Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Margus Lukk
dblp:18/3229
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-0701-5358ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome editing
CRISPR guide RNA design |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Crisflash: open-source software to generate CRISPR guide RNAs against genomes annotated with individual variation · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Crisflash: open-source software to generate CRISPR guide RNAs against genomes annotated with individual variation · Bioinform. 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › data integration
biological data integration |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Importing ArrayExpress datasets into R/Bioconductor · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
gene expression meta-analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | MageComet - web application for harmonizing existing large-scale experiment descriptions · Bioinform. 2012 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
data mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | MAGETabulator, a suite of tools to support the microarray data format MAGE-TAB · Bioinform. 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variant integration · 0.4sequence indexing · 0.4ontology-based annotation · 0.1data validation · 0.1data mining · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Crisflash: open-source software to generate CRISPR guide RNAs against genomes annotated with individual variationabstractSUMMARY: CRISPR/Cas9 system requires short guide RNAs (sgRNAs) to direct genome modification. Most currently available tools for sgRNA design operate only with standard reference genomes, and are best suited for small-scale projects. To address these limitations, we developed Crisflash, a software tool for fast sgRNA design and potential off-target discovery, built for performance and flexibility. Crisflash can rapidly design CRISPR guides against any sequenced genome or genome sequences, and can optimize guide accuracy by incorporating user-supplied variant data. Crisflash is over an order of magnitude faster than comparable tools, even using a single CPU core, and efficiently and robustly scores the potential off-targeting of all possible candidate CRISPR guide oligonucleotides. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/crisflash. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Adrien L. S. Jacquin, Duncan T. Odom, Margus Lukk |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2012 | MageComet - web application for harmonizing existing large-scale experiment descriptionsabstractAbstract Motivation: Meta-analysis of large gene expression datasets obtained from public repositories requires consistently annotated data. Curation of such experiments, however, is an expert activity which involves repetitive manipulation of text. Existing tools for automated curation are few, which bottleneck the analysis pipeline. Results: We present MageComet, a web application for biologists and annotators that facilitates the re-annotation of gene expression experiments in MAGE-TAB format. It incorporates data mining, automatic annotation, use of ontologies and data validation to improve the consistency and quality of experimental meta-data from the ArrayExpress Repository. Availability and implementation: Source and tutorials for MageComet are openly available at goo.gl/8LQPR under the GNU GPL v3 licenses. An implementation can be found at goo.gl/IdCuA Contact: [email protected] or [email protected] Vincent Xue, Tony Burdett, Margus Lukk, Julie Taylor, Alvis Brazma, Helen E. Parkinson |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2011 | Assessments of Affymetrix GeneChip Microarray Quality for Laboratories and Single SamplesabstractBACKGROUND: Microarray technology has become a widely used tool in the biological sciences. Over the past decade, the number of users has grown exponentially, and with the number of applications and secondary data analyses rapidly increasing, we expect this rate to continue. Various initiatives such as the External RNA Control Consortium (ERCC) and the MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project have explored ways to provide standards for the technology. For microarrays to become generally accepted as a reliable technology, statistical methods for assessing quality will be an indispensable component; however, there remains a lack of consensus in both defining and measuring microarray quality. RESULTS: We begin by providing a precise definition of microarray quality and reviewing existing Affymetrix GeneChip quality metrics in light of this definition. We show that the best-performing metrics require multiple arrays to be assessed simultaneously. While such multi-array quality metrics are adequate for bench science, as microarrays begin to be used in clinical settings, single-array quality metrics will be indispensable. To this end, we define a single-array version of one of the best multi-array quality metrics and show that this metric performs as well as the best multi-array metrics. We then use this new quality metric to assess the quality of microarry data available via the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) using more than 22,000 Affymetrix HGU133a and HGU133plus2 arrays from 809 studies. CONCLUSIONS: We find that approximately 10 percent of these publicly available arrays are of poor quality. Moreover, the quality of microarray measurements varies greatly from hybridization to hybridization, study to study, and lab to lab, with some experiments producing unusable data. Many of the concepts described here are applicable to other high-throughput technologies. Matthew N. McCall, Peter N. Murakami, Margus Lukk, Wolfgang Huber, Rafael A. Irizarry |
BMC Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2009 | Importing ArrayExpress datasets into R/BioconductorabstractAbstract Summary:ArrayExpress is one of the largest public repositories of microarray datasets. R/Bioconductor provides a comprehensive suite of microarray analysis and integrative bioinformatics software. However, easy ways for importing datasets from ArrayExpress into R/Bioconductor have been lacking. Here, we present such a tool that is suitable for both interactive and automated use. Availability: The ArrayExpress package is available from the Bioconductor project at http://www.bioconductor.org. A users guide and examples are provided with the package. Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available Bioinformatics online. Audrey Kauffmann, Tim F. Rayner, Helen E. Parkinson, Misha Kapushesky, Margus Lukk, Alvis Brazma, Wolfgang Huber |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2009 | MAGETabulator, a suite of tools to support the microarray data format MAGE-TABabstractAbstract Summary: The MAGE-TAB format for microarray data representation and exchange has been proposed by the microarray community to replace the more complex MAGE-ML format. We present a suite of tools to support MAGE-TAB generation and validation, conversion between existing formats for data exchange, visualization of the experiment designs encoded by MAGE-TAB documents and the mining of such documents for semantic content. Availability: Software is available from http://tab2mage.sourceforge.net/ Contact: [email protected] Tim F. Rayner, Faisal Ibne Rezwan, Margus Lukk, Xiangqun Zheng Bradley, Anna Farne, Ele Holloway, James Malone, Eleanor Williams, Helen E. Parkinson |
Bioinform. | 3 |