Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jim Radford

dblp:18/348 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
hybrid systems
0.011999
An Investigation into Non-Smooth Locomotion · ICRA 1999
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
controllability
0.011999
An Investigation into Non-Smooth Locomotion · ICRA 1999
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot dynamics
lagrangian dynamics
0.011999
An Investigation into Non-Smooth Locomotion · ICRA 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

series representation · 0.0lagrangian mechanics · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Visual Inertial Odometry At the Edge: A Hardware-Software Co-design Approach for Ultra-low Latency and Power
abstract
Visual Inertial Odometry (VIO) is used for estimating pose and trajectory of a system and is a foundational requirement in many emerging applications like AR/VR, autonomous navigation in cars, drones and robots. In this paper, we analyze key compute bottlenecks in VIO and present a highly optimized VIO accelerator based on a hardware-software codesign approach. We detail a set of novel micro-architectural techniques that optimize compute, data movement, bandwidth and dynamic power to make it possible to deliver high quality of VIO at ultra-low latency and power required for budget constrained edge devices. By offloading the computation of the critical linear algebra algorithms from the CPU, the accelerator enables high sample rate IMU usage in VIO processing while acceleration of image processing pipe increases precision, robustness and reduces IMU induced drift in final pose estimate. The proposed accelerator requires a small silicon footprint (1.3 mm2in a 28nm process at 600 MHz), utilizes a modest on-chip shared SRAM (560KB) and achieves 10x speedup over a software-only implementation in terms of image sample-based pose update latency while consuming just 2.2 mW power. In a FPGA implementation, using the EuRoC VIO dataset (VGA 30fps images and 100Hz IMU) the accelerator design achieves pose estimation accuracy (loop closure error) comparable to a software based VIO implementation.
Dipan Mandal, Srivatsava Jandhyala, Om Ji Omer, Gurpreet S. Kalsi, Biji George, Gopi Neela, Santhosh Kumar Rethinagiri, Sreenivas Subramoney, Lance Hacking, Jim Radford, Eagle Jones, Belliappa Kuttanna, Hong Wang 0003
DATE10
1999 An Investigation into Non-Smooth Locomotion
abstract
We analyze a class of mechanisms that locomote by switching between constraints. Because of the hybrid nature of such systems, most of the existing analysis tools, developed primarily for smooth systems, can not be directly applied. Our aim is to exploit the special structure provided by Lagrangian mechanics to study the controllability of this class of mechanisms. We base the analysis on a series representation of the evolution of the system. Our main result is a description of trajectories involving switches between constraints at nonzero velocity (impacts) in the presence of large inertial forces (drift). The analysis provides a basis for local motion planning. The results are applied to an example of a two-link planar mechanism that can locomote by clamping one of the links.
Milos Zefran, Francesco Bullo, Jim Radford
ICRA3