Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Lawrence Feigen

dblp:18/3616 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Compilers and program optimization · 50% Program analysis · 50%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program analysis
data flow analysis		 0.011994
The Revival Transformation · POPL 1994
Compilers and program optimization
dead code elimination		 0.011994
The Revival Transformation · POPL 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data flow analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 The Revival Transformation
abstract
The notion that a definition of a variable is dead is used by optimizing compilers to delete code whose execution is useless. We extend the notion of deadness to that of partial deadness, and define a transformation, the revival transformation, which eliminates useless executions of a (partially dead) definition by tightening its execution conditions without changing the set of uses which it reaches or the conditions under which it reaches each of them.
Lawrence Feigen, David Klappholz, Robert Casazza, Xing Xue
 POPL1