Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sugarragchaa Khurelbaatar
dblp:179/4751
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Haptics and multimodal interaction · 44% Interaction techniques and input · 44% User interface design and tools · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Haptics and multimodal interaction › haptic feedback
tactile feedback |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Tactile Presentation to the Back of a Smartphone with Simultaneous Screen Operation · CHI 2016 |
Interaction techniques and input › touch interaction
touchscreen interaction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Tactile Presentation to the Back of a Smartphone with Simultaneous Screen Operation · CHI 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Tactile Presentation to the Back of a Smartphone with Simultaneous Screen OperationabstractThe most common method of presenting tactile stimuli to touch screens has been to directly attach a tactile display to the screens. This requires a transparent tactile display so that the view is not obstructed. In contrast, transparency is not required if the tactile stimuli are presented on the back of the device. However, stimulating the entire palm is not appropriate because touch screens are typically used by only one finger. To overcome these limitations, we propose a new method in which tactile feedback is delivered to a single finger on the back of a touch screen. We used an electro-tactile display because it is small and dense. The tactile display presents touch stimuli as mirror images of the shapes on the touch screen. By comparing cases in which the device was operated by one or two hands, we found that shape discrimination is possible using this method. Sugarragchaa Khurelbaatar, Yuriko Nakai, Ryuta Okazaki, Vibol Yem, Hiroyuki Kajimoto |
CHI | 1 |