EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Evan J. Felix
dblp:18/6508
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 54% Cloud and datacenter computing · 23% High-performance computing · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems › computational storage
active storage |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Evaluation of active storage strategies for the lustre parallel file system · SC 2007 |
High-performance computing › scientific data analysis
in-situ analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Evaluation of active storage strategies for the lustre parallel file system · SC 2007 |
Storage systems › file systems › distributed file system
parallel file system |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Evaluation of active storage strategies for the lustre parallel file system · SC 2007 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter architecture
storage-compute integration |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Evaluation of active storage strategies for the lustre parallel file system · SC 2007 |
Storage systems › file systems › distributed file system › parallel file system
lustre file system |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Evaluation of active storage strategies for the lustre parallel file system · SC 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
microbenchmarking · 0.1application-level evaluation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Evaluation of active storage strategies for the lustre parallel file systemabstractActive Storage provides an opportunity for reducing the amount of data movement between storage and compute nodes of a parallel filesystem such as Lustre, and PVFS. It allows certain types of data processing operations to be performed directly on the storage nodes of modern parallel filesystems, near the data they manage. This is possible by exploiting the underutilized processor and memory resources of storage nodes that are implemented using general purpose servers and operating systems. In this paper, we present a novel user-space implementation of Active Storage for Lustre, and compare it to the traditional kernel-based implementation. Based on microbenchmark and application level evaluation, we show that both approaches can reduce the network traffic, and take advantage of the extra computing capacity offered by the storage nodes at the same time. However, our user-space approach has proved to be faster, more flexible, portable, and readily deployable than the kernel-space version. Juan Piernas, Jarek Nieplocha, Evan J. Felix |
SC | 3 |