Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew LeClair

dblp:179/8428 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-2779-8000ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
modularity
0.712023
A Review on Ontology Modularization Techniques - A Multi-Dimensional Perspective · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
ontology
0.712023
A Review on Ontology Modularization Techniques - A Multi-Dimensional Perspective · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology
ontology modularity
0.712023
A Review on Ontology Modularization Techniques - A Multi-Dimensional Perspective · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

systematic literature review · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 A Review on Ontology Modularization Techniques - A Multi-Dimensional Perspective
abstract
In the past two decades, the use of ontologies has grown accompanied by a diversity in ontological representations and applications to more comprehensive domains. Knowledge engineers have found it expeditious to break down large (monolithic) ontologies to work with smaller fragments. Ontology modularization is the process of extracting a fragment, or "module", from an ontology, based on predefined requirements. Due to both the diversity in ontological representations and motivations for modularizing, the body of research on ontology modularization techniques has become extremely large and may be intimidating to the novice ontology researcher. The objective of the paper is to present a comprehensive, albeit high-level, review of ontology modularization techniques. A systematic literature review covering January 1st 2000 to July 31st 2020 was performed to find and classify papers on ontology modularization techniques. The techniques exhibiting certain properties with respect to several features were assessed, and the modularization techniques were classified with a multi-dimensional perspective. The classifications are intended to guide one to a suitable modularization process in accordance with the requirements. The limitations of ontology modularization techniques are highlighted in the conclusion, and characteristics of a desirable framework for an ontology representation that would be best-suited for modularization are presented.
Andrew LeClair, Alicia Marinache, Haya El Ghalayini, Wendy MacCaull, Ridha Khédri
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2022 Architecture for ontology-supported multi-context reasoning systems
Andrew LeClair, Jason Jaskolka, Wendy MacCaull, Ridha Khédri
Data Knowl. Eng.1
2019 Toward Measuring Knowledge Loss due to Ontology Modularization
abstract
This paper formalizes the graphical modularization technique, View Traversal, for an ontology-based system represented using the Domain Information System (DIS). Our work is motivated by the need for autonomous agents, within an ontology-based system, to automatically create their own views of the ontology to address the problems of ontology evolution and data integration found in an enterprise setting. Through DIS, we explore specific ontologies that give Cartesian perspectives of the domain, which allows modularization to be a means for agents to extract views of specific combinations of data. The theory of ideals from Boolean algebra is used to formalize a module. Then, with the use of homomorphisms, the quantity of knowledge within the module can be measured. More specifically, through the first isomorphism theorem, we establish that the loss of information is quantified by the kernel of the homomorphism. This constitutes a foundational step towards theories related to reasoning on partial domain knowledge, and is important for applications where an agent needs to quickly extract a view that contains a specific set of knowledge.
Andrew LeClair, Ridha Khédri, Alicia Marinache
KEOD1
2019 Formalizing Graphical Modularization Approaches for Ontologies and the Knowledge Loss
Andrew LeClair, Ridha Khédri, Alicia Marinache
IC3K1