Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Simon Schenk

dblp:18/524 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0003-3024-6135ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 4 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Wearable and physiological sensing · 77% Accessibility and assistive technology · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Graph data management · 33% Data models and query languages · 33% Data integration and cleaning · 33%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wearable and physiological sensing › eye tracking
gaze-based interaction
0.312017
GazeEverywhere: Enabling Gaze-only User Interaction on an Unmodified Desktop PC in Everyday Scenarios · CHI 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge-based systems › rule-based systems
rule-based reasoning
0.112008
Networked graphs: a declarative mechanism for SPARQL rules, SPARQL views and RDF data integration on the web · WWW 2008
Data integration and cleaning › semantic integration
RDF data integration
0.112008
Networked graphs: a declarative mechanism for SPARQL rules, SPARQL views and RDF data integration on the web · WWW 2008
Graph data management › graph data model
RDF data model
0.112008
Networked graphs: a declarative mechanism for SPARQL rules, SPARQL views and RDF data integration on the web · WWW 2008
Data models and query languages › RDF query language
SPARQL
0.112008
Networked graphs: a declarative mechanism for SPARQL rules, SPARQL views and RDF data integration on the web · WWW 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online recalibration · 0.3case study · 0.3ISO 9241-9 evaluation · 0.3declarative graph definition · 0.2SPARQL views · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 GazeEverywhere: Enabling Gaze-only User Interaction on an Unmodified Desktop PC in Everyday Scenarios
abstract
Eye tracking is becoming more and more affordable, and thus gaze has the potential to become a viable input modality for human-computer interaction. We present the GazeEverywhere solution that can replace the mouse with gaze control by adding a transparent layer on top of the system GUI. It comprises three parts: i) the SPOCK interaction method that is based on smooth pursuit eye movements and does not suffer from the Midas touch problem; ii) an online recalibration algorithm that continuously improves gaze-tracking accuracy using the SPOCK target projections as reference points; and iii) an optional hardware setup utilizing head-up display technology to project superimposed dynamic stimuli onto the PC screen where a software modification of the system is not feasible. In validation experiments, we show that GazeEverywhere's throughput according to ISO 9241-9 was improved over dwell time based interaction methods and nearly reached trackpad level. Online recalibration reduced interaction target ('button') size by about 25%. Finally, a case study showed that users were able to browse the internet and successfully run Wikirace using gaze only, without any plug-ins or other modifications.
Simon Schenk, Marc Dreiser, Gerhard Rigoll, Michael Dorr
CHI1
2015 A layered interface-adaptation architecture for distributed component-based systems
Thomas Pramsohler, Simon Schenk, Andreas Barthels, Uwe Baumgarten
Future Gener. Comput. Syst.2
2013 Towards an Optimized Software Architecture for Component Adaptation at Middleware Level
Thomas Pramsohler, Simon Schenk, Uwe Baumgarten
ECSA2
2011 Using provenance to debug changing ontologies
Simon Schenk, Renata Queiroz Dividino, Steffen Staab
J. Web Semant.1
2009 SemaPlorer - Interactive semantic exploration of data and media based on a federated cloud infrastructure
Simon Schenk, Carsten Saathoff, Steffen Staab, Ansgar Scherp
J. Web Semant.1
2008 Model Driven Specification of Ontology Translations
Fernando Silva Parreiras, Steffen Staab, Simon Schenk, Andreas Winter 0001
ER3
2008 On the Semantics of Trust and Caching in the Semantic Web
Simon Schenk
ISWC1
2008 Networked graphs: a declarative mechanism for SPARQL rules, SPARQL views and RDF data integration on the web
abstract
Easy reuse and integration of declaratively described information in a distributed setting is one of the main motivations for building the Semantic Web. Despite of this claim, reuse and recombination of RDF data today is mostly done using data replication and procedural code. A simple declarative mechanism for reusing and combining RDF data would help users to generate content for the semantic web. Having such a mechanism, the Semantic Web could better benefit from user generated content, as it is broadly present in the so called Web 2.0, but also from better linkage of existing content.We propose Networked Graphs, which allow users to define RDF graphs both, by extensionally listing content, but also by using views on other graphs. These views can be used to include parts of other graphs, to transform data before including it and to denote rules. The relationships between graphs are described declaratively using SPARQL queries and an extension of the SPARQL semantics. Networked Graphs are easily exchangeable between and interpretable on different computers. Using existing protocols, Networked Graphss can be evaluated in a distributed setting.
Simon Schenk, Steffen Staab
WWW1
2006 Lifecycle Knowledge Management: Getting the Semantics Across in X-Media
Steffen Staab, Thomas Franz, Olaf Görlitz, Carsten Saathoff, Simon Schenk, Sergej Sizov
ISMIS5