Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiang Su
dblp:18/4952
· DBLP profile ↗
23ranked-venue papers
9as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-4020-9151ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 18 · 8 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 45% Efficient and distributed learning · 20% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 50% Information retrieval · 50% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | EagleEye: Fast Sub-net Evaluation for Efficient Neural Network Pruning · ECCV (2) 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network
bayesian network classifiers |
0.3 | 4 | 2011 | Large Scale Text Classification using Semisupervised Multinomial Naive Bayes · ICML 2011 Discriminative parameter learning for Bayesian networks · ICML 2008 Full Bayesian network classifiers · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › bayesian network › bayesian network classifiers
naive bayes |
0.2 | 3 | 2011 | Large Scale Text Classification using Semisupervised Multinomial Naive Bayes · ICML 2011 Augmenting naive Bayes for ranking · ICML 2005 Hidden Naive Bayes · AAAI 2005 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Large Scale Text Classification using Semisupervised Multinomial Naive Bayes · ICML 2011 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
bayesian network |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Full Bayesian network classifiers · ICML 2006 Augmenting naive Bayes for ranking · ICML 2005 |
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | Augmenting naive Bayes for ranking · ICML 2005 Learning Conditional Independence Tree for Ranking · ICDM 2004 |
Information retrieval
ranking |
0.1 | 2 | 2005 | Augmenting naive Bayes for ranking · ICML 2005 Learning Conditional Independence Tree for Ranking · ICDM 2004 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › acoustic model training
discriminative training |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Discriminative parameter learning for Bayesian networks · ICML 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
parameter estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Discriminative parameter learning for Bayesian networks · ICML 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
conditional independence |
0.1 | 2 | 2006 | Representing Conditional Independence Using Decision Trees · AAAI 2005 Full Bayesian network classifiers · ICML 2006 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
structure learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Full Bayesian network classifiers · ICML 2006 |
Algorithms and data structures › decision tree
decision tree learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A Fast Decision Tree Learning Algorithm · AAAI 2006 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Hidden Naive Bayes · AAAI 2005 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
decision tree |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Representing Conditional Independence Using Decision Trees · AAAI 2005 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Representing Conditional Independence Using Decision Trees · AAAI 2005 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Large Scale Text Classification using Semisupervised Multinomial Naive Bayes · ICML 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pruning · 0.4evolutionary search · 0.4decision tree learning · 0.2semi-supervised learning · 0.1multinomial naive bayes · 0.1hidden naive bayes · 0.1maximum likelihood estimation · 0.1discriminative frequency estimate · 0.1conditional probability table learning · 0.1tree-augmented naive bayes · 0.1selective bayesian classifier · 0.1decision tree · 0.1naive bayes · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Adaptive gated embedding and cross-modal semantic fusion for multimodal knowledge graph completion
Jiang Su, Juanjuan Yao |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 1 |
| 2021 | Deductive Reinforcement Learning for Visual Autonomous Urban Driving NavigationabstractExisting deep reinforcement learning (RL) are devoted to research applications on video games, e.g., The Open Racing Car Simulator (TORCS) and Atari games. However, it remains under-explored for vision-based autonomous urban driving navigation (VB-AUDN). VB-AUDN requires a sophisticated agent working safely in structured, changing, and unpredictable environments; otherwise, inappropriate operations may lead to irreversible or catastrophic damages. In this work, we propose a deductive RL (DeRL) to address this challenge. A deduction reasoner (DR) is introduced to endow the agent with ability to foresee the future and to promote policy learning. Specifically, DR first predicts future transitions through a parameterized environment model. Then, DR conducts self-assessment at the predicted trajectory to perceive the consequences of current policy resulting in a more reliable decision-making process. Additionally, a semantic encoder module (SEM) is designed to extract compact driving representation from the raw images, which is robust to the changes of the environment. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that DeRL outperforms the state-of-the-art model-free RL approaches on the public CAR Learning to Act (CARLA) benchmark and presents a superior performance on success rate and driving safety for goal-directed navigation. Changxin Huang, Meizi Ouyang, Pengxu Wei, Junfan Lin, Jiang Su, Liang Lin 0004 |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. | 6 |
| 2020 | EagleEye: Fast Sub-net Evaluation for Efficient Neural Network Pruning
Bailin Li, Jiang Su, Guangrun Wang |
ECCV (2) | 3 |
| 2019 | QoS adaptive and energy aware cross-layer opportunistic routing protocol in wireless sensor networksabstractWireless sensor network (WSN) can reduce human labour and monitoring difficulties in forest fire prevention and environment monitoring due to its low power consumption, small size, self‐organising, flexible setting, and unattended operation. However, the limited WSN hardware resources and power capacity, the practical application requirements such as real‐time monitoring and timely warning of emergencies, pose higher challenges to WSN on its lifespan, reliability, and real‐time performance. This paper proposes a QoS adaptive and energy aware cross‐layer opportunistic routing protocol (QE‐COR). The protocol sets an adaptive QoS function Q i comprehensively considering multiple metrics, through which the best forwarding node can be selected, and the QoS of transmission can adaptively adjust according to the data's needs. The protocol can also select a standby node to start retransmission when forwarding errors occur. A RTS‐QACK and an ASS‐DATA‐SACK response mechanisms are designed to improve the transmission efficiency and avoid message conflicts. The sleep mechanism of MAC layer related with node's working state enables dynamical switching between active and sleep modes, which improves the energy utilisation and the flexibility of the network. Compared with similar opportunistic routing protocols, QE‐COR can improve energy utilisation and extend network lifetime, while ensuring transmission reliability and end‐to‐end delay performance. Jiang Tao, Jiang Su, Wangping Xiong |
IET Commun. | 3 |
| 2017 | Toward Energy-Efficient and Robust Clustering Algorithm on Mobile Ad Hoc Sensor Networks
Tailong Xiao, Anfeng Liu, Jiang Su |
COCOA (2) | 4 |
| 2016 | Increasing Network Size and Training Throughput of FPGA Restricted Boltzmann Machines Using DropoutabstractRestricted Boltzmann Machines (RBMs) are widely used in modern machine learning tasks. Existing implementations are limited in network size and training throughput by available DSP resources. In this work we propose a new algorithm and architecture for FPGAs called dropout-RBM (dRBM) system. Compared to the state-of-art design methods on the same FPGA, dRBM with a dropout rate 0.5 doubles the maximum affordable network size using only half of DSP and BRAM resources. This is achieved by an application of a technique called dropout, which is a relatively new method used to avoid overfitting of data. Here we instead apply dropout as a technique for reducing the required DSPs and BRAM resources, while also having the side-effect of increasing robustness of training. Also to improve the processing throughput, we propose a multi-mode matrix multiplication module that maximizes the DSP efficiency. For the MNIST classificationbenchmark, a Stratix IV EP4SGX530 FPGA running dRBM is 34x faster than a single-precision Matlab implementation running on Intel i7 2.9GHz CPU. Jiang Su, David B. Thomas, Peter Y. K. Cheung |
FCCM | 1 |
| 2012 | Hypergraph matching based on Marginalized Constrained Compatibility
Jiang Su, Peng Ren 0001, Edwin R. Hancock |
ICPR | 1 |
| 2012 | Improving multi-view semi-supervised learning with agreement-based samplingabstractSemi-supervised learning algorithms are widely used to build strong learning models when there are not enough labeled instances. Some semi-supervised learning algorithms, including co-training and co-EM, use multiple views to build learning models. P Jelber Sayyad-Shirabad, Stan Matwin, Jiang Su |
Intell. Data Anal. | 4 |
| 2011 | Large Scale Text Classification using Semisupervised Multinomial Naive Bayes
Jiang Su, Jelber Sayyad Shirab, Stan Matwin |
ICML | 1 |
| 2008 | Discriminative parameter learning for Bayesian networksabstractBayesian network classifiers have been widely used for classification problems. Given a fixed Bayesian network structure, parameters learning can take two different approaches: generative and discriminative learning. While generative parameter learning is more efficient, discriminative parameter learning is more effective. In this paper, we propose a simple, efficient, and effective discriminative parameter learning method, called Discriminative Frequency Estimate (DFE), which learns parameters by discriminatively computing frequencies from data. Empirical studies show that the DFE algorithm integrates the advantages of both generative and discriminative learning: it performs as well as the state-of-the-art discriminative parameter learning method ELR in accuracy, but is significantly more efficient. Jiang Su, Harry Zhang, Charles Ling 0001, Stan Matwin |
ICML | 1 |
| 2008 | Naive Bayes for optimal rankingabstractIt is well known that naive Bayes performs surprisingly well in classification, but its probability estimation is poor. AUC (the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve) is a measure different from classification accuracy and probability estimation, which is often used to measure the quality of rankings. Indeed, an accurate ranking of examples is often more desirable than a mere classification. What is the general performance of naive Bayes in yielding optimal ranking, measured by AUC? In this paper, we study it systematically by both empirical experiments and theoretical analysis. In our experiments, we compare naive Bayes with a state-of-the-art decision-tree learning algorithm C4.4 for ranking, and some popular extensions of naive Bayes which achieve a significant improvement over naive Bayes in classification, such as the selective Bayesian classifier (SBC) and tree-augmented naive Bayes (TAN). Our experimental results show that naive Bayes performs significantly better than C4.4 and comparably with TAN. This provides empirical evidence that naive Bayes performs well in ranking. Then we analyse theoretically the optimality of naive Bayes in ranking. We study two example problems: conjunctive concepts and m-of-n concepts, which have been used in analysing the performance of naive Bayes in classification. Surprisingly, naive Bayes performs optimally on them in ranking, even though it does not in classification. We present and prove a sufficient condition for the optimality of naive Bayes in ranking. From both empirical and theoretical studies, we believe that naive Bayes is a competitive model for ranking. Harry Zhang, Jiang Su |
J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. | 2 |
| 2006 | A Fast Decision Tree Learning Algorithm
Jiang Su, Harry Zhang |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2006 | Full Bayesian network classifiersabstractThe structure of a Bayesian network (BN) encodes variable independence. Learning the structure of a BN, however, is typically of high computational complexity. In this paper, we explore and represent variable independence in learning conditional probability tables (CPTs), instead of in learning structure. A full Bayesian network is used as the structure and a decision tree is learned for each CPT. The resulting model is called full Bayesian network classifiers (FBCs). In learning an FBC, learning the decision trees for CPTs captures essentially both variable independence and context-specific independence. We present a novel, efficient decision tree learning, which is also effective in the context of FBC learning. In our experiments, the FBC learning algorithm demonstrates better performance in both classification and ranking compared with other state-of-the-art learning algorithms. In addition, its reduced effort on structure learning makes its time complexity quite low as well. Jiang Su, Harry Zhang |
ICML | 1 |
| 2006 | Learning probabilistic decision trees for AUC
Harry Zhang, Jiang Su |
Pattern Recognit. Lett. | 2 |
| 2005 | Representing Conditional Independence Using Decision Trees
Jiang Su, Harry Zhang |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2005 | Hidden Naive Bayes
Harry Zhang, Liangxiao Jiang, Jiang Su |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2005 | One Dependence Augmented Naive Bayes
Liangxiao Jiang, Harry Zhang, Zhihua Cai, Jiang Su |
ADMA | 4 |
| 2005 | Learning k-Nearest Neighbor Naive Bayes for Ranking
Liangxiao Jiang, Harry Zhang, Jiang Su |
ADMA | 3 |
| 2005 | Learning Tree Augmented Naive Bayes for Ranking
Liangxiao Jiang, Harry Zhang, Zhihua Cai, Jiang Su |
DASFAA | 4 |
| 2005 | Augmenting naive Bayes for rankingabstractNaive Bayes is an effective and efficient learning algorithm in classification. In many applications, however, an accurate ranking of instances based on the class probability is more desirable. Unfortunately, naive Bayes has been found to produce poor probability estimates. Numerous techniques have been proposed to extend naive Bayes for better classification accuracy, of which selective Bayesian classifiers (SBC) (Langley & Sage, 1994), tree-augmented naive Bayes (TAN) (Friedman et al., 1997), NBTree (Kohavi, 1996), boosted naive Bayes (Elkan, 1997), and AODE (Webb et al., 2005) achieve remarkable improvement over naive Bayes in terms of classification accuracy. An interesting question is: Do these techniques also produce accurate ranking? In this paper, we first conduct a systematic experimental study on their efficacy for ranking. Then, we propose a new approach to augmenting naive Bayes for generating accurate ranking, called hidden naive Bayes (HNB). In an HNB, a hidden parent is created for each attribute to represent the influences from all other attributes, and thus a more accurate ranking is expected. HNB inherits the structural simplicity of naive Bayes and can be easily learned without structure learning. Our experiments show that HNB outperforms naive Bayes, SBC, boosted naive Bayes, NBTree, and TAN significantly, and performs slightly better than AODE in ranking. Harry Zhang, Liangxiao Jiang, Jiang Su |
ICML | 3 |
| 2004 | Naive Bayesian Classifiers for Ranking
Harry Zhang, Jiang Su |
ECML | 2 |
| 2004 | Conditional Independence Trees
Harry Zhang, Jiang Su |
ECML | 2 |
| 2004 | Learning Conditional Independence Tree for RankingabstractAccurate ranking is desired in many real-world data mining applications. Traditional learning algorithms, however, aim only at high classification accuracy. It has been observed that both traditional decision trees and naive Bayes produce good classification accuracy but poor probability estimates. In this paper, we use a new model, conditional independence tree (CITree), which is a combination of decision tree and naive Bayes and more suitable for ranking and more learnable in practice. We propose a novel algorithm for learning CITree for ranking, and the experiments show that the CITree algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art decision tree learning algorithm C4.4 and naive Bayes significantly in yielding accurate rankings. Our work provides an effective data mining algorithm for applications in which an accurate ranking is required. Jiang Su, Harry Zhang |
ICDM | 1 |