Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yae Jee Cho
dblp:179/2081
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
6as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-6075-2712ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 76% Learning paradigms · 10% Optimization for machine learning · 7% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Edge and fog computing · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
2.7 | 4 | 2024 | Heterogeneous LoRA for Federated Fine-tuning of On-Device Foundation Models · EMNLP 2024 On the Convergence of Federated Averaging with Cyclic Client Participation · ICML 2023 Local or Global: Selective Knowledge Assimilation for Federated Learning with Limited Labels · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › federated foundation model
federated foundation model fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Heterogeneous LoRA for Federated Fine-tuning of On-Device Foundation Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › parameter-efficient fine-tuning
low-rank adaptation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Heterogeneous LoRA for Federated Fine-tuning of On-Device Foundation Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Heterogeneous LoRA for Federated Fine-tuning of On-Device Foundation Models · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Convergence of Federated Averaging with Cyclic Client Participation · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › model aggregation
federated averaging |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | On the Convergence of Federated Averaging with Cyclic Client Participation · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning › label-efficient federated learning
federated semi-supervised learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Local or Global: Selective Knowledge Assimilation for Federated Learning with Limited Labels · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
pseudo-labeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Local or Global: Selective Knowledge Assimilation for Federated Learning with Limited Labels · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Heterogeneous Ensemble Knowledge Transfer for Training Large Models in Federated Learning · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
knowledge transfer |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Heterogeneous Ensemble Knowledge Transfer for Training Large Models in Federated Learning · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
consistency regularization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Local or Global: Selective Knowledge Assimilation for Federated Learning with Limited Labels · ICCV 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sparsity-weighted aggregation · 1.5rank self-pruning · 1.5low-rank adaptation · 1.5stochastic gradient descent · 0.7pseudo-labeling · 0.7global-local consistency regularization · 0.7convergence analysis · 0.7knowledge distillation · 0.6ensemble learning · 0.6diversity regularization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Heterogeneous LoRA for Federated Fine-tuning of On-Device Foundation ModelsabstractFoundation models (FMs) adapt surprisingly well to downstream tasks with fine-tuning.However, their colossal parameter space prohibits their training on resource-constrained edge-devices.For federated fine-tuning, we need to consider the smaller FMs of few billion parameters at most, namely on-device FMs (ODFMs), which can be deployed ondevice.Federated fine-tuning of ODFMs has unique challenges non-present in standard fine-tuning: i) ODFMs poorly generalize to downstream tasks due to their limited sizes making proper fine-tuning imperative to their performance, and ii) devices have limited and heterogeneous system capabilities and data that can deter the performance of fine-tuning.Tackling these challenges, we propose HET-LORA, a feasible and effective federated finetuning method for ODFMs that leverages the system and data heterogeneity at the edge.HETLORA allows heterogeneous LoRA ranks across clients for their individual system resources, and efficiently aggregates and distributes these LoRA modules in a data-aware manner by applying rank self-pruning locally and sparsity-weighted aggregation at the server.It combines the advantages of high and low-rank LoRAs, achieving improved convergence speed and final performance compared to homogeneous LoRA.Furthermore, HET-LORA has enhanced computation and communication efficiency compared to full finetuning making it more feasible for the edge. Yae Jee Cho, Zheng Xu 0002, Aldi Fahrezi, Gauri Joshi |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2023 | Local or Global: Selective Knowledge Assimilation for Federated Learning with Limited LabelsabstractMany existing FL methods assume clients with fully-labeled data, while in realistic settings, clients have limited labels due to the expensive and laborious process of labeling. Limited labeled local data of the clients often leads to their local model having poor generalization abilities to their larger unlabeled local data, such as having class-distribution mismatch with the unlabeled data. As a result, clients may instead look to benefit from the global model trained across clients to leverage their unlabeled data, but this also becomes difficult due to data heterogeneity across clients. In our work, we propose FedLabel where clients selectively choose the local or global model to pseudo-label their unlabeled data depending on which is more of an expert of the data. We further utilize both the local and global models’ knowledge via global-local consistency regularization which minimizes the divergence between the two models’ outputs when they have identical pseudo-labels for the unlabeled data. Unlike other semi-supervised FL baselines, our method does not require additional experts other than the local or global model, nor require additional parameters to be communicated. We also do not assume any server-labeled data or fully labeled clients. For both cross-device and cross-silo settings, we show that FedLabel outperforms other semi-supervised FL baselines by 8-24%, and even outperforms standard fully supervised FL baselines (100% labeled data) with only 5-20% of labeled data. Yae Jee Cho, Gauri Joshi, Dimitrios Dimitriadis |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2023 | On the Convergence of Federated Averaging with Cyclic Client ParticipationabstractFederated Averaging (FedAvg) and its variants are the most popular optimization algorithms in federated learning (FL). Previous convergence analyses of FedAvg either assume full client participation or partial client participation where the clients can be uniformly sampled. However, in practical cross-device FL systems, only a subset of clients that satisfy local criteria such as battery status, network connectivity, and maximum participation frequency requirements (to ensure privacy) are available for training at a given time. As a result, client availability follows a *natural cyclic pattern*. We provide (to our knowledge) the first theoretical framework to analyze the convergence of FedAvg with cyclic client participation with several different client optimizers such as GD, SGD, and shuffled SGD. Our analysis discovers that cyclic client participation can achieve a faster asymptotic convergence rate than vanilla FedAvg with uniform client participation under suitable conditions, providing valuable insights into the design of client sampling protocols. Yae Jee Cho, Pranay Sharma, Gauri Joshi, Zheng Xu 0002, Satyen Kale, Tong Zhang 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Towards Understanding Biased Client Selection in Federated LearningabstractFederated learning is a distributed optimization paradigm that enables a large number of resource-limited client nodes to cooperatively train a model without data sharing. Previous works analyzed the convergence of federated learning by accounting of data heterogeneity, communication/computation limitations, and partial client participation. However, most assume unbiased client participation, where clients are selected such that the aggregated model update is unbiased. In our work, we present the convergence analysis of federated learning with biased client selection and quantify how the bias affects convergence speed. We show that biasing client selection towards clients with higher local loss yields faster error convergence. From this insight, we propose Power-of-Choice, a communication- and computation-efficient client selection framework that flexibly spans the trade-off between convergence speed and solution bias. Extensive experiments demonstrate that Power-of-Choice can converge up to 3 times faster and give $10%$ higher test accuracy than the baseline random selection. Yae Jee Cho, Gauri Joshi |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2022 | Heterogeneous Ensemble Knowledge Transfer for Training Large Models in Federated LearningabstractFederated learning (FL) enables edge-devices to collaboratively learn a model without disclosing their private data to a central aggregating server. Most existing FL algorithms require models of identical architecture to be deployed across the clients and server, making it infeasible to train large models due to clients' limited system resources. In this work, we propose a novel ensemble knowledge transfer method named Fed-ET in which small models (different in architecture) are trained on clients, and used to train a larger model at the server. Unlike in conventional ensemble learning, in FL the ensemble can be trained on clients' highly heterogeneous data. Cognizant of this property, Fed-ET uses a weighted consensus distillation scheme with diversity regularization that efficiently extracts reliable consensus from the ensemble while improving generalization by exploiting the diversity within the ensemble. We show the generalization bound for the ensemble of weighted models trained on heterogeneous datasets that supports the intuition of Fed-ET. Our experiments on image and language tasks show that Fed-ET significantly outperforms other state-of-the-art FL algorithms with fewer communicated parameters, and is also robust against high data-heterogeneity. Yae Jee Cho, Andre Manoel, Gauri Joshi, Robert Sim, Dimitrios Dimitriadis |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2017 | Effective Enzyme Deployment for Degradation of Interference Molecules in Molecular CommunicationabstractIn molecular communication, the heavy tail nature of molecular signals causes inter-symbol interference (ISI). Because of this, it is difficult to decrease symbol periods and achieve high data rate. As a probable solution for ISI mitigation, enzymes were proposed to be used since they are capable of degrading ISI molecules without deteriorating the molecular communication. While most prior work has assumed an infinite amount of enzymes deployed around the channel, from a resource perspective, it is more efficient to deploy a limited amount of enzymes at particular locations and structures. This paper considers carrying out such deployment at two structures-around the receiver (Rx) and/or the transmitter (Tx) site. For both of the deployment scenarios, channels with different system environment parameters, Tx-to-Rx distance, size of enzyme area, and symbol period, are compared with each other for analyzing an optimized system environment for ISI mitigation when a limited amount of enzymes are available. \n Yae Jee Cho, H. Birkan Yilmaz, Weisi Guo, Chan-Byoung Chae |
WCNC | 1 |