Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Samuel Cohen

dblp:178/7326 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
6since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Reinforcement learning · 30% Generative modeling · 30% Optimization for machine learning · 26%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport
1.732023
Meta Optimal Transport · ICML 2023
Cross-Domain Imitation Learning via Optimal Transport · ICLR 2022
Riemannian Convex Potential Maps · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
1.222023
Optimal Transport for Offline Imitation Learning · ICLR 2023
Cross-Domain Imitation Learning via Optimal Transport · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
offline imitation learning
0.712023
Optimal Transport for Offline Imitation Learning · ICLR 2023
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport
0.712023
Optimal Transport for Offline Imitation Learning · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
continuous normalizing flow
0.612022
Matching Normalizing Flows and Probability Paths on Manifolds · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › transfer imitation learning
cross-domain imitation learning
0.612022
Cross-Domain Imitation Learning via Optimal Transport · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling › normalizing flow
normalizing flows on manifolds
0.612022
Matching Normalizing Flows and Probability Paths on Manifolds · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration
0.412020
Healing Products of Gaussian Process Experts · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.412020
Healing Products of Gaussian Process Experts · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model › probabilistic generative model
product of experts
0.412020
Healing Products of Gaussian Process Experts · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.412020
Healing Products of Gaussian Process Experts · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning
0.212023
Optimal Transport for Offline Imitation Learning · ICLR 2023
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design
logic design
0.011969
Threshold Gate Building Blocks · IEEE Trans. Computers 1969
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis
0.011969
Threshold Gate Building Blocks · IEEE Trans. Computers 1969
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design
threshold logic
0.011969
Threshold Gate Building Blocks · IEEE Trans. Computers 1969

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimal transport · 2.3optimal transport solvers · 0.7amortized optimization · 0.7ordinary differential equation · 0.6logarithmic mass conservation · 0.6normalizing flow · 0.5convex potentials · 0.5wasserstein barycenter · 0.4tempered softmax · 0.4asymmetric threshold gate design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Optimal Transport for Offline Imitation Learning
Yicheng Luo, Zhengyao Jiang, Samuel Cohen, Edward Grefenstette, Marc Peter Deisenroth
ICLR3
2023 Meta Optimal Transport
abstract
We study the use of amortized optimization to predict optimal transport (OT) maps from the input measures, which we call Meta OT. This helps repeatedly solve similar OT problems between different measures by leveraging the knowledge and information present from past problems to rapidly predict and solve new problems. Otherwise, standard methods ignore the knowledge of the past solutions and suboptimally re-solve each problem from scratch. We instantiate Meta OT models in discrete and continuous settings between grayscale images, spherical data, classification labels, and color palettes and use them to improve the computational time of standard OT solvers. Our source code is available at http://github.com/facebookresearch/meta-ot
Brandon Amos, Giulia Luise, Samuel Cohen, Ievgen Redko
ICML3
2022 Cross-Domain Imitation Learning via Optimal Transport
Arnaud Fickinger, Samuel Cohen, Stuart Russell 0001, Brandon Amos
ICLR2
2022 Matching Normalizing Flows and Probability Paths on Manifolds
abstract
Continuous Normalizing Flows (CNFs) are a class of generative models that transform a prior distribution to a model distribution by solving an ordinary differential equation (ODE). We propose to train CNFs on manifolds by minimizing probability path divergence (PPD), a novel family of divergences between the probability density path generated by the CNF and a target probability density path. PPD is formulated using a logarithmic mass conservation formula which is a linear first order partial differential equation relating the log target probabilities and the CNF’s defining vector field. PPD has several key benefits over existing methods: it sidesteps the need to solve an ODE per iteration, readily applies to manifold data, scales to high dimensions, and is compatible with a large family of target paths interpolating pure noise and data in finite time. Theoretically, PPD is shown to bound classical probability divergences. Empirically, we show that CNFs learned by minimizing PPD achieve state-of-the-art results in likelihoods and sample quality on existing low-dimensional manifold benchmarks, and is the first example of a generative model to scale to moderately high dimensional manifolds.
Heli Ben-Hamu, Samuel Cohen, Joey Bose, Brandon Amos, Maximilian Nickel, Aditya Grover, Ricky T. Q. Chen, Yaron Lipman
ICML2
2021 Aligning Time Series on Incomparable Spaces
abstract
Dynamic time warping (DTW) is a useful method for aligning, comparing and combining time series, but it requires them to live in comparable spaces. In this work, we consider a setting in which time series live on different spaces without a sensible ground metric, causing DTW to become ill-defined. To alleviate this, we propose Gromov dynamic time warping (GDTW), a distance between time series on potentially incomparable spaces that avoids the comparability requirement by instead considering intra-relational geometry. We demonstrate its effectiveness at aligning, combining and comparing time series living on incomparable spaces. We further propose a smoothed version of GDTW as a differentiable loss and assess its properties in a variety of settings, including barycentric averaging, generative modeling and imitation learning.
Samuel Cohen, Giulia Luise, Alexander Terenin, Brandon Amos, Marc Peter Deisenroth
AISTATS1
2021 Riemannian Convex Potential Maps
abstract
Modeling distributions on Riemannian manifolds is a crucial component in understanding non-Euclidean data that arises, e.g., in physics and geology. The budding approaches in this space are limited by representational and computational tradeoffs. We propose and study a class of flows that uses convex potentials from Riemannian optimal transport. These are universal and can model distributions on any compact Riemannian manifold without requiring domain knowledge of the manifold to be integrated into the architecture. We demonstrate that these flows can model standard distributions on spheres, and tori, on synthetic and geological data.
Samuel Cohen, Brandon Amos, Yaron Lipman
ICML1
2020 Healing Products of Gaussian Process Experts
abstract
Gaussian processes (GPs) are nonparametric Bayesian models that have been applied to regression and classification problems. One of the approaches to alleviate their cubic training cost is the use of local GP experts trained on subsets of the data. In particular, product-of-expert models combine the predictive distributions of local experts through a tractable product operation. While these expert models allow for massively distributed computation, their predictions typically suffer from erratic behaviour of the mean or uncalibrated uncertainty quantification. By calibrating predictions via a tempered softmax weighting, we provide a solution to these problems for multiple product-of-expert models, including the generalised product of experts and the robust Bayesian committee machine. Furthermore, we leverage the optimal transport literature and propose a new product-of-expert model that combines predictions of local experts by computing their Wasserstein barycenter, which can be applied to both regression and classification.
Samuel Cohen, Rendani Mbuvha, Tshilidzi Marwala, Marc Peter Deisenroth
ICML1
2019 Multi-Graph Decoding for Code-Switching ASR
abstract
\n Contains fulltext :\n 214606.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access)\n
Emre Yilmaz 0001, Samuel Cohen, Xianghu Yue, David A. van Leeuwen, Haizhou Li 0001
INTERSPEECH2
1969 Threshold Gate Building Blocks
abstract
The problem of choosing a standard circuit package with which to realize a given logic design can be solved for threshold logic design by the use of majority gates. However, the use of asymmetric threshold gates allows substantial improvements in the amount of logic done per signal pin of the circuit package. Examples are given, illustrating savings in logic design effort, total cost of integrated circuit packages, and total cost of printed circuit boards.
Samuel Cohen, Robert O. Winder
IEEE Trans. Computers1