data Through Decision Tree Induction · AAAI 2018
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
positive-unlabeled learning
0.312018
Estimating the Class Prior in Positive and Unlabeled Data Through Decision Tree Induction · AAAI 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal model
probabilistic causal models
0.312026
ProbLog4Fairness: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Modeling and Mitigating Bias · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.212015
Tractable Learning for Complex Probability Queries · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field
0.212015
Tractable Learning for Complex Probability Queries · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
tractable probabilistic model
0.212015
Tractable Learning for Complex Probability Queries · NIPS 2015
Medical and health informatics
clinical diagnosis
0.112018
Estimating the Class Prior in Positive and Unlabeled Data Through Decision Tree Induction · AAAI 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic logic programming · 1.0neuro-symbolic learning · 1.0top-down induction · 0.7decision tree induction · 0.7propensity scoring · 0.6PU learning · 0.6sentential decision diagrams · 0.2arithmetic circuits · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 ProbLog4Fairness: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Modeling and Mitigating Bias
abstract
Operationalizing definitions of fairness is difficult in practice, as multiple definitions can be incompatible while each being arguably desirable. Instead, it may be easier to directly describe algorithmic bias through ad-hoc assumptions specific to a particular real-world task, e.g., based on background information on systemic biases in its context. Such assumptions can, in turn, be used to mitigate this bias during training. Yet, a framework for incorporating such assumptions that is simultaneously principled, flexible, and interpretable is currently lacking. Our approach is to formalize bias assumptions as programs in ProbLog, a probabilistic logic programming language that allows for the description of probabilistic causal relationships through logic. Neurosymbolic extensions of ProbLog then allow for easy integration of these assumptions in a neural network's training process. We propose a set of templates to express different types of bias and show the versatility of our approach on synthetic tabular datasets with known biases. Using estimates of the bias distortions present, we also succeed in mitigating algorithmic bias in real-world tabular and image data. We conclude that ProbLog4Fairness outperforms baselines due to its ability to flexibly model the relevant bias assumptions, where other methods typically uphold a fixed bias type or notion of fairness.
Rik Adriaensen, Lucas Van Praet, Jessa Bekker, Robin Manhaeve, Pieter Delobelle, Maarten Buyl
AAAI3
2025 Learning from biased positive-unlabeled data via threshold calibration
abstract
Learning from positive and unlabeled data (PU learning) aims to train a binary classification model when only positive and unlabeled examples are available. Typically, learners assume that there is a labeling mechanism that determines which positive labels are observed. A particularly challenging setting arises when the observed positive labels are a biased sample from the positive distribution. Current approaches either require estimating the propensity scores, which are the instance-specific probabilities that a positive example’s label will be observed, or make overly restricting assumptions about the labeling mechanism. We make a novel assumption about the labeling mechanism which we show is more general than several commonly used existing ones. Moreover, the combination of our novel assumption and theoretical results from robust statistics can simplify the process of learning from biased PU data. Empirically, our approach offers superior predictive and run time performance compared to the state-of-the-art methods.
Pawel Teisseyre, Timo Martens, Jessa Bekker, Jesse Davis
AISTATS3
2025 Correction to: Modeling PU learning using probabilistic logic programming
Victor Verreet, Luc De Raedt, Jessa Bekker
Mach. Learn.3
2024 Modeling PU learning using probabilistic logic programming
Victor Verreet, Luc De Raedt, Jessa Bekker
Mach. Learn.3
2022 Unifying Knowledge Base Completion with PU Learning to Mitigate the Observation Bias
abstract
Methods for Knowledge Base Completion (KBC) reason about a knowledge base (KB) in order to derive new facts that should be included in the KB. This is challenging for two reasons. First, KBs only contain positive examples. This complicates model evaluation which needs both positive and negative examples. Second, those facts that were selected to be included in the knowledge base, are most likely not an i.i.d. sample of the true facts, due to the way knowledge bases are constructed. In this paper, we focus on rule-based approaches, which traditionally address the first challenge by making assumptions that enable identifying negative examples, which in turn makes it possible to compute a rule's confidence or precision. However, they largely ignore the second challenge, which means that their estimates of a rule's confidence can be biased. This paper approaches rule-based KBC through the lens of PU-learning, which can cope with both challenges. We make three contributions.: (1) We provide a unifying view that formalizes the relationship between multiple existing confidences measures based on (i) what assumption they make about and (ii) how their accuracy depends on the selection mechanism. (2) We introduce two new confidence measures that can mitigate known biases by using propensity scores that quantify how likely a fact is to be included the KB. (3) We show through theoretical and empirical analysis that taking the bias into account improves the confidence estimates, even when the propensity scores are not known exactly.
Jonas Schouterden, Jessa Bekker, Jesse Davis, Hendrik Blockeel
AAAI2
2022 Interactive Multi-Level Prosody Control for Expressive Speech Synthesis
abstract
Recent neural-based text-to-speech (TTS) models are able to produce highly natural speech. To synthesize expressive speech, the prosody of the speech has to be modeled, and predicted/controlled during synthesis. However, intuitive control over prosody remains elusive. Some techniques only allow control over the global style of the speech and do not allow fine-grained adjustments. Other techniques create fine-grained prosody embeddings, but these are difficult to manipulate to obtain a desired speaking style. We thus present ConEx, a novel model for expressive speech synthesis, which can produce speech in a certain speaking style, while also allowing local adjustments to the prosody of the generated speech. The model builds upon the non-autoregressive architecture of FastSpeech and includes a reference encoder to learn global prosody embeddings, and a vector quantized variational autoencoder to create fine-grained prosody embeddings. To realize prosody manipulation, a new interactive method is proposed. Experiments on two datasets show that the model enables multi-level prosody control.
Tobias Cornille, Fengna Wang, Jessa Bekker
ICASSP3
2020 Learning from positive and unlabeled data: a survey
Jessa Bekker, Jesse Davis
Mach. Learn.1
2019 Beyond the Selected Completely at Random Assumption for Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data
Jessa Bekker, Pieter Robberechts, Jesse Davis
ECML/PKDD (2)1
2018 Estimating the Class Prior in Positive and Unlabeled Data Through Decision Tree Induction
abstract
For tasks such as medical diagnosis and knowledge base completion, a classifier may only have access to positive and unlabeled examples, where the unlabeled data consists of both positive and negative examples. One way that enables learning from this type of data is knowing the true class prior. In this paper, we propose a simple yet effective method for estimating the class prior, by estimating the probability that a positive example is selected to be labeled. Our key insight is that subdomains of the data give a lower bound on this probability. This lower bound gets closer to the real probability as the ratio of labeled examples increases. Finding such subsets can naturally be done via top-down decision tree induction. Experiments show that our method makes estimates which are equivalently accurate as those of the state of the art methods, and is an order of magnitude faster.
Jessa Bekker, Jesse Davis
AAAI1
2017 Positive and Unlabeled Relational Classification Through Label Frequency Estimation
Jessa Bekker, Jesse Davis
ILP1
2017 Learning the Structure of Probabilistic Sentential Decision Diagrams
Yitao Liang, Jessa Bekker, Guy Van den Broeck
UAI2
2015 Tractable Learning for Complex Probability Queries
abstract
Tractable learning aims to learn probabilistic models where inference is guaranteed to be efficient. However, the particular class of queries that is tractable depends on the model and underlying representation. Usually this class is MPE or conditional probabilities $\Pr(\xs|\ys)$ for joint assignments~$\xs,\ys$. We propose a tractable learner that guarantees efficient inference for a broader class of queries. It simultaneously learns a Markov network and its tractable circuit representation, in order to guarantee and measure tractability. Our approach differs from earlier work by using Sentential Decision Diagrams (SDD) as the tractable language instead of Arithmetic Circuits (AC). SDDs have desirable properties, which more general representations such as ACs lack, that enable basic primitives for Boolean circuit compilation. This allows us to support a broader class of complex probability queries, including counting, threshold, and parity, in polytime.
Jessa Bekker, Jesse Davis, Arthur Choi, Adnan Darwiche, Guy Van den Broeck
NIPS1