Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shipei Zhang
dblp:18/1367
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 61% Computational complexity · 30% Logic in computer science · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | On the Parallel Complexity of Model Checking in the Modal Mu-Calculus · LICS 1994 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking › temporal logic model checking
mu-calculus model checking |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | On the Parallel Complexity of Model Checking in the Modal Mu-Calculus · LICS 1994 |
Computational complexity
parallel complexity |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | On the Parallel Complexity of Model Checking in the Modal Mu-Calculus · LICS 1994 |
Logic in computer science › domain theory › fixed points
fixed-point operators |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | On the Parallel Complexity of Model Checking in the Modal Mu-Calculus · LICS 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
datalog reduction · 0.0circuit value problem · 0.0NC algorithms · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | On the Parallel Complexity of Model Checking in the Modal Mu-CalculusabstractThe modal mu-calculus is an expressive logic that can be used to specify safety and liveness properties of concurrent systems represented as labeled transition systems (LTSs). We show that Model Checking in the Modal Mu-Calculus (MCMMC)-the problem of checking whether an LTS is a model of a formula of the propositional modal mu-calculus-is P-hard even for a very restrictive version of the problem involving the alternation-free fragment. In particular, MCMMC is P-hard even if the formula is fixed and alternation-free, and the LTS is deterministic, acyclic, and has fan-in and fan-out bounded by 2. The reduction used is from a restricted version of the circuit value problem known as Synchronous Alternating Monotone Fanout 2 Circuit Value Problem. Specifically, we exhibit NC-algorithms for two potentially useful versions of the problem, both of which involve alternation-free formulas containing a constant number of fixed point operators: 1) the LTS is a finite tree with bounded fan-out; and 2) the formula is A-free and the LTS is deterministic and over an action alphabet of bounded size. In the course of deriving our algorithm for 2), we give a parallel constant-time reduction from the alternation-free modal mu-calculus to Datalog. We also provide a polynomial-time reduction in the other direction thereby establishing an interesting link between the two formalisms.> Shipei Zhang, Oleg Sokolsky, Scott A. Smolka |
LICS | 1 |
| 1992 | Towards efficient parallelization of equivalence checking algorithms
Shipei Zhang, Scott A. Smolka |
FORTE | 1 |