Osvaldo Guzmán González

dblp:179/4526 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
4as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 8 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Construction schemes: Transferring structures from ω to ω1
Jorge Antonio Cruz Chapital, Osvaldo Guzmán González, Stevo Todorcevic
Ann. Pure Appl. Log.2
2022 More on FRéChet-Urysohn ideals
abstract
Abstract We study the Rudin–Keisler pre-order on Fréchet–Urysohn ideals on $\omega $ . We solve three open questions posed by S. García-Ferreira and J. E. Rivera-Gómez in the articles [5] and [6] by establishing the following results: • For every AD family $\mathcal {A},$ there is an AD family $\mathcal {B}$ such that $\mathcal {A}^{\perp } <_{{\textsf {RK}}}\mathcal {B}^{\perp }.$ • If $\mathcal {A}$ is a nowhere MAD family of size $\mathfrak {c}$ then there is a nowhere MAD family $\mathcal {B}$ such that $\mathcal {I}\left (\mathcal {A}\right ) $ and $\mathcal {I}\left ( \mathcal {B}\right ) $ are Rudin–Keisler incomparable. • There is a family $\left \{ \mathcal {B}_{\alpha }\mid \alpha \in \mathfrak {c}\right \} $ of nowhere MAD families such that if $\alpha \neq \beta $ , then $\mathcal {I}\left ( \mathcal {B}_{\alpha }\right ) $ and $\mathcal {I}\left ( \mathcal {B}_{\beta }\right ) $ are Rudin–Keisler incomparable. Here $\mathcal {I}(\mathcal {A})$ denotes the ideal generated by an AD family $\mathcal {A}$ . In the context of hyperspaces with the Vietoris topology, for a Fréchet–Urysohn-filter $\mathcal {F}$ we let $\mathcal {S}_{c}\left ( \mathcal {\xi }\left ( \mathcal {F}\right ) \right ) $ be the hyperspace of nontrivial convergent sequences of the space consisting of $\omega $ as discrete subset and only one accumulation point $\mathcal {F}$ whose neighborhoods are the elements of $\mathcal {F}$ together with the singleton $\{\mathcal {F}\}$ . For a FU-filter $\mathcal {F}$ we show that the following are equivalent: • $\mathcal {F}$ is a FUF-filter. • $\mathcal {S}_{c}\left ( \mathcal {\xi }\left ( \mathcal {F} \right ) \right ) $ is Baire.
Salvador García Ferreira, Osvaldo Guzmán González
J. Symb. Log.2
2021 Indestructibility of ideals and MAD families
David Chodounský, Osvaldo Guzmán González
Ann. Pure Appl. Log.2
2021 Preservation theorems for Namba forcing
Osvaldo Guzmán González, Michael Hrusák, Jindrich Zapletal
Ann. Pure Appl. Log.1
2021 Ideal Independent families and the Ultrafilter number
abstract
Abstract We say that $\mathcal {I}$ is an ideal independent family if no element of ${\mathcal {I}}$ is a subset mod finite of a union of finitely many other elements of ${\mathcal {I}}.$ We will show that the minimum size of a maximal ideal independent family is consistently bigger than both $\mathfrak {d}$ and $\mathfrak {u},$ this answers a question of Donald Monk.
Jonathan Cancino, Osvaldo Guzmán González, Arnold W. Miller
J. Symb. Log.2
2020 Restricted MAD families
abstract
Abstract Let ${\cal I}$ be an ideal on ω. By cov ${}_{}^{\rm{*}}({\cal I})$ we denote the least size of a family ${\cal B} \subseteq {\cal I}$ such that for every infinite $X \in {\cal I}$ there is $B \in {\cal B}$ for which $B\mathop \cap \nolimits X$ is infinite. We say that an AD family ${\cal A} \subseteq {\cal I}$ is a MAD family restricted to ${\cal I}$ if for every infinite $X \in {\cal I}$ there is $A \in {\cal A}$ such that $|X\mathop \cap \nolimits A| = \omega$ . Let a $\left( {\cal I} \right)$ be the least size of an infinite MAD family restricted to ${\cal I}$ . We prove that If $max$ {a,cov ${}_{}^{\rm{*}}({\cal I})\}$ then a $\left( {\cal I} \right) = {\omega _1}$ , and consequently, if ${\cal I}$ is tall and $\le {\omega _2}$ then a $\left( {\cal I} \right) = max$ {a,cov ${}_{}^{\rm{*}}({\cal I})\}$ . We use these results to prove that if c $\le {\omega _2}$ then o $= \overline o$ and that as $= max$ {a,non $({\cal M})\}$ . We also analyze the problem whether it is consistent with the negation of CH that every AD family of size ω1 can be extended to a MAD family of size ω1.
Osvaldo Guzmán González, Michael Hrusák, Osvaldo Téllez
J. Symb. Log.1
2017 The onto Mapping of Sierpinski and Nonmeager Sets
abstract
Abstract The principle (*) of Sierpinski is the assertion that there is a family of functions $\left\{ {{\varphi _n}:{\omega _1} \to {\omega _1}|n \in \omega } \right\}$ such that for every $I \in {[{\omega _1}]^{{\omega _1}}}$ there is n ε ω such that ${\varphi _n}[I] = {\omega _1}$ . We prove that this principle holds if there is a nonmeager set of size ω1 answering question of Arnold W. Miller. Combining our result with a theorem of Miller it then follows that (*) is equivalent to $non\left( {\cal M} \right) = {\omega _1}$ . Miller also proved that the principle of Sierpinki is equivalent to the existence of a weak version of a Luzin set, we will construct a model where all of these sets are meager yet $non\left( {\cal M} \right) = {\omega _1}$ .
Osvaldo Guzmán González
J. Symb. Log.1
2017 Generic existence of MAD families
abstract
Abstract In this note we study generic existence of maximal almost disjoint (MAD) families. Among other results we prove that Cohen-indestructible families exist generically if and only if b = c. We obtain analogous results for other combinatorial properties of MAD families, including Sacks-indestructibility and being +-Ramsey.
Osvaldo Guzmán González, Michael Hrusák, Carlos Azarel Martínez-Ranero, Ulises Ariet Ramos-García
J. Symb. Log.1