Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Todd E. Ehrhart
dblp:18/4866
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 70% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
execution replay |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Reducing the Scheduling Critical Cycle Using Wakeup Prediction · HPCA 2004 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Reducing the Scheduling Critical Cycle Using Wakeup Prediction · HPCA 2004 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
pipelining |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Reducing the Scheduling Critical Cycle Using Wakeup Prediction · HPCA 2004 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
superscalar processor |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Reducing the Scheduling Critical Cycle Using Wakeup Prediction · HPCA 2004 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
gradient-descent minimum-searching · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | Reducing the Scheduling Critical Cycle Using Wakeup PredictionabstractFor highest performance, a modern microprocessor must be able to determine if an instruction is ready in the same cycle in which it is to be selected for execution. This creates a cycle of logic involving wakeup and select. However, the time a static instruction spends waiting for wakeup shows little dynamic variance. This idea is used to build a machine where wakeup times are predicted, and instructions executed too early are replayed. This form of self-scheduling reduces the critical cycle by eliminating the wakeup logic at the expense of additional replays. However, replays and other pipeline effects affect the cost of misprediction. To solve this, an allowance is added to the predicted wakeup time to decrease the probability of a replay. This allowance may be associated with individual instructions or the global state, and is dynamically adjusted by a gradient-descent minimum-searching technique. When processor load is low, prediction may be more aggressive — increasing the chance of replays, but increasing performance, so the aggressiveness of the predictor is dynamically adjusted using processor load as a feedback parameter. Todd E. Ehrhart, Sanjay J. Patel |
HPCA | 1 |