Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Allen Schmaltz

dblp:179/2249 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-5200-1935ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 62% Machine translation · 27% Information extraction and text analysis · 12%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.522017
Adapting Sequence Models for Sentence Correction · EMNLP 2017
Word Ordering Without Syntax · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
grammatical error correction
0.312017
Adapting Sequence Models for Sentence Correction · EMNLP 2017
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
phrase-based translation
0.312017
Adapting Sequence Models for Sentence Correction · EMNLP 2017
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation
0.312017
Adapting Sequence Models for Sentence Correction · EMNLP 2017
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
LSTM language model
0.212016
Word Ordering Without Syntax · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
neural language model
0.212016
Word Ordering Without Syntax · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
word ordering
0.212016
Word Ordering Without Syntax · EMNLP 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence-to-sequence model · 0.3diff modeling · 0.3character-based model · 0.3n-gram language model · 0.2beam search · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Detecting Local Insights from Global Labels: Supervised and Zero-Shot Sequence Labeling via a Convolutional Decomposition
abstract
Abstract We propose a new, more actionable view of neural network interpretability and data analysis by leveraging the remarkable matching effectiveness of representations derived from deep networks, guided by an approach for class-conditional feature detection. The decomposition of the filter-n-gram interactions of a convolutional neural network (CNN) and a linear layer over a pre-trained deep network yields a strong binary sequence labeler, with flexibility in producing predictions at—and defining loss functions for—varying label granularities, from the fully supervised sequence labeling setting to the challenging zero-shot sequence labeling setting, in which we seek token-level predictions but only have document-level labels for training. From this sequence-labeling layer we derive dense representations of the input that can then be matched to instances from training, or a support set with known labels. Such introspection with inference-time decision rules provides a means, in some settings, of making local updates to the model by altering the labels or instances in the support set without re-training the full model. Finally, we construct a particular K-nearest neighbors (K-NN) model from matched exemplar representations that approximates the original model’s predictions and is at least as effective a predictor with respect to the ground-truth labels. This additionally yields interpretable heuristics at the token level for determining when predictions are less likely to be reliable, and for screening input dissimilar to the support set. In effect, we show that we can transform the deep network into a simple weighting over exemplars and associated labels, yielding an introspectable—and modestly updatable—version of the original model.
Allen Schmaltz
Comput. Linguistics1
2017 Adapting Sequence Models for Sentence Correction
abstract
In a controlled experiment of sequence-tosequence approaches for the task of sentence correction, we find that characterbased models are generally more effective than word-based models and models that encode subword information via convolutions, and that modeling the output data as a series of diffs improves effectiveness over standard approaches.Our strongest sequence-to-sequence model improves over our strongest phrase-based statistical machine translation model, with access to the same data, by 6 M 2 (0.5 GLEU) points.Additionally, in the data environment of the standard CoNLL-2014 setup, we demonstrate that modeling (and tuning against) diffs yields similar or better M 2 scores with simpler models and/or significantly less data than previous sequence-to-sequence approaches.
Allen Schmaltz, Alexander M. Rush, Stuart M. Shieber
EMNLP1
2016 Word Ordering Without Syntax
abstract
Recent work on word ordering has argued that syntactic structure is important, or even required, for effectively recovering the order of a sentence. We find that, in fact, an n-gram language model with a simple heuristic gives strong results on this task. Furthermore, we show that a long short-term memory (LSTM) language model is even more effective at recovering order, with our basic model outperforming a state-of-the-art syntactic model by 11.5 BLEU points. Additional data and larger beams yield further gains, at the expense of training and search time.
Allen Schmaltz, Alexander M. Rush, Stuart M. Shieber
EMNLP1