Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

C. R. Reddy

dblp:18/2957 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1981
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Logic in computer science · 62% Automated reasoning and model checking · 38%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking
theorem proving
0.011981
Deleting Repeated Goals in the Problem Reduction Format · J. ACM 1981
Logic in computer science › formal arithmetic
presburger arithmetic
0.011978
Presburger Arithmetic with Bounded Quantifier Alternation · STOC 1978
Logic in computer science › first-order logic
quantifier alternation
0.011978
Presburger Arithmetic with Bounded Quantifier Alternation · STOC 1978
Logic in computer science
proof theory
0.011981
Deleting Repeated Goals in the Problem Reduction Format · J. ACM 1981
Program verification
decision procedure
0.011978
Presburger Arithmetic with Bounded Quantifier Alternation · STOC 1978

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cooper-presburger decision procedure · 0.0completeness proof · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1981 Deleting Repeated Goals in the Problem Reduction Format
abstract
Although the classical problem reducUon format for orgamzmg automauc proof search is incomplete, a complete extension of the format is known ElimmaUon of tdentlcal descendent subgoals is a well-known deletion rule for the classical format but is not obviously vahd m the extended format.Because of ~ts mtumve appeal and ease of apphcatlon, one would wish to know that the rule ~s safe to use m the extended format It ts shown here that the deleuon rule is indeed safe The result appears to be decidedly nontnvml
Donald W. Loveland, C. R. Reddy
J. ACM2
1978 Presburger Arithmetic with Bounded Quantifier Alternation
abstract
This paper concerns both the complexity aspects of PA and the pragmatics of improving algorithms for dealing with restricted subcases of PA for uses such as program verification. We improve the Cooper-Presburger decision procedure and show that the improved version permits us to obtain time and space upper bounds for PA classes restricted to a bounded number of alternations of quantifiers. The improvement is one exponent less than the upper bounds for the decision problem for full PA. The pragmatists not interested in complexity bounds can read the results as substantiation of the intuitive feeling that the improvement to the Cooper-Presburger algorithm is a real, rather than ineffectual, improvement. (It can be easily shown that the bounds obtained here are not achievable using the Cooper-Presburger procedure).
C. R. Reddy, Donald W. Loveland
STOC1