Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nazgol Tavabi
dblp:178/8627
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8877-622XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 88% Web and social media mining · 12% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Systems and software security · 100% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › pattern mining
behavioral pattern mining |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Modeling Dynamic Behaviors within Population · AAAI 2020 |
Data mining
temporal data mining |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Modeling Dynamic Behaviors within Population · AAAI 2020 |
Systems and software security › vulnerability management
exploit prediction |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | DarkEmbed: Exploit Prediction With Neural Language Models · AAAI 2018 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability management |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | DarkEmbed: Exploit Prediction With Neural Language Models · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network
bayesian network classifiers |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Structured Features in Naive Bayes Classification · AAAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Structured Features in Naive Bayes Classification · AAAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network › bayesian network classifiers
naive bayes |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Structured Features in Naive Bayes Classification · AAAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › tractable probabilistic model
probabilistic sentential decision diagram |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Structured Features in Naive Bayes Classification · AAAI 2016 |
Web and social media mining › user behavior analysis
social media behavior analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Modeling Dynamic Behaviors within Population · AAAI 2020 |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
sensor data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Modeling Dynamic Behaviors within Population · AAAI 2020 |
Data mining
anomaly detection |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Structured Features in Naive Bayes Classification · AAAI 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
time series modeling · 0.9structured features · 0.5probabilistic sentential decision diagram · 0.5word embeddings · 0.3neural language model · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Building large-scale registries from unstructured clinical notes using a low-resource natural language processing pipeline
Nazgol Tavabi, James D. Pruneski, Shahriar Golchin, Mallika Singh, Ryan Sanborn, Benton Heyworth, Assaf Landschaft, Amir A. Kimia, Ata M. Kiapour |
Artif. Intell. Medicine | 1 |
| 2020 | Modeling Dynamic Behaviors within PopulationabstractThe abundance of temporal data generated by mankind in recent years gives us the opportunity to better understand human behaviors along with the similarities and differences in groups of people. Better understanding of human behaviors could be very beneficial in choosing strategies, from group-level to society-level depending on the domain. This type of data could range from physiological data collected from sensors to activity patterns in social media. Identifying frequent behavioral patterns in sensor data could give more insight into the health of a community and provoke strategies towards improving it; By analyzing patterns of behaviors in social media, platform's attributes could be adjusted to the user's needs.This type of modeling introduces numerous challenges that varies depending on the data. The goal of my doctoral research is to introduce ways to better understand and capture human behavior by modeling individual's behaviors as time series and extracting interesting patterns within them. Nazgol Tavabi |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2018 | DarkEmbed: Exploit Prediction With Neural Language ModelsabstractSoftware vulnerabilities can expose computer systems to attacks by malicious actors. With the number of vulnerabilities discovered in the recent years surging, creating timely patches for every vulnerability is not always feasible. At the same time, not every vulnerability will be exploited by attackers; hence, prioritizing vulnerabilities by assessing the likelihood they will be exploited has become an important research problem. Recent works used machine learning techniques to predict exploited vulnerabilities by analyzing discussions about vulnerabilities on social media. These methods relied on traditional text processing techniques, which represent statistical features of words, but fail to capture their context. To address this challenge, we propose DarkEmbed, a neural language modeling approach that learns low dimensional distributed representations, i.e., embeddings, of darkweb/deepweb discussions to predict whether vulnerabilities will be exploited. By capturing linguistic regularities of human language, such as syntactic, semantic similarity and logic analogy, the learned embeddings are better able to classify discussions about exploited vulnerabilities than traditional text analysis methods. Evaluations demonstrate the efficacy of learned embeddings on both structured text (such as security blog posts) and unstructured text (darkweb/deepweb posts). DarkEmbed outperforms state-of-the-art approaches on the exploit prediction task with an F1-score of 0.74. Nazgol Tavabi, Palash Goyal, Mohammed Almukaynizi, Paulo Shakarian, Kristina Lerman |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2016 | Structured Features in Naive Bayes ClassificationabstractWe propose the structured naive Bayes (SNB) classifier, which augments the ubiquitous naive Bayes classifier with structured features. SNB classifiers facilitate the use of complex features, such as combinatorial objects (e.g., graphs, paths and orders) in a general but systematic way. Underlying the SNB classifier is the recently proposed Probabilistic Sentential Decision Diagram (PSDD), which is a tractable representation of probability distributions over structured spaces. We illustrate the utility and generality of the SNB classifier via case studies. First, we show how we can distinguish players of simple games in terms of play style and skill level based purely on observing the games they play. Second, we show how we can detect anomalous paths taken on graphs based purely on observing the paths themselves. Arthur Choi, Nazgol Tavabi, Adnan Darwiche |
AAAI | 2 |