Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Sach Mukherjee

dblp:18/4697 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
16ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 9 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 64% Deep learning architectures and training · 26% Learning paradigms · 6%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
10 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 88% Medical and health informatics · 8% Computational science and engineering · 4%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 27 heaviest of 31, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent dynamics learning
0.812024
Invariance-based Learning of Latent Dynamics · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling
0.812024
Invariance-based Learning of Latent Dynamics · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
spatio-temporal transformer
0.812024
Invariance-based Learning of Latent Dynamics · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model
0.712023
Regularized Joint Mixture Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.522016
Estimating Causal Structure Using Conditional DAG Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
A Gibbs Sampler for Learning DAGs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
structure learning
0.522016
Estimating Causal Structure Using Conditional DAG Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
A Gibbs Sampler for Learning DAGs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › systems biology › kinetic modeling
biochemical kinetics modeling
0.532014
Causal network inference using biochemical kinetics · Bioinform. 2014
Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-Koshland kinetics · Bioinform. 2013
Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-koshland kinetics · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology
network inference
0.532014
Causal network inference using biochemical kinetics · Bioinform. 2014
Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-Koshland kinetics · Bioinform. 2013
Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-koshland kinetics · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis › network analysis
network clustering
0.422017
Molecular heterogeneity at the network level: high-dimensional testing, clustering and a TCGA case study · Bioinform. 2017
Network clustering: probing biological heterogeneity by sparse graphical models · Bioinform. 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery
0.412019
Causal Learning via Manifold Regularization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning › graph-based semi-supervised learning
manifold regularization
0.412019
Causal Learning via Manifold Regularization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference
0.432013
Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-Koshland kinetics · Bioinform. 2013
Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-koshland kinetics · Bioinform. 2012
Bayesian Inference of Signaling Network Topology in a Cancer Cell Line · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network
network biology
0.312017
Molecular heterogeneity at the network level: high-dimensional testing, clustering and a TCGA case study · Bioinform. 2017
Medical and health informatics › precision medicine
patient subgroup identification
0.312017
Molecular heterogeneity at the network level: high-dimensional testing, clustering and a TCGA case study · Bioinform. 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
causal graphical model
0.212016
Estimating Causal Structure Using Conditional DAG Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
directed acyclic graph learning
0.212016
A Gibbs Sampler for Learning DAGs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
gibbs sampling
0.212016
A Gibbs Sampler for Learning DAGs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.212016
A Gibbs Sampler for Learning DAGs · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › structure learning
score-based structure learning
0.212016
Estimating Causal Structure Using Conditional DAG Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
causal network inference
0.212014
Causal network inference using biochemical kinetics · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology
signaling network inference
0.112012
Bayesian Inference of Signaling Network Topology in a Cancer Cell Line · Bioinform. 2012
Computational science and engineering
graphical models
0.112011
Network clustering: probing biological heterogeneity by sparse graphical models · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.112010
Temporal clustering by affinity propagation reveals transcriptional modules in Arabidopsis thaliana · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation › gene regulatory network
gene regulatory module identification
0.112010
Temporal clustering by affinity propagation reveals transcriptional modules in Arabidopsis thaliana · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
time series clustering
0.112010
Temporal clustering by affinity propagation reveals transcriptional modules in Arabidopsis thaliana · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer biology
0.112009
Sparse combinatorial inference with an application in cancer biology · Bioinform. 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics
molecular data analysis
0.112016
Estimating Causal Structure Using Conditional DAG Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse regression · 1.3sparse graphical model · 1.3expectation-maximization · 1.3variational autoencoder · 0.8spatio-temporal transformer · 0.8semi-supervised learning · 0.8manifold regularization · 0.8bivariate histogram · 0.8bayesian inference · 0.4equilibrium analysis of chemical kinetics · 0.3high-dimensional statistics · 0.3score-based estimation · 0.2gibbs sampling · 0.2conditional DAG · 0.2causal structure learning · 0.2chemical reaction kinetics · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Invariance-based Learning of Latent Dynamics
abstract
We propose a new model class aimed at predicting dynamical trajectories from high-dimensional empirical data. This is done by combining variational autoencoders and (spatio-)temporal transformers within a framework designed to enforce certain scientifically-motivated invariances. The models allow inference of system behavior at any continuous time and generalization well beyond the data distributions seen during training. Furthermore, the models do not require an explicit neural ODE formulation, making them efficient and highly scalable in practice. We study behavior through simple theoretical analyses and extensive empirical experiments. The latter investigate the ability to predict the trajectories of complicated systems based on finite data and show that the proposed approaches can outperform existing neural-dynamical models. We study also more general inductive bias in the context of transfer to data obtained under entirely novel system interventions. Overall, our results provide a new framework for efficiently learning complicated dynamics in a data-driven manner, with potential applications in a wide range of fields including physics, biology, and engineering.
Kai Lagemann, Christian Lagemann, Sach Mukherjee
ICLR3
2023 Regularized Joint Mixture Models
abstract
Regularized regression models are well studied and, under appropriate conditions, offer fast and statistically interpretable results. However, large data in many applications are heterogeneous in the sense of harboring distributional differences between latent groups. Then, the assumption that the conditional distribution of response $Y$ given features $X$ is the same for all samples may not hold. Furthermore, in scientific applications, the covariance structure of the features may contain important signals and its learning is also affected by latent group structure. We propose a class of mixture models for paired data $(X,Y)$ that couples together the distribution of $X$ (using sparse graphical models) and the conditional $Y \! \mid \! X$ (using sparse regression models). The regression and graphical models are specific to the latent groups and model parameters are estimated jointly. This allows signals in either or both of the feature distribution and regression model to inform learning of latent structure and provides automatic control of confounding by such structure. Estimation is handled via an expectation-maximization algorithm, whose convergence is established theoretically. We illustrate the key ideas via empirical examples. An R package is available at https://github.com/k-perrakis/regjmix.
Konstantinos Perrakis, Thomas Lartigue, Frank Dondelinger, Sach Mukherjee
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2020 Evaluation of Causal Structure Learning Algorithms via Risk Estimation
abstract
Recent years have seen many advances in methods for causal structure learning from data. The empirical assessment of such methods, however, is much less developed. Motivated by this gap, we pose the following question: how can one assess, in a given problem setting, the practical efficacy of one or more causal structure learning methods? We formalize the problem in a decision-theoretic framework, via a notion of expected loss or risk for the causal setting. We introduce a theoretical notion of causal risk as well as sample quantities that can be computed from data, and study the relationship between the two, both theoretically and through an extensive simulation study. Our results provide an assumptions-light framework for assessing causal structure learning methods that can be applied in a range of practical use-cases.
Marco Eigenmann, Sach Mukherjee, Marloes H. Maathuis
UAI2
2019 Causal Learning via Manifold Regularization
abstract
This paper frames causal structure estimation as a machine learning task. The idea is to treat indicators of causal relationships between variables as `labels' and to exploit available data on the variables of interest to provide features for the labelling task. Background scientific knowledge or any available interventional data provide labels on some causal relationships and the remainder are treated as unlabelled. To illustrate the key ideas, we develop a distance-based approach (based on bivariate histograms) within a manifold regularization framework. We present empirical results on three different biological data sets (including examples where causal effects can be verified by experimental intervention), that together demonstrate the efficacy and general nature of the approach as well as its simplicity from a user's point of view.
Steven M. Hill, Chris J. Oates, Duncan A. J. Blythe, Sach Mukherjee
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2017 Molecular heterogeneity at the network level: high-dimensional testing, clustering and a TCGA case study
abstract
MOTIVATION: Molecular pathways and networks play a key role in basic and disease biology. An emerging notion is that networks encoding patterns of molecular interplay may themselves differ between contexts, such as cell type, tissue or disease (sub)type. However, while statistical testing of differences in mean expression levels has been extensively studied, testing of network differences remains challenging. Furthermore, since network differences could provide important and biologically interpretable information to identify molecular subgroups, there is a need to consider the unsupervised task of learning subgroups and networks that define them. This is a nontrivial clustering problem, with neither subgroups nor subgroup-specific networks known at the outset. RESULTS: We leverage recent ideas from high-dimensional statistics for testing and clustering in the network biology setting. The methods we describe can be applied directly to most continuous molecular measurements and networks do not need to be specified beforehand. We illustrate the ideas and methods in a case study using protein data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). This provides evidence that patterns of interplay between signalling proteins differ significantly between cancer types. Furthermore, we show how the proposed approaches can be used to learn subtypes and the molecular networks that define them. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: As the Bioconductor package nethet. CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Nicolas Städler, Frank Dondelinger, Steven M. Hill, Rehan Akbani, Yiling Lu, Gordon B. Mills, Sach Mukherjee
Bioinform.7
2016 A Gibbs Sampler for Learning DAGs
abstract
We propose a Gibbs sampler for structure learning in directed acyclic graph (DAG) models. The standard Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms used for learning DAGs are random-walk Metropolis-Hastings samplers. These samplers are guaranteed to converge asymptotically but often mix slowly when exploring the large graph spaces that arise in structure learning. In each step, the sampler we propose draws entire sets of parents for multiple nodes from the appropriate conditional distribution. This provides an efficient way to make large moves in graph space, permitting faster mixing whilst retaining asymptotic guarantees of convergence. The conditional distribution is related to variable selection with candidate parents playing the role of covariates or inputs. We empirically examine the performance of the sampler using several simulated and real data examples. The proposed method gives robust results in diverse settings, outperforming several existing Bayesian and frequentist methods. In addition, our empirical results shed some light on the relative merits of Bayesian and constraint- based methods for structure learning.
Robert J. B. Goudie, Sach Mukherjee
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2016 Estimating Causal Structure Using Conditional DAG Models
abstract
This paper considers inference of causal structure in a class of graphical models called conditional DAGs. These are directed acyclic graph (DAG) models with two kinds of variables, primary and secondary. The secondary variables are used to aid in the estimation of the structure of causal relationships between the primary variables. We prove that, under certain assumptions, such causal structure is identifiable from the joint observational distribution of the primary and secondary variables. We give causal semantics for the model class, put forward a score-based approach for estimation and establish consistency results. Empirical results demonstrate gains compared with formulations that treat all variables on an equal footing, or that ignore secondary variables. The methodology is motivated by applications in biology that involve multiple data types and is illustrated here using simulated data and in an analysis of molecular data from the Cancer Genome Atlas.
Chris J. Oates, Jim Q. Smith, Sach Mukherjee
J. Mach. Learn. Res.3
2014 Joint Structure Learning of Multiple Non-Exchangeable Networks
abstract
Several methods have recently been developed for joint structure learning of multiple (related) graphical models or networks. These methods treat individual networks as exchangeable, such that each pair of networks are equally encouraged to have similar structures. However, in many practical applications, exchangeability in this sense does not hold, as some pairs of networks may be more closely related than others, for example due to group and sub-group structures in the data. Here we present a novel Bayesian formulation that generalises joint structure learning beyond the exchangeable case. Moreover (i) a novel default prior over the joint structure space is proposed that requires no user input; (ii) latent networks are permitted; (iii) for time series data and dynamic Bayesian networks, an efficient, exact algorithm is provided. We present empirical results on non-exchangeable populations, including a real example from cancer biology, where cell-line specific networks are related according to known genomic features.
Chris J. Oates, Sach Mukherjee
AISTATS2
2014 Causal network inference using biochemical kinetics
abstract
MOTIVATION: Networks are widely used as structural summaries of biochemical systems. Statistical estimation of networks is usually based on linear or discrete models. However, the dynamics of biochemical systems are generally non-linear, suggesting that suitable non-linear formulations may offer gains with respect to causal network inference and aid in associated prediction problems. RESULTS: We present a general framework for network inference and dynamical prediction using time course data that is rooted in non-linear biochemical kinetics. This is achieved by considering a dynamical system based on a chemical reaction graph with associated kinetic parameters. Both the graph and kinetic parameters are treated as unknown; inference is carried out within a Bayesian framework. This allows prediction of dynamical behavior even when the underlying reaction graph itself is unknown or uncertain. Results, based on (i) data simulated from a mechanistic model of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling and (ii) phosphoproteomic data from cancer cell lines, demonstrate that non-linear formulations can yield gains in causal network inference and permit dynamical prediction and uncertainty quantification in the challenging setting where the reaction graph is unknown. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: MATLAB R2014a software is available to download from warwick.ac.uk/chrisoates. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Chris J. Oates, Frank Dondelinger, Nora Bayani, James Korkola, Joe W. Gray, Sach Mukherjee
Bioinform.6
2013 Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-Koshland kinetics
abstract
MOTIVATION: Network inference approaches are widely used to shed light on regulatory interplay between molecular players such as genes and proteins. Biochemical processes underlying networks of interest (e.g. gene regulatory or protein signalling networks) are generally nonlinear. In many settings, knowledge is available concerning relevant chemical kinetics. However, existing network inference methods for continuous, steady-state data are typically rooted in statistical formulations, which do not exploit chemical kinetics to guide inference. RESULTS: Herein, we present an approach to network inference for steady-state data that is rooted in non-linear descriptions of biochemical mechanism. We use equilibrium analysis of chemical kinetics to obtain functional forms that are in turn used to infer networks using steady-state data. The approach we propose is directly applicable to conventional steady-state gene expression or proteomic data and does not require knowledge of either network topology or any kinetic parameters. We illustrate the approach in the context of protein phosphorylation networks, using data simulated from a recent mechanistic model and proteomic data from cancer cell lines. In the former, the true network is known and used for assessment, whereas in the latter, results are compared against known biochemistry. We find that the proposed methodology is more effective at estimating network topology than methods based on linear models. AVAILABILITY: mukherjeelab.nki.nl/CODE/GK_Kinetics.zip CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Chris J. Oates, Bryan T. J. Hennessy, Yiling Lu, Gordon B. Mills, Sach Mukherjee
Bioinform.5
2012 Bayesian Inference of Signaling Network Topology in a Cancer Cell Line
abstract
MOTIVATION: Protein signaling networks play a key role in cellular function, and their dysregulation is central to many diseases, including cancer. To shed light on signaling network topology in specific contexts, such as cancer, requires interrogation of multiple proteins through time and statistical approaches to make inferences regarding network structure. RESULTS: In this study, we use dynamic Bayesian networks to make inferences regarding network structure and thereby generate testable hypotheses. We incorporate existing biology using informative network priors, weighted objectively by an empirical Bayes approach, and exploit a connection between variable selection and network inference to enable exact calculation of posterior probabilities of interest. The approach is computationally efficient and essentially free of user-set tuning parameters. Results on data where the true, underlying network is known place the approach favorably relative to existing approaches. We apply these methods to reverse-phase protein array time-course data from a breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-468) to predict signaling links that we independently validate using targeted inhibition. The methods proposed offer a general approach by which to elucidate molecular networks specific to biological context, including, but not limited to, human cancers. AVAILABILITY: http://mukherjeelab.nki.nl/DBN (code and data).
Steven M. Hill, Yiling Lu, Jennifer Molina, Laura Heiser, Paul T. Spellman, Terence P. Speed, Joe W. Gray, Gordon B. Mills, Sach Mukherjee
Bioinform.9
2012 Network inference using steady-state data and Goldbeter-koshland kinetics
abstract
Abstract Motivation: Network inference approaches are widely used to shed light on regulatory interplay between molecular players such as genes and proteins. Biochemical processes underlying networks of interest (e.g. gene regulatory or protein signalling networks) are generally nonlinear. In many settings, knowledge is available concerning relevant chemical kinetics. However, existing network inference methods for continuous, steady-state data are typically rooted in statistical formulations, which do not exploit chemical kinetics to guide inference. Results: Herein, we present an approach to network inference for steady-state data that is rooted in non-linear descriptions of biochemical mechanism. We use equilibrium analysis of chemical kinetics to obtain functional forms that are in turn used to infer networks using steady-state data. The approach we propose is directly applicable to conventional steady-state gene expression or proteomic data and does not require knowledge of either network topology or any kinetic parameters. We illustrate the approach in the context of protein phosphorylation networks, using data simulated from a recent mechanistic model and proteomic data from cancer cell lines. In the former, the true network is known and used for assessment, whereas in the latter, results are compared against known biochemistry. We find that the proposed methodology is more effective at estimating network topology than methods based on linear models. Availability: mukherjeelab.nki.nl/CODE/GK_Kinetics.zip Contact: [email protected]; [email protected] Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Chris J. Oates, Bryan T. J. Hennessy, Yiling Lu, Gordon B. Mills, Sach Mukherjee
Bioinform.5
2012 Integrating biological knowledge into variable selection: an empirical Bayes approach with an application in cancer biology
abstract
BACKGROUND: An important question in the analysis of biochemical data is that of identifying subsets of molecular variables that may jointly influence a biological response. Statistical variable selection methods have been widely used for this purpose. In many settings, it may be important to incorporate ancillary biological information concerning the variables of interest. Pathway and network maps are one example of a source of such information. However, although ancillary information is increasingly available, it is not always clear how it should be used nor how it should be weighted in relation to primary data. RESULTS: We put forward an approach in which biological knowledge is incorporated using informative prior distributions over variable subsets, with prior information selected and weighted in an automated, objective manner using an empirical Bayes formulation. We employ continuous, linear models with interaction terms and exploit biochemically-motivated sparsity constraints to permit exact inference. We show an example of priors for pathway- and network-based information and illustrate our proposed method on both synthetic response data and by an application to cancer drug response data. Comparisons are also made to alternative Bayesian and frequentist penalised-likelihood methods for incorporating network-based information. CONCLUSIONS: The empirical Bayes method proposed here can aid prior elicitation for Bayesian variable selection studies and help to guard against mis-specification of priors. Empirical Bayes, together with the proposed pathway-based priors, results in an approach with a competitive variable selection performance. In addition, the overall procedure is fast, deterministic, and has very few user-set parameters, yet is capable of capturing interplay between molecular players. The approach presented is general and readily applicable in any setting with multiple sources of biological prior knowledge.
Steven M. Hill, Richard M. Neve, Nora Bayani, Wen-Lin Kuo, Safiyyah Ziyad, Paul T. Spellman, Joe W. Gray, Sach Mukherjee
BMC Bioinform.8
2011 Network clustering: probing biological heterogeneity by sparse graphical models
abstract
MOTIVATION: Networks and pathways are important in describing the collective biological function of molecular players such as genes or proteins. In many areas of biology, for example in cancer studies, available data may harbour undiscovered subtypes which differ in terms of network phenotype. That is, samples may be heterogeneous with respect to underlying molecular networks. This motivates a need for unsupervised methods capable of discovering such subtypes and elucidating the corresponding network structures. RESULTS: We exploit recent results in sparse graphical model learning to put forward a 'network clustering' approach in which data are partitioned into subsets that show evidence of underlying, subset-level network structure. This allows us to simultaneously learn subset-specific networks and corresponding subset membership under challenging small-sample conditions. We illustrate this approach on synthetic and proteomic data. AVAILABILITY: go.warwick.ac.uk/sachmukherjee/networkclustering.
Sach Mukherjee, Steven M. Hill
Bioinform.1
2010 Temporal clustering by affinity propagation reveals transcriptional modules in Arabidopsis thaliana
abstract
MOTIVATION: Identifying regulatory modules is an important task in the exploratory analysis of gene expression time series data. Clustering algorithms are often used for this purpose. However, gene regulatory events may induce complex temporal features in a gene expression profile, including time delays, inversions and transient correlations, which are not well accounted for by current clustering methods. As the cost of microarray experiments continues to fall, the temporal resolution of time course studies is increasing. This has led to a need to take account of detailed temporal features of this kind. Thus, while standard clustering methods are both widely used and much studied, their shared shortcomings with respect to such temporal features motivates the work presented here. RESULTS: Here, we introduce a temporal clustering approach for high-dimensional gene expression data which takes account of time delays, inversions and transient correlations. We do so by exploiting a recently introduced, message-passing-based algorithm called Affinity Propagation (AP). We take account of temporal features of interest following an approximate but efficient dynamic programming approach due to Qian et al. The resulting approach is demonstrably effective in its ability to discern non-obvious temporal features, yet efficient and robust enough for routine use as an exploratory tool. We show results on validated transcription factor-target pairs in yeast and on gene expression data from a study of Arabidopsis thaliana under pathogen infection. The latter reveals a number of biologically striking findings. AVAILABILITY: Matlab code for our method is available at http://www.wsbc.warwick.ac.uk/stevenkiddle/tcap.html.
Steven J. Kiddle, Oliver P. F. Windram, Stuart McHattie, Andrew Meade, Jim Beynon, Vicky Buchanan-Wollaston, Katherine J. Denby, Sach Mukherjee
Bioinform.8
2009 Sparse combinatorial inference with an application in cancer biology
abstract
MOTIVATION: Combinatorial effects, in which several variables jointly influence an output or response, play an important role in biological systems. In many settings, Boolean functions provide a natural way to describe such influences. However, biochemical data using which we may wish to characterize such influences are usually subject to much variability. Furthermore, in high-throughput biological settings Boolean relationships of interest are very often sparse, in the sense of being embedded in an overall dataset of higher dimensionality. This motivates a need for statistical methods capable of making inferences regarding Boolean functions under conditions of noise and sparsity. RESULTS: We put forward a statistical model for sparse, noisy Boolean functions and methods for inference under the model. We focus on the case in which the form of the underlying Boolean function, as well as the number and identity of its inputs are all unknown. We present results on synthetic data and on a study of signalling proteins in cancer biology.
Sach Mukherjee, Steven Pelech, Richard M. Neve, Wen-Lin Kuo, Safiyyah Ziyad, Paul T. Spellman, Joe W. Gray, Terence P. Speed
Bioinform.1