Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Oliver Thomas 0002
dblp:18/3788-2
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0001-8162-9633ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 92% Generative modeling · 8% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Null-Sampling for Interpretable and Fair Representations · ECCV (26) 2020 Discovering Fair Representations in the Data Domain · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fair representation learning |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Null-Sampling for Interpretable and Fair Representations · ECCV (26) 2020 Discovering Fair Representations in the Data Domain · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Null-Sampling for Interpretable and Fair Representations · ECCV (26) 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explainable AI
interpretable representation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Null-Sampling for Interpretable and Fair Representations · ECCV (26) 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › controllable generation
attribute manipulation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Discovering Fair Representations in the Data Domain · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
image-to-image translation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Discovering Fair Representations in the Data Domain · CVPR 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
null-sampling · 0.4residual statistics · 0.4data-to-data translation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Null-Sampling for Interpretable and Fair Representations
Thomas Kehrenberg, Myles Bartlett, Oliver Thomas 0002, Novi Quadrianto |
ECCV (26) | 3 |
| 2019 | Discovering Fair Representations in the Data DomainabstractInterpretability and fairness are critical in computer vision and machine learning applications, in particular when dealing with human outcomes, e.g. inviting or not inviting for a job interview based on application materials that may include photographs. One promising direction to achieve fairness is by learning data representations that remove the semantics of protected characteristics, and are therefore able to mitigate unfair outcomes. All available models however learn latent embeddings which comes at the cost of being uninterpretable. We propose to cast this problem as data-to-data translation, i.e. learning a mapping from an input domain to a fair target domain, where a fairness definition is being enforced. Here the data domain can be images, or any tabular data representation. This task would be straightforward if we had fair target data available, but this is not the case. To overcome this, we learn a highly unconstrained mapping by exploiting statistics of residuals -- the difference between input data and its translated version -- and the protected characteristics. When applied to the CelebA dataset of face images with gender attribute as the protected characteristic, our model enforces equality of opportunity by adjusting the eyes and lips regions. Intriguingly, on the same dataset we arrive at similar conclusions when using semantic attribute representations of images for translation. On face images of the recent DiF dataset, with the same gender attribute, our method adjusts nose regions. In the Adult income dataset, also with protected gender attribute, our model achieves equality of opportunity by, among others, obfuscating the wife and husband relationship. Analyzing those systematic changes will allow us to scrutinize the interplay of fairness criterion, chosen protected characteristics, and prediction performance. Novi Quadrianto, Viktoriia Sharmanska, Oliver Thomas 0002 |
CVPR | 3 |