Kaan Katircioglu

dblp:18/588 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 70% Performance modeling and evaluation · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing
cluster resource management and scheduling
0.112005
An on-line, business-oriented optimization of performance and availability for utility computing · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2005
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.112005
An on-line, business-oriented optimization of performance and availability for utility computing · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2005
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource allocation
server allocation
0.112005
An on-line, business-oriented optimization of performance and availability for utility computing · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2005
Cloud and datacenter computing
utility computing
0.012005
An on-line, business-oriented optimization of performance and availability for utility computing · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2005

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

queueing model · 0.1closed-form approximation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 A framework for applying inventory control to capacity management for utility computing
abstract
A key concern in utility computing is managing capacity so that application service providers (ASPs) and computing utilities (CUs) operate in a cost effective way. To this end, we propose a framework for applying inventory control to capacity management for utility computing. The framework consists of: conceptual foundations (e.g., establishing connections between concepts in utility computing and those in inventory control); problem formulations (e.g., what factors should be considered and how they affect computational complexity); and quality of service (QoS) forecasting, which is predicting the future effect on QoS of ASP and CU actions taken in the current period (a critical consideration in searching the space of possible solutions).
Joseph L. Hellerstein, Kaan Katircioglu, Maheswaran Surendra
Integrated Network Management2
2005 An on-line, business-oriented optimization of performance and availability for utility computing
abstract
Utility computing provides a pay-as-you-go approach to information systems in which application providers (e.g., web sites) can better manage their costs by adding capacity in response to increased demands and shedding capacity when it is no longer needed. This paper addresses application providers who use clusters of servers. Our work develops a framework to determine the number of servers that minimizes the sum of quality-of-service (QoS) costs resulting from service level penalties and server holding costs for the server cluster. The server characteristics considered are service rate, failure rates, repair rates, and costs. The contributions of this paper are: 1) a model for the performance and availability of an e-Commerce system that is consistent with data from a multisystem testbed with an e-Commerce workload; 2) a business-oriented cost model for resource allocation for application providers; 3) a closed form approximation for the optimal allocation of servers for an application provider based on the performance model in 1) and the cost model in 2); and 4) a simple criteria for utility owners and server manufacturers to make tradeoffs between server characteristics.
Joseph L. Hellerstein, Kaan Katircioglu, Maheswaran Surendra
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.2