Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Seong-Jin Jang 0002

dblp:18/4498-2 · also SeongJin Jang 0002 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 31% Memory systems · 27% Electronic design automation · 21%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Memory systems
DRAM
0.312017
Defect Analysis and Cost-Effective Resilience Architecture for Future DRAM Devices · HPCA 2017
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › memory fault tolerance
DRAM resilience
0.312017
Defect Analysis and Cost-Effective Resilience Architecture for Future DRAM Devices · HPCA 2017
Memory systems › DRAM
DRAM scaling
0.312017
Defect Analysis and Cost-Effective Resilience Architecture for Future DRAM Devices · HPCA 2017
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error correction › error-correcting codes
in-DRAM ECC
0.312017
Defect Analysis and Cost-Effective Resilience Architecture for Future DRAM Devices · HPCA 2017
Integrated circuit design
3d integration
0.212015
Design, packaging, and architectural policy co-optimization for DC power integrity in 3D DRAM · DAC 2015
Integrated circuit design
power delivery network
0.212015
Design, packaging, and architectural policy co-optimization for DC power integrity in 3D DRAM · DAC 2015
Electronic design automation
power integrity
0.212015
Design, packaging, and architectural policy co-optimization for DC power integrity in 3D DRAM · DAC 2015
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › error-correcting codes for memory
rank-level ECC
0.112017
Defect Analysis and Cost-Effective Resilience Architecture for Future DRAM Devices · HPCA 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.3measurement · 0.3regression analysis · 0.2optimization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Defect Analysis and Cost-Effective Resilience Architecture for Future DRAM Devices
abstract
Technology scaling has continuously improved the density, performance, energy efficiency, and cost of DRAM-based main memory systems. Starting from sub-20nm processes, however, the industry began to pay considerably higher costs to screen and manage notably increasing defective cells. The traditional technique, which replaces the rows/columns containing faulty cells with spare rows/columns, has been able to cost-effectively repair the defective cells so far, but it will become unaffordable soon because an excessive number of spare rows/columns are required to manage the increasing number of defective cells. This necessitates a synergistic application of an alternative resilience technique such as In-DRAM ECC with the traditional one. Through extensive measurement and simulation, we first identify that aggressive miniaturization makes DRAM cells more sensitive to random telegraph noise or variable retention time, which is dominantly manifested as a surge in randomly scattered single-cell faults. Second, we advocate using InDRAM ECC to overcome the DRAM scaling challenges and architect In-DRAM ECC to accomplish high area efficiency and minimal performance degradation. Moreover, we show that advancement in process technology reduces decoding/correction time to a small fraction of DRAM access time, and that the throughput penalty of a write operation due to an additional read for a parity update is mostly overcome by the multi-bank structure and long burst writes that span an entire In-DRAM ECC codeword. Lastly, we demonstrate that system reliability with modern rank-level ECC schemes such as single device data correction is further improved by hundred million times with the proposed In-DRAM ECC architecture.
Sang-uhn Cha, Seongil O, Hyunsung Shin, Sangjoon Hwang 0001, Kwang-Il Park, Seong-Jin Jang 0002, Joo-Sun Choi, Gyo-Young Jin, Young Hoon Son, Hyunyoon Cho, Jung Ho Ahn, Nam Sung Kim
HPCA6
2015 Design, packaging, and architectural policy co-optimization for DC power integrity in 3D DRAM
abstract
3D DRAM is the next-generation memory system targeting high bandwidth, low power, and small form factor. This paper presents a cross-domain CAD/architectural platform that addresses DC power noise issues in 3D DRAM targeting stacked DDR3, Wide I/O, and hybrid memory cube technologies. Our design and analysis include both individual DRAM dies and a host logic die that communicates with them in the same stack. Moreover, our comprehensive solutions encompass all major factors in design, packaging, and architecture domains, including power delivery network wire sizing, redistribution layer routing, distributed, and dedicated TSV placement, die bonding style, backside wire bonding, and read policy optimization. We conduct regression analysis and optimization to obtain high quality solutions under noise, cost, and performance tradeoff. Compared with industry standard baseline designs and policies, our methods achieve up to 68.2% IR-drop reduction and 30.6% performance enhancement.
Yarui Peng, Bon Woong Ku, Youn-Sik Park, Kwang-Il Park, Seong-Jin Jang 0002, Joo-Sun Choi, Sung Kyu Lim
DAC5
1993 A New Colum Redundancy Scheme For Fast Access Time of 64-Mb DRAM
Young-Hyun Jun, Weon-Hwa Jeong, Jong-Hoon Park, Seong-Wook Kim, Jae-Sik Lee, Seong-Jin Jang 0002, Chang-Man Khang, Hee-Gook Lee
ISCAS7