Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sanna Madan
dblp:179/2470
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0001-8865-5789ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.6 | 2 | 2017 | WeSME: uncovering mutual exclusivity of cancer drivers and beyond · Bioinform. 2017 BeWith: A Between-Within Method for Module Discovery in Cancer using Integrated Analysis of Mutual Exclusivity, Co-occurrence and Functional Interactions (Extended Abstract) · RECOMB 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis
functional module identification |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | BeWith: A Between-Within Method for Module Discovery in Cancer using Integrated Analysis of Mutual Exclusivity, Co-occurrence and Functional Interactions (Extended Abstract) · RECOMB 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
mutual exclusivity analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | WeSME: uncovering mutual exclusivity of cancer drivers and beyond · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › cancer subtype analysis
cancer subtype classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | WeSME: uncovering mutual exclusivity of cancer drivers and beyond · Bioinform. 2017 |
Data mining › pattern mining › association analysis
co-occurrence analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | BeWith: A Between-Within Method for Module Discovery in Cancer using Integrated Analysis of Mutual Exclusivity, Co-occurrence and Functional Interactions (Extended Abstract) · RECOMB 2017 |
Data mining
pattern mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | BeWith: A Between-Within Method for Module Discovery in Cancer using Integrated Analysis of Mutual Exclusivity, Co-occurrence and Functional Interactions (Extended Abstract) · RECOMB 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mutual exclusivity analysis · 0.6functional interaction integration · 0.6permutation test · 0.3p-value estimation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | BeWith: A Between-Within Method for Module Discovery in Cancer using Integrated Analysis of Mutual Exclusivity, Co-occurrence and Functional Interactions (Extended Abstract)
Phuong Dao, Yoo-Ah Kim, Sanna Madan, Roded Sharan, Teresa M. Przytycka |
RECOMB | 3 |
| 2017 | WeSME: uncovering mutual exclusivity of cancer drivers and beyondabstractMotivation: Mutual exclusivity is a widely recognized property of many cancer drivers. Knowledge about these relationships can provide important insights into cancer drivers, cancer-driving pathways and cancer subtypes. It can also be used to predict new functional interactions between cancer driving genes and uncover novel cancer drivers. Currently, most of mutual exclusivity analyses are preformed focusing on a limited set of genes in part due to the computational cost required to rigorously compute P -values. Results: To reduce the computing cost and perform less restricted mutual exclusivity analysis, we developed an efficient method to estimate P -values while controlling the mutation rates of individual patients and genes similar to the permutation test. A comprehensive mutual exclusivity analysis allowed us to uncover mutually exclusive pairs, some of which may have relatively low mutation rates. These pairs often included likely cancer drivers that have been missed in previous analyses. More importantly, our results demonstrated that mutual exclusivity can also provide information that goes beyond the interactions between cancer drivers and can, for example, elucidate different mutagenic processes in different cancer groups. In particular, including frequently mutated, long genes such as TTN in our analysis allowed us to observe interesting patterns of APOBEC activity in breast cancer and identify a set of related driver genes that are highly predictive of patient survival. In addition, we utilized our mutual exclusivity analysis in support of a previously proposed model where APOBEC activity is the underlying process that causes TP53 mutations in a subset of breast cancer cases. Availability and Implementation: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Przytycka/index.cgi#wesme. Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Yoo-Ah Kim, Sanna Madan, Teresa M. Przytycka |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2017 | BeWith: A Between-Within method to discover relationships between cancer modules via integrated analysis of mutual exclusivity, co-occurrence and functional interactionsabstractThe analysis of the mutational landscape of cancer, including mutual exclusivity and co-occurrence of mutations, has been instrumental in studying the disease. We hypothesized that exploring the interplay between co-occurrence, mutual exclusivity, and functional interactions between genes will further improve our understanding of the disease and help to uncover new relations between cancer driving genes and pathways. To this end, we designed a general framework, BeWith, for identifying modules with different combinations of mutation and interaction patterns. We focused on three different settings of the BeWith schema: (i) BeME-WithFun, in which the relations between modules are enriched with mutual exclusivity, while genes within each module are functionally related; (ii) BeME-WithCo, which combines mutual exclusivity between modules with co-occurrence within modules; and (iii) BeCo-WithMEFun, which ensures co-occurrence between modules, while the within module relations combine mutual exclusivity and functional interactions. We formulated the BeWith framework using Integer Linear Programming (ILP), enabling us to find optimally scoring sets of modules. Our results demonstrate the utility of BeWith in providing novel information about mutational patterns, driver genes, and pathways. In particular, BeME-WithFun helped identify functionally coherent modules that might be relevant for cancer progression. In addition to finding previously well-known drivers, the identified modules pointed to other novel findings such as the interaction between NCOR2 and NCOA3 in breast cancer. Additionally, an application of the BeME-WithCo setting revealed that gene groups differ with respect to their vulnerability to different mutagenic processes, and helped us to uncover pairs of genes with potentially synergistic effects, including a potential synergy between mutations in TP53 and the metastasis related DCC gene. Overall, BeWith not only helped us uncover relations between potential driver genes and pathways, but also provided additional insights on patterns of the mutational landscape, going beyond cancer driving mutations. Implementation is available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Przytycka/software/bewith.html. Phuong Dao, Yoo-Ah Kim, Damian Wójtowicz, Sanna Madan, Roded Sharan, Teresa M. Przytycka |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 4 |