EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael P. Mariani
dblp:18/659
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Computer networks · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 87% Distributed systems · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Distributed and cloud data management · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation › workload characterization
database workload characterization |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | Distributed Database Management Model and Validation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1986 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 1986 | Distributed Database Management Model and Validation · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1986 |
Distributed and cloud data management
distributed database performance |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Performance Modeling of Distributed Database · ICDE 1984 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › workload characterization › commercial workloads
database workload |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Performance Modeling of Distributed Database · ICDE 1984 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization |
0.0 | 1 | 1984 | Performance Modeling of Distributed Database · ICDE 1984 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › dependability modeling
availability modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | Availability Analysis of Distributed Processing Systems · INFOCOM 1983 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | Availability Analysis of Distributed Processing Systems · INFOCOM 1983 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
analytical modeling |
0.0 | 1 | 1983 | Availability Analysis of Distributed Processing Systems · INFOCOM 1983 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.0transaction flow diagrams · 0.0queueing model · 0.0availability modeling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1986 | Distributed Database Management Model and ValidationabstractThe authors describe a simple, yet effective, distributed database model that simulates database usage and buffer management in the distributed data processing environment. The model is table driven such that database access requirements, file location, and other information defining the database environment are set up internally in several tables, and linked lists represent the directory and data blocks. Each database transaction is defined and represented by a transaction flow diagram (TFD), and a sequence of TFDs representing an operational scenario is input to the model. The model `executes' input TFDs by looking up tables, and performs buffer management for directory and file data while logging history and gathering various statistics on database usage and buffer management. The performance data are used for database access overhead measurement, database workload characterization, and buffer allocation. Disk access frequency and response time are used to validate the simulation results. Masahiro Tsuchiya, Michael P. Mariani, James D. Brom |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 2 |
| 1984 | Performance Modeling of Distributed DatabaseabstractThis paper describes a simple yet effective distributed database model that simulates database utilization in the distributed data processing environment. The model is table driven such that database access requirements, file location, and other information necessary for defining the database environment are set up internally in several tables. Each database transaction is defined and represented by a transaction flow diagram (TFD) and a sequence of TFDs representing a operational scenario is input to the model. The model "executes" input TFDs by looking up tables that specify their data file access requirements. While executing TFDs, the history of database usage is logged and various statistics are gathered. The performance data are used to measure database access overhead, characterize database workload, and fine-tune performance by reallocating files. The model has been implemented in Fortran on the VAX 11/780 and has been used for both measuring the given database performance and analyzing sensitivity to design changes. It has proven to be an effective tool for analyzing design effectiveness of distributed databases. Masahiro Tsuchiya, Michael P. Mariani |
ICDE | 2 |
| 1983 | Availability Analysis of Distributed Processing Systems
Masahiro Tsuchiya, Michael P. Mariani |
INFOCOM | 2 |
| 1978 | Distributed data processing system design - A look at the partitioning problemabstractThis paper examines the role of partitioning in the design of distributed data processing (DDP) systems for high technology, data driven, real time applications (e.g., Ballistic Missile Defense - BMD). Partitioning processes are contrasted with allocation processes. An overview of the DDP design process is presented, with emphasis on the virtual design phase. Contemporary partitioning strategies and concepts are reviewed, and related to system design goals. Goal-oriented partitioning considerations are discussed for three typical objectives: growth, reliability, and performance. A candidate sequence of partitioning steps to support DDP virtual design analysis is presented. James T. Lawson, Michael P. Mariani |
COMPSAC | 2 |