Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

William S. Mohn Jr.

dblp:178/3805 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1971
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Speech recognition and synthesis · 33% Learning theory · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
feature selection
0.011971
Two Statistical Feature Evaluation Techniques Applied to Speaker Identification · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speaker recognition
speaker identification
0.011971
Two Statistical Feature Evaluation Techniques Applied to Speaker Identification · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical pattern recognition
0.011971
Two Statistical Feature Evaluation Techniques Applied to Speaker Identification · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical feature evaluation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1971 Two Statistical Feature Evaluation Techniques Applied to Speaker Identification
abstract
The problem of identifying people based solely upon samples of their speech is viewed as a statistical pattern classification problem, emphasizing the portion of the process in which an informative, concise set of features is extracted from the speech signal. This work takes into account both the limited amount of data available in a real application and the statistical dependence among the various proposed features. In addition, the results of feature evaluation should apply to speakers not involved in the evaluation set.
William S. Mohn Jr.
IEEE Trans. Computers1