Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eitan Federovsky
dblp:18/1009
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 77% Performance modeling and evaluation · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
branch prediction |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Branch Prediction Based on Universal Data Compression Algorithms · ISCA 1998 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking › benchmark suite
SPEC benchmarks |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Branch Prediction Based on Universal Data Compression Algorithms · ISCA 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prediction by partial matching · 0.0context tree weighting · 0.0adaptive algorithm · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | Branch Prediction Based on Universal Data Compression AlgorithmsabstractData compression and prediction are closely related. Thus prediction methods based on data compression algorithms have been suggested for the branch prediction problem. In this work we consider two universal compression algorithms: prediction by partial matching (PPM), and a recently developed method, context tree weighting (CTW). We describe the prediction algorithms induced by these methods. We also suggest adaptive algorithms variations of the basic methods that attempt to fit limited memory constraints and to match the non-stationary nature of the branch sequence. Furthermore, we show how to incorporate address information and to combine other relevant data. Finally, we present simulation results for selected programs from the SPECint95, SYSmark/32, SYSmark/NT, and transactional processing benchmarks. Our results are most promising in programs with difficult to predict branch behavior. Eitan Federovsky, Meir Feder, Shlomo Weiss |
ISCA | 1 |