Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Todd E. Ehrhart

dblp:18/4866 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 70% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
execution replay
0.012004
Reducing the Scheduling Critical Cycle Using Wakeup Prediction · HPCA 2004
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction scheduling
0.012004
Reducing the Scheduling Critical Cycle Using Wakeup Prediction · HPCA 2004
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
pipelining
0.012004
Reducing the Scheduling Critical Cycle Using Wakeup Prediction · HPCA 2004
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
superscalar processor
0.012004
Reducing the Scheduling Critical Cycle Using Wakeup Prediction · HPCA 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

gradient-descent minimum-searching · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Reducing the Scheduling Critical Cycle Using Wakeup Prediction
abstract
For highest performance, a modern microprocessor must be able to determine if an instruction is ready in the same cycle in which it is to be selected for execution. This creates a cycle of logic involving wakeup and select. However, the time a static instruction spends waiting for wakeup shows little dynamic variance. This idea is used to build a machine where wakeup times are predicted, and instructions executed too early are replayed. This form of self-scheduling reduces the critical cycle by eliminating the wakeup logic at the expense of additional replays. However, replays and other pipeline effects affect the cost of misprediction. To solve this, an allowance is added to the predicted wakeup time to decrease the probability of a replay. This allowance may be associated with individual instructions or the global state, and is dynamically adjusted by a gradient-descent minimum-searching technique. When processor load is low, prediction may be more aggressive — increasing the chance of replays, but increasing performance, so the aggressiveness of the predictor is dynamically adjusted using processor load as a feedback parameter.
Todd E. Ehrhart, Sanjay J. Patel
HPCA1