Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Maxim Egorov

dblp:178/8623 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 47% Reinforcement learning · 19% Robot navigation and mapping · 17%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process
0.522017
POMDPs.jl: A Framework for Sequential Decision Making under Uncertainty · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Target Surveillance in Adversarial Environments Using POMDPs · AAAI 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.312017
POMDPs.jl: A Framework for Sequential Decision Making under Uncertainty · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
target monitoring
0.212016
Target Surveillance in Adversarial Environments Using POMDPs · AAAI 2016
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › decision making under uncertainty
sequential decision making under uncertainty
0.112017
POMDPs.jl: A Framework for Sequential Decision Making under Uncertainty · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty › partially observable markov decision process
mixed observability markov decision process
0.112016
Target Surveillance in Adversarial Environments Using POMDPs · AAAI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

level-k policy · 0.2MOMDP · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Efficiency and Fairness in Unmanned Air Traffic Flow Management
abstract
As the demand for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) operations increases, UAS Traffic Flow Management (UTFM) initiatives are needed to mitigate congestion, and to ensure safety and efficiency. Congestion mitigation can be achieved by assigning airborne delays (through speed changes or path stretches) or ground delays (holds relative to the desired takeoff times) to aircraft. While the assignment of such delays may increase system efficiency, individual aircraft operators may be unfairly impacted. Dynamic traffic demand, variability in aircraft operator preferences, and differences in the market share of operators complicate the issue of fairness in UTFM. Our work considers the fairness of delay assignment in the context of UTFM. To this end, we formulate the UTFM problem with fairness and show through computational experiments that significant improvements in fairness can be attained at little cost to system efficiency. We demonstrate that when operators are not aligned in how they perceive or value fairness, there is a decrease in the overall fairness of the solution. We find that fairness decreases as the air-ground delay cost ratio increases and that it improves when the operator with dominant market share has a weak preference for the fairness of its allocated delays. Finally, we implemented UTFM in a rolling-horizon setting with dynamic traffic demand, and find that efficiency is adversely impacted. However, the impact on fairness is varied and depends on the metric used.
Christopher Chin, Karthik Gopalakrishnan 0002, Maxim Egorov, Antony Evans, Hamsa Balakrishnan
IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.3
2017 POMDPs.jl: A Framework for Sequential Decision Making under Uncertainty
abstract
POMDPs.jl is an open-source framework for solving Markov decision processes (MDPs) and partially observable MDPs (POMDPs). POMDPs.jl allows users to specify sequential decision making problems with minimal effort without sacrificing the expressive nature of POMDPs, making this framework viable for both educational and research purposes. It is written in the Julia language to allow flexible prototyping and large-scale computation that leverages the high-performance nature of the language. The associated JuliaPOMDP community also provides a number of state-of-the-art MDP and POMDP solvers and a rich library of support tools to help with implementing new solvers and evaluating the solution results. The most recent version of POMDPs.jl, the related packages, and documentation can be found at github.com/ JuliaPOMDP/POMDPs.jl.
Maxim Egorov, Zachary Sunberg, Edward Balaban, Tim Allan Wheeler, Jayesh K. Gupta, Mykel J. Kochenderfer
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2016 Target Surveillance in Adversarial Environments Using POMDPs
abstract
This paper introduces an extension of the target surveillance problem in which the surveillance agent is exposed to an adversarial ballistic threat. The problem is formulated as a mixed observability Markov decision process (MOMDP), which is a factored variant of the partially observable Markov decision process, to account for state and dynamic uncertainties. The control policy resulting from solving the MOMDP aims to optimize the frequency of target observations and minimize exposure to the ballistic threat. The adversary’s behavior is modeled with a level-k policy, which is used to construct the state transition of the MOMDP. The approach is empirically evaluated against a MOMDP adversary and against a human opponent in a target surveillance computer game. The empirical results demonstrate that, on average, level 3 MOMDP policies outperform lower level reasoning policies as well as human players.
Maxim Egorov, Mykel J. Kochenderfer, Jaak J. Uudmae
AAAI1