Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michelle Gantt
dblp:18/1790
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 67% Software maintenance and evolution · 33% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Gardeners and Gurus: Patterns of Cooperation Among CAD Users · CHI 1992 |
Empirical software engineering
developer studies |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Gardeners and Gurus: Patterns of Cooperation Among CAD Users · CHI 1992 |
Empirical software engineering
end-user programming |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Gardeners and Gurus: Patterns of Cooperation Among CAD Users · CHI 1992 |
Software maintenance and evolution › software evolution › software adaptation
software customization |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Gardeners and Gurus: Patterns of Cooperation Among CAD Users · CHI 1992 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
interviews · 0.0field study · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1992 | Gardeners and Gurus: Patterns of Cooperation Among CAD UsersabstractWe studied CAD system users to find out how they use the sophisticated customization and extension facilities offered by many CAD products. We found that users of varying levels of expertise collaborate to customize their CAD environments and to create programmatic extensions to their applications. Within a group of users, there is at least one local expert who provides support for other users. We call this person a local developer. The local developer is a fellow domain expert, not a professional programmer, outside technical consultant or MIS staff member. We found that in some CAD environments the support role has been formalized so that local developers are given official recognition, and time and resources to pursue local developer activities. In general, this formalization of the local developer role appears successful. We discuss the implications of our findings for work practices and for software design. Michelle Gantt, Bonnie A. Nardi |
CHI | 1 |