EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Guillaume P. Dehaene
dblp:178/3255
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 75% Learning theory · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Bounding errors of Expectation-Propagation · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › approximation theory
approximation error bound |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Bounding errors of Expectation-Propagation · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
expectation propagation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Bounding errors of Expectation-Propagation · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Bounding errors of Expectation-Propagation · NIPS 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
kullback-leibler divergence · 0.2asymptotic expansion · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Investigating the representation of uncertainty in neuronal circuitsabstractSkilled behavior often displays signatures of Bayesian inference. In order for the brain to implement the required computations, neuronal activity must carry accurate information about the uncertainty of sensory inputs. Two major approaches have been proposed to study neuronal representations of uncertainty. The first one, the Bayesian decoding approach, aims primarily at decoding the posterior probability distribution of the stimulus from population activity using Bayes' rule, and indirectly yields uncertainty estimates as a by-product. The second one, which we call the correlational approach, searches for specific features of neuronal activity (such as tuning-curve width and maximum firing-rate) which correlate with uncertainty. To compare these two approaches, we derived a new normative model of sound source localization by Interaural Time Difference (ITD), that reproduces a wealth of behavioral and neural observations. We found that several features of neuronal activity correlated with uncertainty on average, but none provided an accurate estimate of uncertainty on a trial-by-trial basis, indicating that the correlational approach may not reliably identify which aspects of neuronal responses represent uncertainty. In contrast, the Bayesian decoding approach reveals that the activity pattern of the entire population was required to reconstruct the trial-to-trial posterior distribution with Bayes' rule. These results suggest that uncertainty is unlikely to be represented in a single feature of neuronal activity, and highlight the importance of using a Bayesian decoding approach when exploring the neural basis of uncertainty. Guillaume P. Dehaene, Ruben Coen Cagli, Alexandre Pouget |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2015 | Bounding errors of Expectation-PropagationabstractExpectation Propagation is a very popular algorithm for variational inference, but comes with few theoretical guarantees. In this article, we prove that the approximation errors made by EP can be bounded. Our bounds have an asymptotic interpretation in the number n of datapoints, which allows us to study EP's convergence with respect to the true posterior. In particular, we show that EP converges at a rate of $O(n^{-2})$ for the mean, up to an order of magnitude faster than the traditional Gaussian approximation at the mode. We also give similar asymptotic expansions for moments of order 2 to 4, as well as excess Kullback-Leibler cost (defined as the additional KL cost incurred by using EP rather than the ideal Gaussian approximation). All these expansions highlight the superior convergence properties of EP. Our approach for deriving those results is likely applicable to many similar approximate inference methods. In addition, we introduce bounds on the moments of log-concave distributions that may be of independent interest. Guillaume P. Dehaene, Simon Barthelmé |
NIPS | 1 |