Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Joanne Locascio

dblp:179/4594 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 50% User interface design and tools · 50%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usability and user experience research › usability evaluation
usability testing
0.212016
Utilizing Employees as Usability Participants: Exploring When and When Not to Leverage Your Coworkers · CHI 2016
Empirical software engineering › software engineering practice
industrial practice
0.112016
Utilizing Employees as Usability Participants: Exploring When and When Not to Leverage Your Coworkers · CHI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

usability study · 0.5SUS · 0.5SEQ · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Utilizing Employees as Usability Participants: Exploring When and When Not to Leverage Your Coworkers
abstract
Usability testing is an everyday practice for usability professionals in corporations. But, as in all experimental situations, who you study can be as important as what you study. In this Note we explore a common practice in the corporation: experimenting on the company's employees. While fellow employees can be convenient and avoid issues such as confidentiality, we use two usability studies of mobile and web applications to show that employees spend less time-on-task on competitor websites than non-employees. Non-employees reliably rate competitor websites and apps higher than employees on both usability (on the 10-question SUS scale) and ease of use (on the 1-question SEQ scale). We conclude with recommendations for best practices for usability testing in the corporation.
Joanne Locascio, Rushil Khurana, Joseph Kaye
CHI1