Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Colin L. Carter

dblp:18/6065 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 77% Data integration and cleaning · 23%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
attribute-oriented induction
0.011998
Efficient Attribute-Oriented Generalization for Knowledge Discovery from Large Databases · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

online algorithm · 0.0incremental generalization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Mining Market Basket Data Using Share Measures and Characterized Itemsets
Robert J. Hilderman, Colin L. Carter, Howard J. Hamilton, Nick Cercone
PAKDD2
1998 Efficient Attribute-Oriented Generalization for Knowledge Discovery from Large Databases
abstract
We present GDBR (Generalize DataBase Relation) and FIGR (Fast, Incremental Generalization and Regeneralization), two enhancements of Attribute Oriented Generalization, a well known knowledge discovery from databases technique. GDBR and FIGR are both O(n) and, as such, are optimal. GDBR is an online algorithm and requires only a small, constant amount of space. FIGR also requires a constant amount of space that is generally reasonable, although under certain circumstances, may grow large. FIGR is incremental, allowing changes to the database to be reflected in the generalization results without rereading input data. FIGR also allows fast regeneralization to both higher and lower levels of generality without rereading input. We compare GDBR and FIGR to two previous algorithms, LCHR and AOI, which are O(n log n) and O(np), respectively, where n is the number of input tuples and p the number of tuples in the generalized relation. Both require O(n) space that, for large input, causes memory problems. We implemented all four algorithms and ran empirical tests, and we found that GDBR and FIGR are faster. In addition, their runtimes increase only linearly as input size increases, while the runtimes of LCHR and AOI increase greatly when input size exceeds memory limitations.
Colin L. Carter, Howard J. Hamilton
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
1997 Share Based Measures for Itemsets
Colin L. Carter, Howard J. Hamilton, Nick Cercone
PKDD1
1995 Performance evaluation of attribute-oriented algorithms for knowledge discovery from databases
abstract
Practical tools for knowledge discovery from databases must be efficient enough to handle large data sets found in commercial environments. Attribute-oriented induction has proved to be a useful method for knowledge discovery. Three algorithms are AOI, LCHR and GDBR. We have implemented efficient versions of each algorithm and empirically compared them on large commercial data sets. These tests show that GDBR is consistently faster than AOI and LCHR. GDBR's times increase linearly with increased input size, while times for AOI and LCHR increase non-linearly when memory is exceeded. Through better memory management, however, AOI can be improved to provide some advantages.
Colin L. Carter, Howard J. Hamilton
ICTAI1