Taiwanese Hokkien is declining in use and status due to a language shift towards Mandarin in Taiwan. This is partly why it is a low resource language in NLP and speech research today. To ensure that the state of the art in speech processing does not leave Taiwanese Hokkien behind, we contribute a 1.5-hour dataset of Taiwanese Hokkien to MLSUPERB’s hidden set. Evaluating ML-SUPERB’s suite of self-supervised learning (SSL) speech representations on our dataset, we find that model size does not consistently determine performance. In fact, certain smaller models outperform larger ones. Furthermore, linguistic alignment between pretraining data and the target language plays a crucial role.

The trend for multicore processors is towards increasing numbers of cores, with 100s of cores--i.e. large-scale chip multiprocessors (LCMPs)--possible in the future. The key to realizing the potential of LCMPs is the cache hierarchy, so studying how memory performance will scale is crucial. Reuse distance (RD) analysis can help architects do this. In particular, recent work has developed concurrent reuse distance (CRD) and private reuse distance (PRD) profiles to enable analysis of shared and private caches. Also, techniques have been developed to predict profiles across problem size and core count, enabling the analysis of configurations that are too large to simulate.

Reuse Distance (RD) analysis is a powerful memory analysis tool that can potentially help architects study multicore processor scaling. One key obstacle, however, is that multicore RD analysis requires measuring Concurrent Reuse Distance (CRD) and Private-LRU-stack Reuse Distance (PRD) profiles across thread-interleaved memory reference streams. Sensitivity to memory interleaving makes CRD and PRD profiles architecture dependent, preventing them from analyzing different processor configurations. For loop-based parallel programs, CRD and PRD profiles shift coherently across RD values with core count scaling because interleaving threads are symmetric. Simple techniques can predict such shifting, making the analysis of numerous multicore configurations from a small set of CRD and PRD profiles feasible. Given the ubiquity of parallel loops, such techniques will be extremely valuable for studying future large multicore designs. This article investigates using RD analysis to efficiently analyze multicore cache performance for loop-based parallel programs, making several contributions. First, we provide an in-depth analysis on how CRD and PRD profiles change with core count scaling. Second, we develop techniques to predict CRD and PRD profile scaling, in particular employing reference groups [Zhong et al. 2003] to predict coherent shift, demonstrating 90% or greater prediction accuracy. Third, our CRD and PRD profile analyses define two application parameters with architectural implications: C core is the minimum shared cache capacity that “contains” locality degradation due to core count scaling, and C share is the capacity at which shared caches begin to provide a cache-miss reduction compared to private caches. And fourth, we apply CRD and PRD profiles to analyze multicore cache performance. When combined with existing problem scaling prediction, our techniques can predict shared LLC MPKI (private L2 cache MPKI) to within 10.7% (13.9%) of simulation across 1,728 (1,440) configurations using only 36 measured CRD (PRD) profiles.

Reuse distance (RD) analysis is a powerful memory analysis tool that can potentially help architects study multicore processor scaling. One key obstacle though is multicore RD analysis requires measuring concurrent reuse distance (CRD) profiles across thread-interleaved memory reference streams. Sensitivity to memory interleaving makes CRD profiles architecture dependent, preventing them from analyzing different processor configurations. For loop-based parallel programs, CRD profiles shift coherently to larger CRD values with core count scaling because interleaving threads are symmetric. Simple techniques can predict such shifting, making the analysis of numerous multicore configurations from a small set of CRD profiles feasible. Given the ubiquity and scalability of loop-level parallelism, such techniques will be extremely valuable for studying future large multicore designs. This paper investigates using RD analysis to efficiently analyze multicore cache performance for loop-based parallel programs, making several contributions. First, we provide in depth analysis on how CRD profiles change with core count scaling. Second, we develop techniques to predict CRD profile scaling, in particular employing reference groups to predict coherent shift, and evaluate prediction accuracy. Third, we show core count scaling only degrades performance for last level caches (LLCs) below 16MB for our benchmarks and problem sizes, increasing to 64 - 128MB if problem size scales by 64x. Finally, we apply CRD profiles to analyze multicore cache performance. When combined with existing problem scaling prediction, our techniques can predict LLC MPKI to within 11.1% of simulation across 1,728 configurations using only 36 measured CRD profiles.