Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Lucas Thompson
dblp:178/8655
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › plan execution
plan execution monitoring |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Detection of Plan Deviation in Multi-Agent Systems · AAAI 2016 |
Computing education
AI education |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Model AI Assignments 2014 · AAAI 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
expectation-maximization · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Detection of Plan Deviation in Multi-Agent SystemsabstractPlan monitoring in a collaborative multi-agent system requires an agent to not only monitor the execution of its own plan, but also to detect possible deviations or failures in the plan execution of its teammates. In domains featuring partial observability and uncertainty in the agents’ sensing and actuation, especially where communication among agents is sparse (as a part of a cost-minimized plan), plan monitoring can be a significant challenge. We design an Expectation Maximization (EM) based algorithm for detection of plan deviation of teammates in such a multi-agent system. However, a direct implementation of this algorithm is intractable, so we also design an alternative approach grounded on the agents’ plans, for tractability. We establish its equivalence to the intractable version, and evaluate these techniques in some challenging tasks. Bikramjit Banerjee, Steven Loscalzo, Daniel Lucas Thompson |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2014 | Model AI Assignments 2014abstractThe Model AI Assignments session seeks to gather and disseminate the best assignment designs of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education community. Recognizing that assignments form the core of student learning experience, we here present abstracts of five AI assignments from the 2014 session that are easily adoptable, playfully engaging, and flexible for a variety of instructor needs. Assignment specifications and supporting resources may be found at http://modelai.gettysburg.edu. Todd W. Neller, Laura E. Brown, Roger L. West, James E. Heliotis, Sean Strout, Ivona Bezáková, Bikramjit Banerjee, Daniel Lucas Thompson |
AAAI | 8 |