EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joanne Locascio
dblp:179/4594
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Usability and user experience research · 50% User interface design and tools · 50% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Usability and user experience research › usability evaluation
usability testing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Utilizing Employees as Usability Participants: Exploring When and When Not to Leverage Your Coworkers · CHI 2016 |
Empirical software engineering › software engineering practice
industrial practice |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Utilizing Employees as Usability Participants: Exploring When and When Not to Leverage Your Coworkers · CHI 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
usability study · 0.5SUS · 0.5SEQ · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Utilizing Employees as Usability Participants: Exploring When and When Not to Leverage Your CoworkersabstractUsability testing is an everyday practice for usability professionals in corporations. But, as in all experimental situations, who you study can be as important as what you study. In this Note we explore a common practice in the corporation: experimenting on the company's employees. While fellow employees can be convenient and avoid issues such as confidentiality, we use two usability studies of mobile and web applications to show that employees spend less time-on-task on competitor websites than non-employees. Non-employees reliably rate competitor websites and apps higher than employees on both usability (on the 10-question SUS scale) and ease of use (on the 1-question SEQ scale). We conclude with recommendations for best practices for usability testing in the corporation. Joanne Locascio, Rushil Khurana, Joseph Kaye |
CHI | 1 |