Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Saif Muhammad Imran

dblp:179/6588 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
depth completion
0.922021
Depth Completion With Twin Surface Extrapolation at Occlusion Boundaries · CVPR 2021
Depth Coefficients for Depth Completion · CVPR 2019
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation
0.922021
Depth Completion With Twin Surface Extrapolation at Occlusion Boundaries · CVPR 2021
Depth Coefficients for Depth Completion · CVPR 2019
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth image analysis
depth map representation
0.412019
Depth Coefficients for Depth Completion · CVPR 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

twin-surface extrapolation · 0.5multi-hypothesis representation · 0.5asymmetric loss function · 0.5depth coefficients · 0.4cross-entropy loss · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Depth Completion With Twin Surface Extrapolation at Occlusion Boundaries
abstract
Depth completion starts from a sparse set of known depth values and estimates the unknown depths for the remaining image pixels. Most methods model this as depth interpolation and erroneously interpolate depth pixels into the empty space between spatially distinct objects, resulting in depth-smearing across occlusion boundaries. Here we propose a multi-hypothesis depth representation that explicitly models both foreground and background depths in the difficult occlusion-boundary regions. Our method can be thought of as performing twin-surface extrapolation, rather than interpolation, in these regions. Next our method fuses these extrapolated surfaces into a single depth image leveraging the image data. Key to our method is the use of an asymmetric loss function that operates on a novel twin-surface representation. This enables us to train a network to simultaneously do surface extrapolation and surface fusion. We characterize our loss function and compare with other common losses. Finally, we validate our method on three different datasets; KITTI, an outdoor real-world dataset, NYU2, indoor real-world depth dataset and Virtual KITTI, a photo-realistic synthetic dataset with dense groundtruth, and demonstrate improvement over the state of the art.
Saif Muhammad Imran, Xiaoming Liu 0002, Daniel D. Morris
CVPR1
2019 Depth Coefficients for Depth Completion
abstract
Depth completion involves estimating a dense depth image from sparse depth measurements, often guided by a color image. While linear upsampling is straight forward, it results in depth pixels being interpolated in empty space across discontinuities between objects. Current methods use deep networks to maintain gaps between objects. Nevertheless depth smearing remains a challenge. We propose a new representation for depth called Depth Coefficients (DC) to address this problem. It enables convolutions to more easily avoid inter-object depth mixing. We also show that the standard Mean Squared Error (MSE) loss function can promote depth mixing, and so we propose instead to use cross-entropy loss for DC. Both quantitative and qualitative evaluation are conducted on benchmarks, and we show that switching out sparse depth input and MSE loss functions with our DC representation and loss is a simple way to improve performance, reduce pixel depth mixing and can improve object detection.
Saif Muhammad Imran, Xiaoming Liu 0002, Daniel D. Morris
CVPR1
2016 Multi-modality imagery database for plant phenotyping
Jeffrey A. Cruz, Xi Yin 0001, Xiaoming Liu 0002, Saif Muhammad Imran, Daniel D. Morris, David M. Kramer 0001, Jin Chen 0004
Mach. Vis. Appl.4
2016 Differential components of discriminative 2D Gaussian-Hermite moments for recognition of facial expressions
Saif Muhammad Imran, S. M. Mahbubur Rahman, Dimitrios Hatzinakos
Pattern Recognit.1